My theory doesn't change the current results except for when trying to trick the system. Can the current established equation handle a criss-cross setup? What are the results when doing so?

 

So either it follows the existing rules or it doesn't follow rules. Which is it?

 

 

I'll say whatever you want to conduct this experiment

 

Why would I need a different equation than one that is already established? Can I just have the closest one to the experiment I'm speaking of and mod in the bit about a lattice?

If the established model works we don't need a new one. A new model needs to be different (and better) in some way.

My theory doesn't change the current results except for when trying to trick the system.

And we're back to asking for the model and specific predictions.

Wouldn't you want to know if there is a 3D lattice all around us? It would be undeniable proof we are in a simulation.

My theory doesn't change the current results except for when trying to trick the system.

 

 

And how exactly (quantitatively, mathematically) will the results change?

Wouldn't you want to know if there is a 3D lattice all around us? It would be undeniable proof we are in a simulation.

 

 

No it wouldn't. There are models of quantised space-time (and proposed experiments to test some of them). So there are natural explanations for such a thing without resorting to things like simulation.

So, no model? OK, we're done.

 

This is a place for science discussion. You have to meet us halfway.