illuusio

I calculated the mass of photon. If I make hypothesis that there is a mass, then E_tot = E_kinetic + E_rotational. I chose wavelength and it's energy (122 nm & 10.16 eV). I approximated that radius of photon is roughly 0.8 fm. The result was 3.6e-35 kg. Current estimates say that upper limit for photon's mass is roughly 1-e54 kg. Problem with current measurements is that they are based on current knowledge of gravitation and EM. Therefore those limits are not valid. Actually if I reduce kinetic energy (and use only "rest mass") from total energy my result agrees with E=mc^2 nicely (within appr accuracy). More details can be found from my signature. To be more clear. Photon energy is purely rotational energy if mass is at rest.

I did not applied patent for PMM. It just happens to be a byproduct.

It is possible to build PMM, I have done it already. I have applied patent (not for PMM) but PMM is byproduct of the invention. You can thank Iodine, when she gave me a ban I was almost releaving my experiment on ether, which has a big part in my invention. During the ban, I got informed that I shouldn't disclose my experiment because of patent laws.

Dude... I mean.. dude! What was I saying... ou.. dude!... shoorms are for free

It's not too late for you to catch up the train. You are living in the past, dude.

Wow, it's like a watching painted wall to dry Only one maybe. I have a little teaser with me, actually two.. Coulomb law redo and I calculated photon's mass edit: I give four more days to step up. After that I go solo or with available members.

Yes, in case of open thread collaboration. Written contract is needed before collaboration can proceed and the work is done in privacy. At least I prefer private collaboration.

Good questions! To the first question, yes, my share would be an equal tenth. Patents have nothing to with the theory. Having patent even don't need any theory as long as it works. However there is few other patent ideas (not applied yet) which I'm willing to share with my collaborators. Those ideas need more investigation (time & money) than previous ones. To the last question, be my quest If I'm right, there is no fear of your scenario. And besides that, I have my previous patent application on my name. To me glory is secondary. Of course it would be awesome to pick up Physics Nobel and give a speech (with my collaborators of course). But the main driver is money. Nobel prize money at the moment is about 1 MEur so that won't do the trick, so dividing it with few other people is just fine with me. I'm after bigger bucks.

Obviously somebody has been left on the station Train went away... a lot has changed since we last talked on the thing.

You have rights to your opinion.

That's right we should call that the ToEbi effect or with my name... Xxxxxxx effect.

Magnus effect.

Do I really have to answer? The deeper nature is phenomenon common to gravitation, EM and strong interaction.

At some level you might think particles as a fields. If you want to understand nature deeper, that thought won't cut it. And yes, field "moves" within itself.

It will generate huge arguments when it's time to cash collected credits, maybe even lawsuits. I think that nobody wants that. Open collaborating is nice idea, but only with certain restrictions. No credit is given anybody else but original members of the collaboration team. Do you think that there is any person (outside from team) who is willing to give feedback with previous stated restriction? I doubt it. Only mud throwing is guaranteed. Further I can't promise anything from behalf of future collaboration team. At the moment there is one person interested in collaborating (if the goal is reasonable with time resources).

Well, sounds like a hand waving to me. There is movement for sure. If QM doesn't care for it, QM won't need it. That has it's consequences.

To that first part, you may think in that way. But there is one other problem with open thread collaboration. When somebody contributes a bit, like pointing an error in calculus, should (s)he get equal amount of credit for that? It would be simpler way to have a private thread collaboration. Let the science community do the peer reviewing I meant obviously Iodine! BTW, is here even technically possible to have a private area?

I'm gonna fight against the odds (sorry about that smiley) Math is all ready existing, at least in it's rudiment form. What's with the smilies? They look a bit silly but so what? Is it generation issue? or just a personal preference? Actually I came up with that same claim of being seriously taken argument in Finnish science forum (tiede.fi). What else? Can I drive my SUV or does it me less good (at least selfish because of collision safety)? If I use suit, is it ok? if I use sneakers and sweatsuit when I'm on my yard and so on... What I had in my mind was an area or thread only accessible to collaborators. Only to prevent unnecessary angle shooting and distractions. There are benefits in case of "open" thread collaboration but is the price too high? And Iovane is after me all the times... I'm so afraid of her. Mmm... sharing fame. I don't know, to me equal amount is sufficient. How come? Well, I'm not after the fame, I really don't. Life after brought to spotlight ain't easy. Some people don't realize that but I do. There is all kinds of people out there who can do stupid things in order to get their faces into a fame of some kind Also your privacy is reduced if you are a public figure. I'm at the money and that I'll get mostly from my applications. Why that money isn't enough to you, why driving the Thing? Good question... I don't know exactly. Maybe after getting engaged to it I can't get rid of it. Hmm.. why indeed? I have came back time after time But I have learn as a byproduct. I'm not looking anybody to give up current theories. I'm looking further, more detailed understanding, the theory behind current theories.

Of course not! I need person(s) capable of creating solid scientific articles, experiments and so on. Fame and money is split equally. When things go as planned we have to have written agreement on everything. I'm a honest man (Finnish people are) so no need to be concerned of anything bad or hidden agenda.

Haha... This is serious topic, so please, give me some respect here I'm looking for people ready to collaborate with me. Or do you really want me alone collect physics Nobel prize in the near future?

Join the club! I hate that too. Better phrase would be the Grand Theory or XXXXX. Well... you know me and my ideas. Because my thing is powerful in means of prediction power, I must conclude that thing is the Thing. QM is subset of it and same goes with the relativity theories.

That's correct. I predict that few constants will be explained and will be calculated, like G and magnetic constant. Otherwise life goes on

If you insist Actually it might be much easier with current theories. I mean when ToE is found (in science world) there will be awful amount of work at hand Actually I predict that when ToE is found we'll live with the new theory but we'll continue using old theories because they are practical.

I was too hasty. Theory itself is not wrong. It works great to it's limits. But ripping off physical basis from elements leads current and future physicists into dead end.

I got an idea! Yes another one. Could we do history here at SF? In means of collaboration (on the Thing)? Here is very educated and smart people. Obviously many of you likes speculations Could we create a private section here for the collaboration? Everybody capable of distributing (math, knowledge, hardware resources, experiments, articles and so on) is welcome. I'm serious here. Only open mind is required.