# Avalanche2001

Members

12

2. ## How to solve causality dilemmas?

Life is a perfect example of this problem: life cannot be if death does not happen, but death cannot be if life does not happen. This is such with many opposites.
3. ## Increse speed of light..

The passage of any light through a black hole would, in no way, increase its maximum speed. To outside observers, it would actually appear as if the light was traveling more slowly, and, as it reached the singularity, it would seem to stop completely before disappearing after some time.

Exactly
5. ## Why is there laws/rules in science?

Well, you see, an arguably large mass is one that wouldbe able to invoke any law of physics. So arguably large is pretty much anything with a mass over zero. i.e. The singularity of a black hole would not be considered to have an arguably large mass. The force of the forces (my apologies for the redundancy there) is how much pressure, energy, or movement it makes. The amount of force of a force varies as to what object it is acting upon. For instance, gravitational force would still be the same on a mouse as a planet, but with less intensity. This situation can be likened to a circuit with a small bulb with an intake of 1.5 volts and a nine volt battery. The bulb only takes in 1.5 volts as it needs, but the battery feeds out a constant amount of voltage. Most objects can make a force possible. Magnetism, for instance, would not be possible without magnetic objects. Forces must exist because matter exists. But forces although forces are a cause of matter, they are not tangible; they are considered non existent in physics. They exist only in concept and by their effects. Stephen Hawking said that because there was gravity, planets must exist. If planets must exist because of gravity, Gravity must exist because of planets. Forces and what they act upon are dependent on each other. This is why forces exist. I'm sorry if my ,set answer wasn't clear enough and I hope that this one is.
6. ## Why is there laws/rules in science?

If any object with an arguably large mass compared to that of the force of the forces possible, the forces would need to exist, such as gravity. without Gravity there would be no mass, and matter must have mass.
7. ## Life, the Universe, and Everything

doing ˈduːɪŋ/ noun 1. the activities in which a particular person engages. "the latest doings of television stars" synonyms: performance, performing, carrying out, effecting, execution, implementation, implementing, bringing off, discharge, discharging, achievement, accomplishment, realization, completion, completing; More informal excrement, especially that of a domestic animal. "it is my duty to clear up the guard dog's doings" informal a beating or scolding. "someone had given her a doing" 2. informal used to refer to things when one has forgotten their name or when no one word easily covers them. "the drawer where he kept the doin

9. ## Why is there laws/rules in science?

There are no laws of the universe. These 'laws' you refer to are really just metaphysical phenomenon a which exist because they have the need to. If there were planets, then gravity would be needed, etc.
10. ## If I can imagine it, it is possible!

If things only existed when thought about or noticed, than technically, nothing would exist because you can only think about one subject at a time, so all others not being thought about by others, mostly specific objects would be non- existent part of the time. And if quantum theory states that no matter can be destroyed or created, how would that work? Things are constantly under change, and, supposedly only themelves when somebody thinks of them as itself, so mentally your theory is correct, but I do not believe it physically. Also, i can Imagine that your Theory is incorrect...
11. ## Imagination encircles the world.

Your theory is paradoxical to itself, and therefore is equal to nothing by the logic of the quantum equation m-n+(i-n). Your input is greater than the output, which is equal to negative zero, so your theory is completely invalid.
12. ## Revenge, how is it justice?

Justice isn't definite so nothing can be proved about it.
×