ydoaPs Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Wikileaks released an email cache yesterday. This email gets rid of some of the mystery about why Clinton never released her speech transcripts. It contains several excerpts that the campaign deemed more damaging than releasing the transcripts. Do you think that it was smarter for them to keep them than to release them, or would it have worked better for them to have released them in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 No matter what she does, she's attacked. Heads, you win; Tails, I lose. I understand the decision they made and think it was their least bad available option, especially now seeing their actual content. I just don't find them to be terribly damning, especially in context of everything else happening right now (they also confirm her support for UHC and clean energy) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Yeah, I thought there were some nice surprises in the speeches, frankly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Airbrush Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 If that is the worst that WikiLeaks can offer, then there is nothing for Hillary to worry about. Maybe WikiLeaks is saving the worst for just before the election? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 Might be a hoax anyway: https://www.wired.com/2016/10/even-fake-clinton-foundation-hack-can-serious-damage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now