sunshaker

Do you believe the "electron" also exists in the past as well as the future? Where you say the "electron is the identical antiparticle", It reminds me of the one electron universe, Some where along the lines of Positron=past, Proton=present, Electron=future, 3 states of a proton.

I have always liked the idea of Earth as a living organism, To believe we exist just upon a "rock in space" is cold & sad to me. I think life is earths offspring, We are worlds, host to trillions of bacteria, If these bacteria had telescopes they would see us all has moving worlds full of life. Not all children look like their parents. She changes her children to fit the world/entity she is becoming The Earth a parent, just lost most of her children to an extinction event(asteroid impact) which you had no control over, She would create children with intelligence, to do what she could not do with nature, So she created us with the abilities to protect ourselves she gave us "science", To do what she cannot. We are her children, And sometimes children do not listen to their parents.

Fields within fields Our quantum, Is someone else's Atomic. Atomic within the quantum, Quantum within the atomic, Everything is relative to our place. Symmetry between the tables. My Joining of two extended periodic tables z172 (Top Quark to Anti top Quark) Each element as a anti partner that adds to 172+1 protons/electrons. A top quark has 173x the mass of a proton. 173 billion electron volts. Each opposing elements have 173 protons (combined mass 173 GeV). When these tables/quarks join they rebalance out to 172 x 172 +1 Releasing +1 shown in green a particle/quark of mass 172 GeV 172 proton/electrons It is the joining of these tables/quarks that create this composite field of the top/anti quark(172 by 172). This is showing multiple tables/quark joined in a field. Each Z with a circle is one table/quark. Top Quark field. j

I was wondering if someone can explain this in simple terms Composite numbers congruent to +-1 mod 6. 25, 35, 49, 55, 65, 77, 85, 91, 95, 115, 119, 121, 125, 133, 143, 145, 155, 161, 169, 175, 185, 187, 203, 205, 209, 215, 217, 221, 235, 245, 247, 253, 259, 265, 275, 287. Doh,I get it now, after writing this down I was just trying to better understand these composite numbers(green) that came up on the prime line of this wave and why primes(yellow) other than 2/3 all fall on this line? Is it easier to work out these composite numbers than to work out primes? Is there a simple way to work these(composite numbers +-1mod 6) out. So in effect following this line, crossing out composite numbers +-1mod 6, And what you are left with will be primes? Edit:, LINE 1,3 Are even numbers(no primes), Line 4, "Odd" multiples of 6 start +3(no primes). Is there a simple way of writing all this in a equation?

I was just having a read on the Van Allen belts, I seen this about dissolving the inner belts, But from what I can gather we still do not fully understand these belts, I have read these belts add protection against solar winds, And a weakening of these belts could harm electronics and organisms, and influence the Earths magnetic fields. With the need for more and more satellites and cost of shielding I can see this becoming a reality. Personally I believe we should leave well alone, Most things are normally there for a good reason, Sometimes reasons we do not yet understand. It brings to my mind how we chopped down trees without a thought, Before we understood their place, and how important they are to our very existence. But my question is who or what body would have the authority to dissolve/drain these belts?

Mystery solved, I agree 100%. Still much to explore, Maybe next time.

It is the only photo I have seen but on different sites, 1 of many. http://ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/ancient-irish-cross-slabs-carved-in.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_ Which i would normally take with a pinch of salt, But the above photo I posted seems to be an original nasa photo, But I could be wrong. http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/m/3720/1M458433044EFFCEQKP2955M2M1.HTML

Keep seeing this image of a cross on mars taken by opportunity?, Maybe impression left by opportunity, Or Fake? http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/1/m/3720/1M458433044EFFCEQKP2955M2M1.HTML edit: opportunity rover

'Impossibly Bright' Dead Star Should Technically Not Exist http://phys.org/news/2014-10-ultraluminous-pulsar-nustar-impossibly-bright.html This is another reason why I think it is not always the star/nova That becomes the "black hole", But the space around certain stars(gravity well) that has fractured/tore allowing energies to be expelled from these tears/fractures(from different areas of universe) as well as consumed. Similar to when you pull the plug to empty a sink, Drop say a table tennis ball into the sink and it will swirl in plug hole put not pass through, The star is the ball in the fractured gravity well drawing in surrounding space/energies. If the fracture comes in contact with another fracture/s or pocket of Dark energy the energies could be expelled into our space from around the neutron star, Allowing the pulsar to shine beyond it's mass potential.Hence it's capability to shine a 100 times brighter than theory allows. SUPERNOVA WITH NEARBY PULSAR GIVING OF 100 TIMES MORE ENERGY THAN THEORY ALLOWS ARE THE TWO CONNECTED? This pulsar was only brought to light while scientists where looking at a nearby supernova, As I believe black holes are formed after a supernova to move energies to different areas of galaxy, I believe this extra energy coming from this m82 pulsar originates from this supernova (dubbed sn2014j).

Watching illusions always makes me feel how much of our every day life may be full of illusions, Do we always see what we believe we see? A longer video slightly, A few interesting parts, America tricked into building over 2000 bombers after russia replayed a few bombers in a airshow going past a camera multiple times.

sunshaker, on 26 Sept 2014 - 12:57 PM, said: I have a thought that it is the "space" around the star where a black hole forms, After a supernova i believe the space is stretched to breaking point, depending on size of star, If the Star is large enough and the gravity well deep enough, The resulting explosion will rip the fabric of space within the gravity well. Something like simple picture below. It is only a thought, Why I have put it into speculation.

I know there are large collections of electrons in the Van Allen belts 2 to 3 rings, Are these in a coherent state within these magnetic fields? Or is this just about plasma the waves? http://www.spacenewsfeed.co.uk/index.php/news/218-van-allen-probes-shed-light-on-decades-old-mystery

All numbers are the same as yours except going into the negative, I can see where you mean though, The bottom left positive I have typed in 17 twice instead of 17/18. This 2 dimensional wave helps me to see a larger process, The arrows from each positive to it's equal negative, -1 >1, -2 >2, -3>3 etc, As opposites attract, Canceling each another to zero, Then I was thinking along the lines of a 90 degree turn/twist when then we would have positive to positive, Negative to negative with would repel, Causing a continuous cycle at each turn/twist, It is still a thought at the moment, but it is something to build on, still looking how it all fits together. When i click on the picture, it enlarges so I see all numbers clearly, it may depend upon your monitor size, Here is an xl link, with it in but no lines. https://alphaomegadotme.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/new-1cm-grida.xls

Some prime sine waves, So I can view them easier to help build a better understanding of these waves and the reasons for all the primes settling on certain lines depending on the wave. All even numbers removed. primes L2,L3 all primes L1 Except 2.3. Negative and positive will cancel down to zero/Point.

If it is the centrifugal force of a planet that stops it falling into the sun, When in a planets history was this force first brought into being, Is it possible that planets formed further away from our sun/star, Until our sun gravity started acting upon said planet giving its initial speed to maintain their closer stable orbits?

Thanks for pointing links out, I was aware of this link, But i missed the others, I think the coloured numbers through me after pressing a few thinking they may be links. I did notice them though after i read through a couple of times, It sometimes takes a while to see another persons views and to understand them, But we are not that far apart, Just coming from different directions. I had a quick look at the fib numbers within your sine wave, Unsure whether they offer to much to this wave, I do though believe that looking into the negative will help to tie things together, When I look at a certain types of waves only going 1 direction, I see only part of the whole. As with your great circles, If you start at any point you will come back to that point, Waves going neg+pos At this time there are 118 known elements with 119 just around the corner, 92 of these occurring naturally, With lead 82 the highest stable element, I extended my table to 172 elements, Which I believe will be the maximum(at least for this present universe). With Radon 86 midway. 31+55=86 Perhaps not mathematically proper, But I can see what you are saying, Perhaps something I may have tried. At moment just playing with trying different ways to visualize your sine waves, In different dimensions. A small section of one,

I have had a tinker with paint net and you can come up with something in a few minutes and no mess. I enjoy art but do not enjoy cleaning up afterwards, do you ever use any software tools for art? Heres a couple I prepared earlier DOT FIRE AND WATER Easy for people like me with limited skills.

Have you any drawings/diagrams anywhere to view? Some of mine can be found here, Where i dump stuff to view latter. http://alpha-omega-sunshaker.blogspot.co.uk/ PS I do like your sine wave going into the negative, gives me something else to think on.

I do not believe that prime numbers represent gravity, Has with other number sequences, I believe are waves that interact with how I see the fabric of our expanding universe, As in a wave passing through a bronze bell will be different to a wave passing through a iron bell etc , If a single particle contains all elements, What sort of wave would be created passing through this particle? With would contain the ordered primes, To me this is how i see your sine wave. Which I also agree with, As I tried to suggest, Within the elements/extended periodic table, Which show the most continuous order of these primes within the first 80(stable elements). Look passed elements just as "elements". Into quantum levels and beyond. I am far from seeing the universe as "flat", I see expansions within expansions, Which tubes fit in quite well, I see cycles within cycles end/beginning/end/beginning etc These drawings are just showing 2 dimensions of a multi dimensional structure, Layers upon layers. You can see the waves expanding out from within, These would be like twisted tubes. This structure is what I believe makes up the underling structure to the fabric of space, Each "Z" Is a complete table of elements from Z1 to Z172, It is the joining of these tables/strings that allows the next cycle to begin. These structures are within each particle/virtual particle, (universes within the smallest) a continuous cycle. . I was also thinking about your sine wave running into the negative?

I enjoyed it, I can see what Ophiolite and Strange have said about grammar and style, Put another chapter up, Let them correct it, You will soon see where you can improve, By the 3rd 4th chapter they will be begging to see what happens next .

No, It was just something I was using to find to find patterns in number sequences, Taking the difference between each number until I reached the point, I tried it with the primes/fib etc, But I was surprised when I tried it with L1 From the wave below, As i have already done just using the primes (L3) and L2 being +2 I did not expect from L1 seemingly random numbers to get this automata This is where it gets hard, This is where I believe the "Elements/periodic table/electrons come into play, As in the automata above, It starts to break down at 82/above, This I believe is to do with the last stable element (lead/82), It is why i believe primes begin to drop of. Primes within extended periodic table(electron seq), Mirrored each side of 45, except for a few shown in white which are the first fib primes. I do not look at the periodic table as just a "group of elements", It is just another building block that fits together on quantum levels, I have found many waves within these tables, I believe your sine waves are another piece to put the puzzle together. Here was when i tried to fit multiple tables together, This is something how I see fabric/membrane, With waves expanding out. To me there is a lot to try and tie together, And many ways to look at the same problem, Which I hope to look into more, I am always looking for such patterns. Got to find a way to get rid of the non primes on prime row, Any numbers ending with 5 or 0 could miss out, But I know that is not the answer. There is a reason/way just need to find it.

"I" think its interesting, And do myself believe there is something between the primes/gravity creating some fabric on the quantum levels, electrons/quarks and beyond, I think numbers are thought of as non-physical-entities(abstract) but I believe they are more physical entities, That do create these triangles/cubes/circles that are the fabric of our multi/universe. Finding ways to prove this in science is the problem, To see those little numbers just click on pictures and they enlarge.

I think there is something within doing the primes within these waves, The wave i adapted from cixe's top set of waves, gives primes at bottom in yellow, +2 in green, then I was left with top row in blue, I put this top row/blue into a automata, it came out symmetrically even, What that means i am unsure yet. automata of difference in top row

I only have simple maths skills, But this looks interesting, I am still at the bottom It is interesting how all the primes are on line 2, Is there something to the spacing of the non primes on line 2? How far have you taken this line? might be stupid but why is 31 bracketed? I had a go at a wave , primes yellow, +2green,

Heres a couple I use, I suppose it depends what you are looking for. https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/meta/authors.html http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/lists.html http://www.psyche.com/psyche/links/dimensionality.html http://consc.net/resources.html