Jump to content

Maximum Size Of Solid Planet


Fellow

Recommended Posts

Guest Tinymidget

Well, just use the law of relativity for explanation here.

 

The earth too sucks things in, but, its mass is not enough to totally distort space time. A black hole basically just totally rips spacetime so when you get "sucked" into it you basically don't exsist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tinymidget

Also, there would be no heat at all, which wouldn't that mean it would be the only object to achieve absolute zero? (that would also freeze any gas...and plasma)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tinymidget

Yea, I meant that basically you don't exsist in the sense that your have been totally ripped from space time.

 

Can you edit posts on these forums? (newbie)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, MrL says there's no way really of knowing what state the matter from the original star is in where black holes are concerned. As for the internal energy forces, you'd have to ask him or Rad.

 

If you are using the default style, the "edit" link is next to the date and time, at the top-left of your post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tinymidget said in post #10 :

Also, there would be no heat at all, which wouldn't that mean it would be the only object to achieve absolute zero? (that would also freeze any gas...and plasma)

 

It wouldn't be absolute zero, because quite clearly the average energy (terrible, terrible phrase, but I'm tired) of the object isn't nil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MrL_JaKiri said in post #4 :

That's black holes duder, and that's for a given mass

 

oh yeah it is for a given mass, but then how do we define "solid planet".... solid what? solid iron, solid gold, solid rock, solid neutrons.... then what defines a "planet" other than say, an object orbiting a star. I see no real reason why an incredibly large planet right on the verge of collapsing to a black hole couldn't form around a star (other than ripping the star apart, so lets put it far away from the star) and this would be a planet that crumpled so that it is solid neutrons, give or take a bit. what we can say though is that the largest solid planet could not be any greater in mass than the mass dictated by the schwarzchild radius. If we want sheer volume on the other hand, it would be the chandrasekhar limit. technically that is calculated for white dwarves, but I see no reason why one could not apply it to planets. so the largest planet would be about 1.44 solar masses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check out this book

Worlds Without End: Exploration of Planets Known and Unknown

by

John S. Lewis

 

Talks about how planets gas and terrestrial planets form. For instance if the Earth was larger it would be hoter and more covered by oceans. Smaller and like Mars. A little short but covers the subject in great detail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MrL_JaKiri said in post # :

It's a silly thread, given that the earth ISN'T solid. The mantle is a tad liquid.

 

That aside, I don't know if a neutron star would count as a planet, and not as a binary system.

 

good shot. the earth is not solid, and has an atmosphere too. Just like Jupiter.

 

when is a planet not a planet I wonder. Even brown dwarves should be regarded as planets since they are not fusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Orient Vessel V

yes, it was once thought taht borwn dwarf which had cooled down may have the rights elements for life...

 

...but who knows how big a terra type planet could grow :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to planets, there is a certain size above which a planet cannot exceed, otherwise fusion reactions would begin occuring in its centre, making it a star.

 

I assume this refers to the planets mass and I would guess elemental mix came into it somewhere.

 

Ive read in a lot of astrology textbooks that if Jupiter were a little more massive it would have become a small star. I dont have any more information apart form that, Ill Google and post more later. Better yet, you can Google and post it as well.

 

hell, lets all Google.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Equilibrius

Aren't black holes one compressed atom? The actually gravity is not solid.

 

And a natural occuring planet has to be a reasonable size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Black holes can suck in the atoms of whole stars that pass, so they are accumulations of atoms but the small ones created in the near future in our labratories will be the mass and energies of many atoms for a short period of time until they destabilize. I don't know how a black hole could exist with the mass of a single atom unless it was a super heavy element which we don't have a clue exists yet.

The largest planet would probably be a lithium planet with a hydrogen atmosphere somewhere in the universe. Just my opinion.

Just aman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.