Jump to content

SubJunk

Senior Members
  • Content Count

    224
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Neutral

About SubJunk

  • Rank
    Atom

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.spirton.com/
  1. Well that's like me saying "all peaches taste like apples" when i've never tried a peach before; It might be completely true (hypothetically) but I have no way of knowing that. The law was defined for one purpose and to twist that purpose into something completely unrelated isn't something I think is very productive at all. Yeah I saw the article, pretty cool stuff Add it to the collection of evidence for evolution
  2. Um no it does not mean that at all. The 2nd law of thermodynamics, as JustStuit said, is to do with heat, to explain macroscopic irreversibility of isolated systems which aren't at thermal equilibrium. This is stuff you learn in your first year of a physics degree, and interpreting it in the way creationists are quickly become famous for is laughable and only goes to show a lack of education on your part.
  3. String punching through into another of the 7 dimensions? That's not how it works. I would recommend learning a little more about string theory and what strings actually are, also what is meant by "extra dimensions". A useful analogy is to think of an insect crawling around a pole, this insect is in a way existing in a dimension we can't see. This is what is meant by extra dimension, where each extra dimension only exists at an incedibly unfathomably small size.
  4. Easy! I just took my new Sony 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ megapixel and took a photo of my foot. Imported it into photoshop, after buying a few new hard drives to fit the image on, then zoomed in for a few days until I saw them. Can't wait 'till Sony brings out the new model of that camera, it will be able to go sub-atomic!
  5. Haha okay then, both you and quick silver win and therefore have the jobs of posting the next 2 images
  6. They're atoms. That's a photo taken 0.6 angstroms, so I guess quicksilver is right, or half right anyway I don't know if they're in a crystal
  7. No no, you're all thinking too large. Smaller.
  8. That's an answer only an insane alien would give
  9. Nope, guess again. Want a hint?
  10. Oo I have a great one, check this out.
  11. Mwahaha I have returned to be a pain in the ass by being overly rational!
  12. But if you had antimatter inside a barrel you would need a lot of heavy confining equipment to stop it touching the matter of the barrel so it wouldn't actually become lighter, it would become heavier
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.