petrushka.googol Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Is the lion truly the king of beasts ? Or is this a misnomer? Why not the elephant for its size, the chimpanzee for its intelligence or the humble ant for its networking (social) intelligence? (I personally think an ant colony is the precursor to social networks). Please advise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 To be clear, no, the lion is not literally a king that rules all the other animals. In the sense that it's fairly dangerous but even more puffed up by outward appearance and ultimately a scavenger, I'd say it makes a pretty good kingly metaphor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Bacteria all the way. When the last animal dies there will still be bacteria decomposing them. But seriously, this is more a poetic rather than a biological question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delboy Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Yes, all very subjective. Atlantic Krill could be top of the pile in an objective sense - the single species with the largest biomass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 You mean Lion King wasn't a documentary? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharonY Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 More of a field report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now