The ideology of the Left emphasizes protecting the weak. Initially this was a continuation of European humanism, but now this has become exaggerated (a reason why the Right constantly criticizes the Left).

The Left appeals to various groups of people, whom it calls hurt by "white supremacists," and promises to force these supremacists to pay compensations to these minorities. Thus, leftist governments pay all sorts of subsidies to ethnic minorities, sexual minorities, and disabled people; to some extent, the Left also tries to include all women among these hurt groups who are "protected" by the Left (feminism). The final result is that white working men are forced to pay money to all these minorities. If we think about it, this is nothing more than vote buying—the Left simply buys the votes of these minorities. And these minorities collectively become the majority.

I wonder how clearly the ban on vote-buying is written into the constitutions and laws of modern democratic countries, and whether, purely theoretically, the US Constitutional Court could forbid the Democratic Party on this basis?

2 hours ago, Linkey said:

The final result is that white working men are forced to pay money to all these minorities.

That's the lie the elite tells the hoi polloi to divert the blame for the problems of society away from themselves and towards minorities.

Edited 7 hours ago7 hr by KJW

1 hour ago, KJW said:

That's the lie the elite tells the hoi polloi to divert the blame for the problems of society away from themselves and towards minorities.

+1

I don't know if discussion ( if you can call it that) will be allowed to continue after such an overtly racist and misogynistic Opening Post.

Dishonest bigoted trolling, reported.

7 hours ago, Linkey said:

The ideology of the Left emphasizes protecting the weak. Initially this was a continuation of European humanism, but now this has become exaggerated (a reason why the Right constantly criticizes the Left).

The Left appeals to various groups of people, whom it calls hurt by "white supremacists," and promises to force these supremacists to pay compensations to these minorities. Thus, leftist governments pay all sorts of subsidies to ethnic minorities, sexual minorities, and disabled people; to some extent, the Left also tries to include all women among these hurt groups who are "protected" by the Left (feminism). The final result is that white working men are forced to pay money to all these minorities. If we think about it, this is nothing more than vote buying—the Left simply buys the votes of these minorities. And these minorities collectively become the majority.

I wonder how clearly the ban on vote-buying is written into the constitutions and laws of modern democratic countries, and whether, purely theoretically, the US Constitutional Court could forbid the Democratic Party on this basis?

What a crock of shit.

I suppose this is what bigots tells themselves in order to justify their attitudes, but, as with many of your posts, there’s no evidence that this comes from an effort to have a discussion in good faith. There’s no actual scholarship involved; no citations of laws or the Constitution that are allegedly being violated, and no investigation of other possible motivations for the policies or the public good that results from them. It’s based on bigotry and not facts (e.g. the largest group of SNAP recipients is white people). This framing isn’t consistent with rule 2.12