mansamusa

imo it doesnt change anything. because we now have terms like past, present and future. we also record time chronologically etc.

is time simply a illusion?

thats what i was thinking wouldnt taxonomy be involve?

A tiny, furry-tailed creature is the most complete picture yet as to what the ancestor of humans once looked like. These new findings also suggest this forerunner appeared shortly after the catastrophe that ended the age of dinosaurs, scientists added. http://news.yahoo.com/meet-mama-first-ancestor-placental-mammals-revealed-191137721.html

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/01/21/doubling-down-four-stranded-quadruple-helix-dna-discovered/ 60 years after scientists first described the “double helix” shape of human DNA, the chemical code of life, scientists have discovered the first quadruple helix -- and it may help them prevent the runaway cell proliferation at the root of cancer. "It's been sixty years since its structure was solved but work like this shows us that the story of DNA continues to twist and turn," said Julie Sharp, senior science information manager at Cancer Research UK. 'The story of DNA continues to twist and turn.' - Julie Sharp, senior science information manager at Cancer Research UK The research, published Monday in the science journal Nature Chemistry, shows clearly a four-stranded DNA structure that the scientists dubbed a “G-quadruplex.” The name comes from the building block guanine, one of the chemical bases that form DNA, along with adenine, cytosine, and thymine (usually abbreviated to their first letter). By targeting these DNA oddities with synthetic molecules that trap and contain them -- preventing cells from replicating their DNA and consequently blocking cell division -- it may be possible to halt the spread of cancer, the researchers said. "We are seeing links between trapping the quadruplexes with molecules and the ability to stop cells dividing, which is hugely exciting," said professor Shankar Balasubramanian from the University of Cambridge's Department of Chemistry and Cambridge Research Institute, whose group produced the research. "We've come a long way in 10 years, from simple ideas to really seeing some substance in the existence and tractability of targeting these funny structures," he told the BBC. "I'm hoping now that the pharmaceutical companies will bring this on to their radar and we can perhaps take a more serious look at whether quadruplexes are indeed therapeutically viable targets Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/01/21/doubling-down-four-stranded-quadruple-helix-dna-discovered/#ixzz2IdhuXA3Q

i have been told that certain fruits and vegetables are male/female is there any truth to this?

would this also pertain to a different phenotype

how does infra red light work ? we can't see that shift normally right ? what if i made a full body suit made of infra red, would yall be able to see me ?

actually found it on another site but i see your point and thanks

actually this is something i came across online (in reference to the theory)

okay someone gave me this answer would you agree with this : There is a theory that peoples that lived in grassland savannas tend to have more intricate musical patterns than peoples that lived in other terrains. The thought being that grassland and lowland savannas by nature tend to allow sound to travel further and more accurately. This is thought relevant due to hunter gatherers leaving the homesite further and further away and over time using chants, percussions and "music" as a communicative network with the homesite.. Over time, this disposition toward chants, pervussions and music proves beneficial and is made more complex to communicate more complicated messages...thus over time providing survival value that can be refined and passed fown through darwinian and mendelian mechanisms.

Afro-American as it oppose to asian etc.

AbiogenesisDo Evolutionist believe in Abiogenesis aka Spontaneous Generation? If so, explain why.

???? also also another good question about sound is why are asian people usually better at identifying specific musical notes than other peoples. i know its related to pitch and that asian people seem to use pitch a lot more in their speech to stress different syllables

One must first realize how extremely complicated quantum mechanics is and how far reaching it goes.. this is why it is very difficult to explain it in a few neat sentences and paragraphs because in most cases it takes about 300 pages to describe it accurately (in addition to describing the wholly metaphysical aspect of it which we are doing here!)<br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">but i will try to keep it simply and MAKE IT PLAIN !<br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">1) Quantum mechanics makes us look at the world and universe as if it was a creature that possesses an external body and an internal mind. This outer body of the universe and world is what we scientists have struggled with since the beginning of "time". it is the world as we know it susceptible to natural laws and verifiable thru what i call the "uniformity of experience" (like things in like circumstances always leave predicatble results !).............quantum mechanics is merely the study and theory that encompasses not this outer body of our world view, but rather the "inner workings" behind this outer body on a subatomic level! what is found when scientists study this "inner realm" is that things dont "behave" properly.. ie.. my whole philosophy of the "uniformity of experience" becomes hogwash....this may not seem like a big deal to layppl, but this is a tremendous deal to scientists and scientific disciplines that thrive on making sense of the world we live in by relying on the fact that there is such a thing called the uniformity of experience<br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">2) quantum mechanics studies the fundamental particles thought to be the building blocks of existence and of our universe.. however, after delving into this realm it is perceived that these partiles are actually not real things.. they are nothing but "possibilities" of consciousness, but yet do affect the material world ! now thats mindblowing! that the "stuff" everything is made of may not even be real "stuff" ! In addition.. this stuff doesnt seem to follow equations and probability assumptions we thought.. so what is it and what controls it?<br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br style="font-family: verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: italic; background-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">3) human consciousness is controlled by quantum mechanics.. thus controlled by stuff that may not potentially be "real".. thus the human experience is flawed from ever justifying what is "reality".. the human mind may be abstract simply because the material world is not material !

this subject has given me a headache honestly this is the second time that i have heard fractals mention in reference to said topic

hey yall im currently in a dialogue and im wondering if the person is right he says: On our physical plane of existence we can detect only about 100 octaves of electromagnetic radiation, ranging from radio waves through visible light to x-rays and gamma rays, the electromagnetic spectrum covers an infinite range of frequencies – or at least we have no reason to believe otherwise. What to us is 'empty' space is simply those regions of space containing no grade of matter that is perceptible to our physical senses. An important property of electromagnetic energy is that waves of sufficiently different frequencies do not interfere or interact. If physical matter is condensed energy as science now maintains, it seems reasonable to suppose that the infinite spectrum of energy gives rise to infinite grades of matter, and that grades of matter of sufficiently differing densities or rates of vibration can pass through one another without noticeably interacting. In other words, although physical matter is condensed energy, what is energy would be matter for beings on a higher plane than ours, as is suggested by the fact that energy does not exist in a continuous flow but is composed of discrete units or quanta. If that is the case, then it is reasonable to suggest that our physical universe could be just one octave in an infinite spectrum of matter-energy, and be interpenetrated by innumerable other invisible non-physical worlds, both denser and also more aethereal than our own, but beyond our physical range of perception. The concept of worlds within worlds is therefore entirely reasonable if we pursue some of the basic concepts of science to their logical conclusion. Waves by the way, imply motion and there is no motion that is independent of substance whether the substance is physical or aethereal. In other words, waves have to wave in some medium otherwise they are simply abstractions. Space is not 'empty' either, it is constituted by different grades of energy-substance otherwise waves could not be propagated through it. thoughts

so an 5 6 7 dimension exist?

so tachyon doesnt exist, im confuse?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=uXOTKidm7A0 base 1?

so tachyon energy is really particles?

can someone explain to me what is tachyon energy

how so?

if you could break down the 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th dimension in da most simplelest non wordy no frills way how would u do it?