MonDie Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 (edited) quick question This paper was free, but they've moved it behind the pay gate. Why might they have done this? Can pedophiles be reached for primary prevention of child sexual abuse? First results of the Berlin Prevention Project Dunkelfeld (PPD) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14789940903174188 I've linked to this paper to show that underage preferences are inversely related to adult-oriented preferences, with most of their convenience sample consisting of primary or exclusive-type pedophiles. Edited November 28, 2014 by MonDie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted November 28, 2014 Share Posted November 28, 2014 When it was five years old? When it passed 250 views? Change of editorial policy? Who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted November 29, 2014 Share Posted November 29, 2014 Sometimes the free version is the pre-proof or the ahead of print version. After the article goes into print it gets moved to a paywall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MonDie Posted November 30, 2014 Author Share Posted November 30, 2014 (edited) It went to pay within the last half of the year, but was published five years ago. it was full of nonetheless fascinating statistics about their sloppy sample of minor-philes, and I'm kicking myself for assuming I didn't have to make back-ups of research articles. Edited November 30, 2014 by MonDie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now