Jump to content

sunshaker

Senior Members
  • Posts

    537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by sunshaker

  1. Just a thought, I was wondering that if all stars are emitting photons in all directions there would still be a beam the diameter of each star hitting our sun, In effect adding energy to our sun (stars feeding stars), I wondered about our suns 11 year solar cycle and Jupiters 11.8 year orbit, And thought maybe there is a connection, If Jupiters orbit acts like a eclipse blocking out a large amount of these incoming photons from hitting our sun, In effect cooling our sun by a small margin, Also adding heat to Jupiter, Maybe a factor to storms on Jupiter. Most of our nearest stars are within 11 light years http://www.universetoday.com/102920/what-is-the-closest-star/ Alpha Centauri – 4.2 Barnard’s Star – 5.9 Wolf 359 – 7.8 Lalande 21185 – 8.3 Sirius – 8.6 Luyten 726-8 – 8.7 Ross 154 – 9.7 Ross 248 – 10.3 Epsilon Eridani – 10.5 Lacaille 9352 – 10.7 Ross 128 – 10.9 EZ Aquarii – 11.3 Procyon – 11.4 61 Cygni – 11.4 Struve 2398 – 11.5 Groombridge 34 – 11.6 Epison Indi – 11.8 Dx Carncri – 11.8 Tau Ceti – 11.9 GJ 106 – 11.9
  2. I thought this was interesting about ultra-relativistic electrons in a 3rd intermittent Van Allen belt. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/ucla-scientists-explain-the-formation-248209 If electrons can be caused by photon collisions, I would expect the created electrons to be scattered at close to the speed of light. Some perhaps becoming caught in the magnetic fields within the Van Allen belts (Electron solar storms) Could they then lose energy and then dissipate into the two major electron belts, Until the next electron storm that will create another 3rd ring of ultra relativistic electrons.
  3. I was thinking that if photon collisions do produce electrons, As every point would have billions of these photon collisions producing electrons/positrons. Electrons have a tiny mass also there is the point that electrons can be in multiple places at once, Which would lead me to believe that every point in space would be full of electrons, Each exerting a gravitational force, Helping to slow down space expansion/holding galaxies together as does dark matter,
  4. With Earth perhaps being one of these focal/converge points, I thought there must be some evidence of electron/positrons matter/antimatter, I remembered the Van allen belts, Which have two belts of electrons, Also the belts are believed to contain quite an amount of antimatter. And radiate large amounts of gamma radiation. The formation of these belts are not yet completely understood, Perhaps Photon collisions should not be completely ignored. There is much about light that we still do not understand. The Van Allen belts. http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/tour/AAvan.html
  5. There are many Gamma ray bursts from yet unknown sources, Perhaps some of these bursts are from these antimatter/matter clumps. http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmology/gammaray.html
  6. If photons pass through every point, Then every point is a focal point, Meaning billions of photons passing through every point at every moment. Earth is one large focal point. Every stars light/beam that as reached us converges on the planet earth. I am unsure of this, whether after collisions all matter/antimatter annihilate, Or are they scattered in different trajectories allowing matter to gravitate to matter. So maybe there are many of these clumps of matter through out our universe which may account for some of this missing/dark matter.
  7. I cannot see how they don't exist, Even on earth the light from ever observable star will converge on any point of the planet, Our planet being a focal point, But in space every point would be a focal point where photons cross paths.. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/may/18/matter-light-photons-electrons-positrons So I thought maybe over billions of years photon collisions at these focal points may be a factor in the formation of planets. So in effect multiplying 1MeV many billions of times at each point producing (matter).
  8. I am unsure about photons colliding from stars, But as there are 100's of billions of stars throwing out photons in every direction, At the focal points where all light/photons from stars converge,There must be Billions of photons colliding/passing through each other at any point in space? Each with energies of 1 MeV, Plus gamma ray photons, Are these energies multiplied by each other at focal points allowing collisions to happen producing many electron-positron pairs?
  9. I often wonder of the webs of light that we do not "see", If there is something we are still missing. I wonder about the focal points where all light from stars converge, Which would be mainly within galaxies, with webs stretching between galaxies. cosmic projectors.
  10. At a guess a. I would perhaps look for dark gamma ray bursts,http://www.universetoday.com/112489/alma-sheds-new-light-on-dark-gamma-ray-bursts/ b. I would guess it would depend on the size of supernova, c, Within galaxy of supernova, known black holes near by, Or perhaps galaxies centre black hole to see if there is any sudden change of energies. I am sure some one could find a test to see if the energies of a supernova are expelled to a different location. Years ago I did try and find connections between supernova and gamma ray bursts, There are more of these than most people realize, I did once find a supernova and a near by gamma ray burst where there was not a previous star in the area of burst.
  11. How do we test this? That is why vague notions expressed in words are useless. Perhaps first I would look for gamma ray bursts within the vicinity of supernova or why black holes sometimes expel energies, But I am sure there would be some way to test this idea. If we are now unsure about the formation of certain black holes, Perhaps first we do need new ideas which can then be tested by those with skill set to test ideas. I do not want to come across as a knocker of "math", I believe math is an important part of physics/science every day life, But as Swansont says it is a "component" to a theory, Perhaps the major component for prove to a theory. Sadly it is a language I am unable to completely grasp, Perhaps then I could put math to ideas, Ideas can be based on sound observations of collected data. But hopefully those with math could take someones idea and be able to apply math, Which I am sure as been done many a time.
  12. Well it looks like science is full of assumptions, And math can be made/created to fit any assumption. So just because the math fits does not make something any truer than a observation or a idea spelt out in words. There is a lot of observational evidence for black holes, So if black holes exist, It is the creation of these black holes we do not understand, Which I believe some smaller black holes are created by supernova, But it is not the star that becomes the black hole, But are caused by the star going nova tearing the space around said star (A RIP IN THE FABRIC OF SPACE/TIME), A black hole forms around the remaining mass/neutron star to remove this excess energy caused by the star going nova, Some Gamma ray bursts are these energies being moved to different areas of universe by these supernova black holes.
  13. http://www.universetoday.com/114802/there-are-no-such-things-as-black-holes/ I have my own thoughts on black holes, but in the past my ideas have been put down for no math, But one minute math says black holes exist and how they are formed, Then next math is saying they cannot exist. It seems that sometimes math can be made to say what ever it wants.
  14. http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/ams-space-experiment-sees-hints-dark-matter-particles-n206411 Yes dark matter is in galaxies (not mainly), It is also the greater mass that binds all galaxies together, has in the filaments you have already mentioned. Where ever there is a "pocket/bubble" of dark energy, There will be galaxies/clusters or small pockets of dark energy with just a few stars. The lead author of the Nature paper, Caltech astronomer Richard Massey, said the COSMOS study provides the best confirmation that dark matter determines "the underlying structure of space." Galaxies as well as primordial globs of gas and dust form "within this dark-matter scaffolding," he said.
  15. Some people think in "Math", While others think in Pictures", I know my ideas have their limits because I have very little math, But........ It is why I believe dark matter is mainly in intergalactic space between galaxies, Galaxies form in the bubbles of dark energy, Within these bubbles/pockets are small amounts of broken down dark matter which gives us our 5% of "ordinary matter" which make up the galaxies etc, The higher elements are still folded within the dark matter that surround these pockets, Higher elements are released the further the universe expands, As dark energy continues to flow into universe stretching and breaking down dark matter. We cannot create elements that do not yet exist at this present time of expansion. But are there folded in dark matter/space time.. Are Stars all what we believe they are, "dark matter cores" Could stars be dark matter crumbs that have been "shot blasted" of by the inflow of dark energy into these pockets, Allowing them to burst into life in these pockets of dark energy. The bigger the crumb/dark matter the larger the star. When you want to create a pearl in a oyster you add some "grit", Perhaps a crumb of dark matter within a nebula is that "grit" that attracts the hydrogen. Are the largest stars yet to come, which will have cores POTENTIALS of these highest elements, Not just up to iron. Astronomers using Hubble found the element boron in extremely ancient stars. suggesting boron dated back to the big bang.
  16. http://A Suggested Periodic Table up to Z ≤ 172, Based on Dirac–Fock Calculations Also there are a lot of top scientists/chemists who are leaning to a table with 172 elements Eric Scerri http://www.academia.edu/4033202/Cracks_in_the_Periodic_Table The amount of Dark energy "increases" as the universe expands, Yes, We do not know what dark energy is, But if its increasing as our universe expands, To me this implys Dark energy is outside our universe(what our universe bubble is expanding into). Black holes being the conduits that keep the universe expanding evenly, moving dark energy to different areas of universe sometimes consuming sometimes expelling these energies. When our universe is fully expanded out to Z172, Our universe takes its place as another Higgs particle, Along with other universes/multiverses becoming the Higgs field/Dark energy of another Fractal universe. Universes within universes.
  17. While looking at the creating of higher elements, I wondered if there is perhaps a limit at this time of our universe expansion, And we have reached that limit Z118/z119, Has I believe there are a possible 172 elements, These higher elements are what I believe is dark matter that as not yet broken down by the influx of dark energy into our expanding/stretching universe, It seems at the moment that 68.6% is the amount of dark energy in our universe or 68.6% expanded? I realized that 68.6% of 172 is 117.99 (Z118) which seems at this moment to be as far as we can go creating heavier elements. But sometime in the future it will be 99.999.....% DARK ENERGY, All dark matter broken down/expanded into all 172 elements. No more dark matter. A universe full of building blocks (171 elements) with Element 172 the "skin/shell" of our universe, Dark energy unable to expand our universe any more, Our universe along with countless others become the "dark energy" filling some other "universe". Oceans of fractal multiverses.
  18. I know nothing about bones, But when looking at them I thought of chicken, Which I know they are not, But they look light with what seems to be a large amount of air cavities, So could they be something like an Ostrich/emu?
  19. I am using google chrome, Still getting warnings, cannot enter any topic without warning, It is 11.20am uk. Tried to post with my tor browser but needed secure key. Details I am still getting. Should I change any google settings? Safe Browsing Diagnostic page for scienceforums.net/topic What is the current listing status for scienceforums.net/topic? Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer. Part of this site was listed for suspicious activity 3 time(s) over the past 90 days. What happened when Google visited this site? Of the 76 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 3 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2014-09-14, and the last time suspicious content was found on this site was on 2014-09-14. Malicious software includes 3 exploit(s). Successful infection resulted in an average of 13 new process(es) on the target machine. Malicious software is hosted on 1 domain(s), including yquerry.in.ua/. 1 domain(s) appear to be functioning as intermediaries for distributing malware to visitors of this site, includingmaskinnik.com/. This site was hosted on 1 network(s) including AS42831 (UKSERVERS-AS). Has this site acted as an intermediary resulting in further distribution of malware? Over the past 90 days, scienceforums.net/topic did not appear to function as an intermediary for the infection of any sites. Has this site hosted malware? No, this site has not hosted malicious software over the past 90 days. How did this happen? In some cases, third parties can add malicious code to legitimate sites, which would cause us to show the warning message. Next steps: Return to the previous page. If you are the owner of this web site, you can request a review of your site using Google Webmaster Tools. More information about the review process is available in Google's Webmaster Help Center. Updated 8 hours ago © Google - Google Home
  20. Sorry to open an old thread up, But wanted to ask a question and thought this thread was the best place to ask it. We all get weird ideas now and again, There are ideas that we are in a hologram also some cosmic computer etc, Which got me thinking again about the planet cores has the coil and the sun as the magnet, And whether on some level "solar systems" could be the power innards of a cosmic computer. And we are in the quantum level of a larger universe. Where we are smaller than quarks or maybe the higgs boson. So I know we use different gauges of wire for certain generators, And was wondering if we saw each planets cores has different gauges of wire, The largest gauge at center(mercury) then a second gauge wire(venus) up to eight gauges (8 planets). Each planets yearly orbit around the Sun equaling the numbers of windings, Mercury . . . 88 earth days Venus . . . 225 days Earth . . . 365 days Mars . . . 685 days Jupiter . . . 12 earth years Saturn . . . 29 years Uranus . . . 84 years Neptune . . . 165 years My question is "Would this type/amount of windings of coils work in a generator/cable or any other electrical/magnetic system around magnet/power source" ?
  21. In my opinion "propulsion engines" will only be used for short flights between planets in a solar system. Propulsion engines do not seem the way forward for "interstellar travel". When we talk about interstellar travel, I think that will come when we understand the universe better, There is still much yet unknown, Take the "holographic universe" The Fermi National Accelerator Lab near Chicago, once home to the historic Tevatron atom smasher, has a new toy: the Holometer. As its rather fancy name suggests, the Holometer is for testing whether our universe is actually a 2D hologram that’s painted on some kind of cosmological horizon, popping into 3D whenever we attempt to observe it http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/188727-pixels-of-the-universe-experiment-begins-to-see-if-the-universe-is-a-2d-hologram, This then could mean that instead of travelling vast distances, We could travel these distances by entering any part of the hologram, basically travelling inwards to reappear anywhere within universe/hologram. It will take a new science to take us to the stars, Not propulsion engines.
  22. I wish more people where like cats, They do not ask for much, But give their loyalty and love where ever it is needed. It is true some cats kill birds, Mine never did, It is the same has dogs they reflect their companions/owners. I always walk bare footed in my garden, I have never had to clean poop up from my garden, I have a small wild area where my cats go, At night I can have 6 or more cats sitting in my garden together, still never had cat mess. Or every found a dead bird/feathers and my garden is always full of birds. They all seem to have a understanding between themselves within my garden, I count myself lucky to sit in their company.
  23. This is a very hard one for me, I had two cats, 10yrs ago i was going through a very bad time, At this time I could not be around "people", I used to just sit in my garden wanting just to disappear, First came "fats" a neighbours cat who sat with me for hours on end, he now never leaves my side, Then came stitch a little kitten who slept in a tree in my garden who ran to my door each morning as I went to feed the birds, They would sit within inches of the birds but never once in all these years did they ever attempt to attack one, They understood my love for the birds, Little "Stitch" woke me every morning with a tap on my head, Then sat with me while the birds eat all around him, He has been ill for the last month, I had a feeding tube inserted but he just got worse, Yesterday I left him at the vets for a blood transfussion, but at 7.00PM Thet called to say he would not make it, I have just buried stitch under the tree where we first met, This as been the hardest day of my life, I am shattered, I live for nature, my home is a refuge where all life is welcome. No diseases or dead birds here. Just a Hermit who has lost a friend and companion. For Stitch I love and miss you x.
  24. I would be very surprised if there was not vast caverns formed as our molten core/mantle cools down, Perhaps around our core are vast molten bubble chambers that countries and oceans would fit within. But i suppose these would be between the mantle/crust,
  25. Has I believe our universe to be an "Electron", Which would mean we are within everything and everything is within us, We exist within the uni/multi-verse and the uni/multi-verse exists within us. We are all a balance of all there is, Our physical forms are a projection of that balance, We are within every life/non life form, Which is also within us. It is why I hold all life precious. We are walking talking Multi-universal beings. Experiencing this universe together, Each part adding to the whole. WHAT IS ABOVE IS ALSO BELOW.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.