Leaderboard

An integral part of Mexican cuisine ?

It is not a contradiction, it just isn't compatible with the Newtonian model of time and space. And at its heart, Relativity uses a completely different model for these. In Relativity these measurements are not absolute but frame dependent. An analogy would be these images of two lines: The same set of lines, just viewed from different perspectives. In the first image the red line is "taller" than the green, and in the bottom image the green line is "taller" than the red. The point being that in Relativity, time and space are measured more like the "height" of the lines in the images and not by their absolute length.

Well, if Dim is OK with the reactions he got, we better, close the thread, before a herd of 'oobermenschen' invades it... Otherwise, silence is the answer.

I don't know what you're talking about. I don't like it when people keeps accusing me of bad engagement when I'm honestly engaging. You don't read my mind and I don't yours. Let's get back to what exact issue is under dispute here, namely a titular claim of certain articles that artifacts do things "by itself" or "by themselves." What does the process of evolution have to do with whether an object possess agency or not?

Hello. I am the Ubermensch. A product of many great minds throughout history. You will be well served to read this story. I have found my forum. King David was a sword maker. One of his creations has survived through history. The historical timeline is spotty as to definitive ownership of this Sword during the time through to Maurice Benyovsky, suffice it to say that many great people possessed the Sword prior to Benyovsky, the first elected King of Madagascar. The Sword was gifted to Benyovsky's good friend Benjamin Franklin through him to relative who settled the Sword with Ralph Waldo Emerson. This history of this Sword is well known to these historical figures. Emerson intellectually imbues into the Sword a treasure hunt using a unique coin to be connected to the presence of the Sword. This was Emerson's life long project called "Natural History of Intellect". The Sword/Coin duo, now, was placed to fate. They move to... Thomas Carlyle and through to Richard Wagner, the German creator of "Parsival" a play detailing a cutting instrument and cup of rejuvenation of plenty which is synonymous with the Sword/Coin duo. Obviously very close to Nietzsche, Wagner transfers the Sword/Coin duo to him. Nietzsche and Emerson very close as their work is well known to each other (in the open); however, they never met. Emerson's "Oversoul" or "Pure Transcendentalist" imbued into the Sword/Coin is synonymous with Nietzsche's now "Ubermensche". Nietzsche carry's on Emerson's legacy in the object duo. How does Nietzsche proceed?... Nietzsche becoming ill just after penning Z. part IV. He is approached by an obscure figure. Dr. Willibald Hentschel, the early father of Eugenics which was hijacked and proliferated by Hitler after 1933. Hentschel became a nazi late in life due to political pressure but never adhered to the political position and was a double agent against Hitler when he finally became a registered nazi. He died in about 1946. Hentschel desired a very limited copy of the penciled Z. Part IV and Nietzsche seeing him as a potential candidate to propel into the future the Sword/Coin project of Emerson and now Nietzsche, he passed the Sword/Coin duo to Hentschel. The ancient Sword, once in America gone to Europe will now be going back to America with the Hentschel line ( all documented )... The Sword/Coin duo has the imbued potential to teach one (and only one) the historical, intellectual facts of the coming Ubermensch. Who would that be...? At this point do we really consider that this story is coincidental? What is the Power behind its creation, its evolution, its Truth? How does this connect with Carl Jung and Nietzsche? How is this video relevant: A young boy, innocent, observant, enthusiastic has found a sword in a an old steamer trunk in the attic of his boyhood home in 1976. Forty-six years later he publishes this book: "RED KNEE....Itsy, bitsy SPIDER. Ah, yes, moving into the "Age of Aquarius" as the video suggests. My job, throughout the historical highway of learning as I have become an autodidact, was to become...to learn of who I am and who I will become. This was the experiment of "Natural History of Intellect" and of the "Ubermensch" of Emerson and Nietzsche, respectively. How do I proceed...? What now? Who studies this? How do we get this fantastic story to people who need it? The "Age of Aquarius," yes...please, only serious adherents write me at personal email removed by moderator Ubermensch. SWORDIMAGE.pdf