I'm looking for critiques and potentially someone reputable that's capable of doing the math to make it publishable. I'm not a physicist but have reason to believe that I'm correct.

6 hours ago, TimothyAClark2 said:

I'm looking for critiques and potentially someone reputable that's capable of doing the math to make it publishable. I'm not a physicist but have reason to believe that I'm correct.

Hello Timothy,

I can see you have much work to do explaining your ideas since you are using different definitions for common scientific words from (the rest of) the scientific community.

Radical though he may have been Einstein did not do this.

 

In particular do you actually know what the scientific definitions of 'fractal' and 'dimension' are ?

You state  "Einstein's assumption of a static 3 dimensional space....."

Did you know that significant investigation into the mathematics and science of multi dimensional space was started before Einstein and received an impetus when his theory of special relativity came out ?

In particular various multidimensional spaces were studied intensively with the result that 2 dimensions are insufficient, 4 and more dimensions offer additional phenomenon that are not observed leaving only 3 dimensional space as being the appropriate number.

Significant Mathematical material was developed by Sommerville, Eddington, Hausdorf, Abbot amongst others at this time and the work has continued to this day because it is not yet 'finished'  - if it ever will be. It is worth noting that modern (and slightly earlier) mathematicians have even added significantly to Euclid's massive epic.

We can discuss these comments if you like, which could save you a lot of heartache in the future.

I am sorry to be so negative as you appear sincere in your efforts.

 

8 hours ago, TimothyAClark2 said:

I'm looking for ... someone reputable that's capable of doing the math to make it publishable.

!

Moderator Note

We don’t permit such requests here. Rule 2.11