20 minutes ago, swansont said:

This is better discussed in the politics section of the board, rather than the science section.

It was relevant to the population question, and germane to the even more central question of the political will take any decisive action regarding climate change. I don't see how these matters can be isolated one from another. 

6 minutes ago, studiot said:

I do believe I already said all this

I was merely responding; didn't mean to imply it hadn't been said before, and better.  

4 minutes ago, Peterkin said:

It was relevant to the population question, and germane to the even more central question of the political will take any decisive action regarding climate change. I don't see how these matters can be isolated one from another. 

Quantifying the effect of population on CO2 and identifying causes is science, but once anyone starts talking about legislation it's pretty clearly a politics discussion.

24 minutes ago, Peterkin said:

It was relevant to the population question, and germane to the even more central question of the political will take any decisive action regarding climate change. I don't see how these matters can be isolated one from another. 

I was merely responding; didn't mean to imply it hadn't been said before, and better.  

 

On 9/27/2021 at 1:22 PM, studiot said:

Perhaps your subject (Climate Change) is just too large to fit into one thread.

Perhaps you should treat it like eating an elephant.

 

So taking one of your points only, popultion control as quoted.

This alone need at least one thread to itself and is a socio-economic / political issue not a scientific one.

................

.............

But all this requires a proper airing in a dedicated thread.

 

So start your own thread.

 

PS my apologies for the poor spelling in my previous posts.

41 minutes ago, studiot said:

So start your own thread.

Thank, you, no. It's all been said, reiterated and rephrased, then said again.