According to this article: https://phys.org/news/2017-09-entanglement-inevitable-feature-reality.html

Quote

"My future goals would be to see if Bell non-locality can likewise be derived from the existence of a classical limit," Richens said. "It would be interesting if all theories superseding classical theory must violate local realism. ..."

 

27 minutes ago, Strange said:

According to this article: https://phys.org/news/2017-09-entanglement-inevitable-feature-reality.html

 

I nearly posted your link this morning on the interested thread on entanglement? but thought better of it.

Link for Bell non locality https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.2849.pdf

A simpler explanation of Bell's theorem: http://drchinese.com/David/Bell_Theorem_Easy_Math.htm

25 minutes ago, Strange said:

A simpler explanation of Bell's theorem: http://drchinese.com/David/Bell_Theorem_Easy_Math.htm

Yep a lot easier to read

BUT the last paragraph I wasn't too sure about

"Please note that there is a way out of this seemingly impossible scenario, but the loophole may be difficult to swallow: if Einstein's Relativity is wrong, and the speed of light is NOT a limit for propagation of cause and effect (which is called "signal locality"), then that would give us a way out of the situation. Theoretically, there could exist non-local hidden variables (Bohm outlined such a theory, for example). But regardless, the net effect of Bell's Theorem is profound. Reality is somehow dependent upon how we observe it.
"

Can anyone explain how Einstein being wrong gets out of the seemingly impossible scenario?

2 hours ago, Handy andy said:

Yep a lot easier to read

BUT the last paragraph I wasn't too sure about

"Please note that there is a way out of this seemingly impossible scenario, but the loophole may be difficult to swallow: if Einstein's Relativity is wrong, and the speed of light is NOT a limit for propagation of cause and effect (which is called "signal locality"), then that would give us a way out of the situation. Theoretically, there could exist non-local hidden variables (Bohm outlined such a theory, for example). But regardless, the net effect of Bell's Theorem is profound. Reality is somehow dependent upon how we observe it.
"

Can anyone explain how Einstein being wrong gets out of the seemingly impossible scenario?

If c isn't the limit on information transfer, then faster (possibly instantaneous) communication isn't a problem.