illuusio

In "slow" compression they compress mainly into photons and to smaller material (E***r particles) and energy is distributed to all over. Singularity, nah, that train went few billion years ago. You can use particle colliders they show what happens with too much "compression".

Few pointers... If gravitation can take over strong force to me it sounds that they both are based on same phenomenon. Another thing is compressing quarks together. Because baryons do have rotation frequency, compressing them together (into contact), would cause them to annihilate before compressed together. Same applies to quarks (because quarks generate baryons rotation frequency). To some extend you can compress baryons together but there is a limit for sure.

Obviously you Nobrainer suffer from the same space dementia as I do I like your wave theory, partially. Waves and interference are everywhere even within gravitation BUT (and this is big but) waves alone won't do it. Those waves are blown away when two objects interact violently in space. Waves might take part in smaller scale gravitational events like with satellite orbiting Earth and so forth. With bigger events I would count on Magnus effect in ether. Edit: waves and Magnus effect are not exclusive... so what a heck, no buts, I like your wave theory. I do have my own theory as you know but waves fit in nicely.

So, any peer reviewers in tha house? ajb? Phi?

OP was asking the mechanism. It's vague to say that those fields can carry momentum etc at least to me.

There is the same topic in speculations area already. It concluded nothing.

Question was to Phi. I do know your attitude already. But if you read it, what is your reasoning behind that statement? What part is nonsense and why? Read the latest version. If you refer to two months old discussions you will be badly informed.

You mean that iodine pm? Well, that was pure frustration due to my own time resource restrictions. My bad, no question about it. I'll make it up to iodine in the future, cos she did something that saved me from a lot of possible trouble. I learned during the ban that if I disclose my patent application premature there won't be any change to get any serious compensation in case of someone is violating my invention before patent is given. Only given patent allows me to get serious compensation in case of patent violation. So... there was something good from my stupid behaviour. But as I said, I'll make it up to iodine and it won't happen again.

I have listened you alright. It's quite hard to conclude that you sincerely are excited about my theory. But if I'm wrong then my apologies. I give you a new opportunity So, have you read the latest version? What you think about it?

Interesting to see your reactions when my theory is either published or I have made commercial product(s) based on it. I bet you haven't read the latest version, have you?

I did mistakes in every way, sure! I'm a human being, making mistakes come as a feature

Yep, you indeed helped, thanks for that! At that time I wasn't ready with my theory. In current version there is third law which must be used in case of experiments like the bike wheel experiment, so no problem with bike wheels anymore So you don't hate my theory... I don't buy that. For example you don't allow own topic for ToEbi, even it's much more mature and powerful. To me, you hate it.

Thanks! Those bring some golden memories You can see how my theory develops in time.

Well... few modes hate the thing but the paper is about the theory of everything. Originally I tried to explain only gravitation but soon I realized that the same phenomenon applies to strong interaction and EM interaction. I realized that there is torsion field (ether) even it's banned from science at least the term ether I found some evidence to support my ideas and I did more experiments of my own. You can download the paper from my signature or I can send it to you. The main point in my theory is that gravitation constant G isn't constant at all. It is totally depended on object's rotational frequency. With that idea the rest was "easy".

That's true there wasn't proper journal for my paper but I thought technologies journal would be close enough. Thousand bucks? I'm not aware of this

Excellent post! With one journal, panel of people (referees?) checked the paper but at that point they rejected with few tips with the paper. But that happened two months ago, so my paper wasn't that good at that point. MDPI 's submission process requires that you must fill five reviewers otherwise you can't submit. And yes that's all I'm asking for.

I do know that. But editors in those journals are too damn busy and they don't take chances with speculative theory. I have tried couple of those. viXra is one option also but I don't think it has as much weight than for example arXiv. MDPI requires five names but they necessarily don't use them all if any. WOW! Put "theory of everything" into Google search and be amazed!!! ToEbi at the first page! It seems that that happened only in Finland

If I go public in MDPI I would need a five qualified peer reviewers to my theory. Do we have objective candidates here? I mean by objective that you can have any opinion on my work but it has to be reasonable. Actual theory is like only eight pages so it's not too much of a work. So fellows... I need five names and your email addresses (in PM). I think that I'm not allowed to offer any kind of reward for doing peer reviewing BUT the reward is got by other means (from involvement). I can info anonymous head count in this thread almost real-time. Lines are open! Aaa... arXiv is an other option! I think that I need only one person who can give endorsement for me. So I can use that also if I can find endorser. Actually I asked endorsement from Garrett Lisi, I had to

Hmm... should I answer to this one? Maybe not What a heck.. here we go... I think that those parts, at the first place, are physical, tiny but physical. They are shaped like a toothed spheres. Rest is easy.

Very nicely answered

How come? I mean first of all, electrons orbiting nucleus weaken the strong interaction's ability to keep nucleus in one part. Second, magnetized material crystal can be demagnetized. To me that tells magnetic field experiences third law.

Right... can I have definitions for those terms? or link? please.

Marilyn Manson is antichrist? And the news is? If you are from Europe, shame on you! You could do better.

Based on purely seeing that video clip first frame... How object knows that it shouldn't go faster and dangering itself? Sounds weird to me, can you answer that? I didn't watch the video (I'm too lazy and I have too short attention spin).

No it's not. My problem is ( hehe) that I'm not involved in science world in profession. I do have a degree (M.sc.) but my daytime job is with commercial softwares (and btw I'm NOT a programmer, at least for 10 years). My time resources are limited but to my curse I'm impatient person. Nice combination... not. So out of pure frustration I might be quite provocative from time to time. That ain't helping me either Result is that most people here in SF think that I'm as you described deluded, self-righteous, ignorant and poorly educated fool. What can you do? Another thing is, even that I'm right with my theory, I do accept that my ideas and theory is somewhat ahead of it's time. But I do have an ace in my sleeve I have few inventions which prove me right and as a bonus generate some serious cash flow. Time will tell which happens first, serious attention to my theory or commercial products based on my theory.