Jump to content

Mega hard integral <plz help>


caseclosed

Recommended Posts

Let x equal tan^6.

thank you, I was letting x^(1/6)=tan(x) so the problem got really complicated and I ended up nowhere, lol....

 

now here is another one I have trouble on, no clue where to start this one at all

integrate 1/(1+cos(x)+sin(x))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good spot by Jordan

 

With x = tan^6(A) the integral simplifies to

 

/

|6tan^5(A)sec^2(A) dA/((tan^3(A)*(1+tan^2(A)))=

/

 

/

|6tan^2(A)dA

/

 

1/(1+cos(x)+sin(x)) can be done by substituing sinx = 2t/1+t^2 and Cosx = (1-t^2)/(1+t^2) where t = tan(0.5x)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you are seriousely over complicating this.

 

if you just times out the root(x) =>

 

[math] \int (x^\frac {1}{2} + x^\frac {5}{6})^{-1} dx[/math]

 

Which is easier... I think :s

 

although I might be talking rubbish :s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I used what you did for exponents, [math](a+b)^2 = a^2+b^2[/math]

You can't distribute an exponent. If you have [math](a+b)^{-1}[/math] You cannot say that this is [math]a^{-1}+b^{-1}[/math]

That would be the same as saying [math]\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{b}=\frac{1}{a+b}[/math]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you are seriousely over complicating this.

 

if you just times out the root(x) =>

 

[math] \int (x^\frac {1}{2} + x^\frac {5}{6})^{-1} dx[/math]

 

Which is easier... I think :s

 

although I might be talking rubbish :s

 

I do agree that this has been overcomplicated' date=' but I don't see how your suggestion helps.

 

I would say a tan substitution is necessary

 

It isn't. All you have to do is let [imath]u=\sqrt[6]{x}[/imath] in the original integral. Then you can do a partial fraction expansion, as caseclosed had initially surmised.

 

That solution seems a whole lot more obvious to me, but to each his own...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree that this has been overcomplicated' date=' but I don't see how your suggestion helps.

 

 

 

It isn't. All you have to do is let [imath']u=\sqrt{x}[/imath] in the original integral. Then you can do a partial fraction expansion, as caseclosed had initially surmised.

 

That solution seems a whole lot more obvious to me, but to each his own...

 

 

I agree I wasn't thinking when I posted it seems. Sorry for any confussion I caused...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom - My mind doesn't actually work that way. I just thought Jordan's original idea was smart and unusual

 

The point about the tan substitution is that regardless as to how you do it the final arctan term comes from a direct or implied tan substitution. I didn't really mean to suggest the tan^6(A) substitution was the only one possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All you have to do is let [imath]u=\sqrt{x}[/imath] in the original integral. Then you can do a partial fraction expansion' date=' as caseclosed had initially surmised.

[/quote']

 

FYI, there's a typo there. I meant for you to let u equal the 6th root of x, not the square root.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.