Mystery111 Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 I said the existence of these particles four years ago. Today, only the most prominent papers which speculate their existences are coming to light... http://www.stardrive.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5377:a-1997-paper-published-on-cornells-aixvorg-neutrinos-must-be-tachyons&catid=43:science&Itemid=82 This is not a matter of relativity being wrong, but is rather a methodology of bad science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mansamusa Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 how so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted November 9, 2012 Share Posted November 9, 2012 I said the existence of these particles four years ago. Today, only the most prominent papers which speculate their existences are coming to light... http://www.stardrive.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5377:a-1997-paper-published-on-cornells-aixvorg-neutrinos-must-be-tachyons&catid=43:science&Itemid=82 This is not a matter of relativity being wrong, but is rather a methodology of bad science. Your link is a 404 error... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now