Rasori Posted December 23, 2003 Share Posted December 23, 2003 I personally think that we humans did not evolve from monkeys (gorillas, whichever it was lol) but that they evolved from us. Gorillas (I'm assuming that was the one now) do not go around killing each other, and don't destroy their environment. Not only that, but they didn't contribute to the Greenhouse Effect or anything else we've done. They haven't developed WMD. They can grab things both with their hands AND their feet! (Obvious plus there!) And, of course, they can never turn down a perfectly good banana :banana::banana::banana: Yes, this is mainly a joke. But there is SOME sense to it (cough :bs: cough) Yes, yes, very very :lame: What's new? :flame: me, please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSX Posted December 24, 2003 Share Posted December 24, 2003 Maybe put this in Pseudoscience? & bananas are tasty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasori Posted December 24, 2003 Author Share Posted December 24, 2003 Evolution- Darwin's Theory of Evolution. Thought it fit here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iglak Posted December 24, 2003 Share Posted December 24, 2003 here's a :flame:: DAGNABBIT!!! that's wrong! we did not evolve from monkeys! the theory of evolution says that monkeys and humans have a common ancestor, meaning that we evolved from the same thing they evoled from. this in no way says that we evolved from monkeys. get your facts straight! well that was fun, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rasori Posted December 24, 2003 Author Share Posted December 24, 2003 LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted January 2, 2004 Share Posted January 2, 2004 I'm prepared to leave this in the Evolution/Morphology forum if you can get a proper debate out of it, but it is teetering on the very edge of the Pseudoscience precipice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 5, 2004 Share Posted January 5, 2004 In my opinion humans did evolve. Try http://www.darwinawards.com They are evolution happening! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfin vampire Posted January 5, 2004 Share Posted January 5, 2004 http://www.scienceforums.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2512 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmoore80 Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 today’s science is tomorrow’s superstition Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayonara Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 That's a broad and fairly meaningless generalisation, well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 danmoore80 said in post #9 :today’s science is tomorrow’s superstition hence creationism and noahs flood were falsified over 100 years ago. they are now the superstition of which you speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 11, 2004 Share Posted January 11, 2004 danmoore80 said in post #9 :today’s science is tomorrow’s superstition I don't see Newton's Laws of Gravitation entering superstition any time soon. Unless of course you haven't actually understood what you're talking about and just saying something because it sounds good. Empiricism will only ever arise to more and more precise approximations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmoore80 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Radical Edward said in post #11 : hence creationism and noahs flood were falsified over 100 years ago. they are now the superstition of which you speak. That's funny. Since you are so well edjumacated You would also know, that not one single verse in the Bible i.e. KJV has ever been disproved. Facinating I think for a hoax as you would call it. But the lies Evolutionist have been trying to pass off are continually updated or changed. How then is it that the Bible has lasted so long without needing change? Maybe they were just better liars back then? Please Respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fafalone Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 The bible has not been updated because there is no new evidence that support anything it says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmoore80 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 weak. So are you agreeing then, that the Bible, thus far, has never been proved wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 He never said that. Noah's flood was proved wrong! faf might say that, but only if he had Rad++++++ on his ignore list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmoore80 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Cap'n Refsmmat said in post #16 :He never said that. Noah's flood was proved wrong! faf might say that, but only if he had Rad++++++ on his ignore list. No. He said that it has not been rewritten becuase there was no new evidence to put in. Not that any had been disproved. Goodnight and God Bless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skye Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 The bible has changed with different translations. Do you mean scientifically dispoven? I hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danmoore80 Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Skye said in post #18 :The bible has changed with different translations. Do you mean scientifically dispoven? I hope not. Yes. Scientifically. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radical Edward Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 danmoore80 said in post #13 : That's funny. Since you are so well edjumacated You would also know, that not one single verse in the Bible i.e. KJV has ever been disproved. Facinating I think for a hoax as you would call it. But the lies Evolutionist have been trying to pass off are continually updated or changed. How then is it that the Bible has lasted so long without needing change? Maybe they were just better liars back then? Please Respond. It is true that the KJV has never been "disproved" but that is immaterial. First of all lack of "disproof" does not make something true. I could claim that Iggy the magical elf (who talks to me in my dreams by the way) is responsible personally for all the forces in nature, and made the entire universe last tuesday. You could not dosprove this. go on - try. Secondly it depends on your interpretation. Following the basic axiom that true statements cannot have false consequences, one can come to a conclusion as to whether something is true or not. From this we can find a literal interpretation of the KJV to be false in many respects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iglak Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Radical Edward said in post #20 :I could claim that Iggy the magical elf (who talks to me in my dreams by the way) is responsible personally for all the forces in nature, and made the entire universe last tuesday. Hey! i am not a magical elf! i did make the universe last tuesday... but that's not the point! i, in no way, am an elf! dang, sorry, the nickname for my fake name is Iggy, i thought i was using that on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaKiri Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 danmoore80 said in post #13 : that not one single verse in the Bible i.e. KJV has ever been disproved Hahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atinymonkey Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 Don't laugh. Only last night I made a woman from one of my ribs, in a 'Weird Science' style experiment. I call her 'Ribby', she looks like Kelly LeBrook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted January 12, 2004 Share Posted January 12, 2004 atinymonkey said in post #23 :Don't laugh. Only last night I made a woman from one of my ribs, in a 'Weird Science' style experiment. I call her 'Ribby', she looks like Kelly LeBrook. Oooh! Interesting! Post instructions! I wanna do it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest f0nd004u Posted January 13, 2004 Share Posted January 13, 2004 lol and i created a son from my toe. Hes black. Im white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now