Jump to content

Fields and particles

Recommended Posts

This is a rather theoretical question, but is it possible in physics to have a description of reality which does not consist of particles but only fields. Or are fields always defined in such a way that particles must exist?

The problem I think is that at the very fundamental level of physics, we have matter/particles defined in terms of spacetime, and spacetime defined in terms of matter/particles. You can not define one without the other.

To measure something in empty space is impossible, and likewise, to define particles without spacetime is also impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

From a QM point of view, particles are necessary, but not for many properties. Not necessarily for being points, but to count them, and as a nice way to say that whan the extension of a particle changes, some properties keep conserved, for instance the charge. Also, to avoid that a particle repels itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.