Jump to content

Gilded

Senior Members
  • Posts

    2480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Gilded

  1. Cobalt is also a nice thing to cover an atomic bomb with; it transforms into isotope 60 taking enhanced fallout to whole new level. And I do know that cobalt-60 is used in food sterilisation.

     

    David Hahn a.k.a. the Radioactive Boyscout. :) The guy who built his own breeder reactor (in his stepmother's garden shed :> ).

  2. Hmmh? If zinc has a 0.133nm radius, then where does the 0.5nm average radius of atoms come from? Are the heavier elements so much wider? I'm not sure about other pages/books, but whenever I've found info about atoms, it says that the average is about 0.5nm

  3. You don't want to put too much though, if you're firing a mortar it may A) blow it apart B) snuff out the fuse. You might wanna try that with a mortar filled with flour or something, and see how high it flies. :P And then you can calculate how much delay you need for it to explode when it's at the highest point. If you're even making mortars at all, that is. :)

  4. Well, at least it's fun to bet your friend for 5€ or so for "will the ice cube sink or not". :) And for cooling, it has a higher boiling point. And by the way, the cooling rods (usually cobalt or so) are a nuclear reactor's actual moderators. The D2O is just for the cooling I guess, not to moderate the chain reaction.

  5. I've heard about a theory where (as MadScientist stated) consciousness lies in the very, very sub-atomic levels, and can actually do superposition (which means existing at two places at the same time), which would explain "expanded consciousness". Does anyone know more about it?

  6. "H2O2 --> H2O --> D2O"

     

    Errr... Do you mean H2O2 + H2O = D2O? I can't see that happening, since you had to make a neutron out of somewhere and have it accompany the lonely proton of the hydrogen-1 to make it hydrogen-2.

     

    "but why is D2O any better than H2O?"

     

    It's... heavy. :) It's fun to A) cool reactors with it, as you said B) make ice cubes out of it (it sinks in water, hence the name heavy water). Heavy water is a great addition to any element collection. It's not even hazardous (at least not too hazardous), and not radioactive like tritium.

     

    "Not to spoil anybodys fun but read forum info by blike."

     

    Piranha bath? Yes, bud stated that it's rather dangerous (and it has been stated several times that it reacts violently and dissolves your freaking hand in a couple of seconds. :P ).

  7. If a chemical reaction doesn't have the capability to blow off four limbs and at least 3/4 of your face, it's not worth trying. :)

     

    The sand or a proper brush is fine, but if you do something with a compound that has a nasty habit of sticking onto things, maybe some sort of acid is a better option.

  8. Hmm... I think it's the impurities that form the fumes. And when the fume is gone, the impurities are gone. :)

     

    Edit: Whoopsie! Of course, if dense fumes start appearing in the early parts of boiling, they're probably some impurity crap, but if they appear in the later part, they are most likely H2O + SO3. So when the H2O + SO3 starts to fume out, you've got yourself some damn conc. acid.

  9. "piranha bat"... I think I'm not going to sleep well tonight. *shivers* Hehe, no, just kidding. Tpyo is on laughnig mttaer. :)

     

    I've heard that piranha bath is good for cleaning test tubes, I'd recommend H2SO4 though. And you can dissolve someone you hate in a bath tub of it! Or, you could smite a nearby pine table with it (pour some extra for ol' Gilded :D ).

  10. How are you gentlemen. All your base... ehh, I mean hello.

     

    I've been around for a while (as you may have noticed), but I'm still a forum noob and I haven't exactly posted anything in this thread... So, hi. :)

     

    I'm from Finland (no, we don't have polar bears here!), and I'm usually rather bitchy about it, since it sucks to live here and I'm planning to move to the U.S. or UK as soon as I can. :D

     

    My favourite area of science is chemistry (especially radiochemistry), and I found the Oh-So-Magnificent Science Forums when I searched more info about the Radioactive Boyscout-case. I think there was a thread about it in the chemistry forum, and so, here I am. :)

  11. Ok, so the crystal structure causes the light to ricochet around and makes the diamond act as a prism. That's one effect you won't notice too much since diamonds are usually damn small (I have a greenish one that I bought for about 10€ that's almost too small to be seen without a magnifying glass :) ). But I (and pulkit) still don't have an explanation why some things are transparent/clear and some are not. :|

  12. With "we", I meant everyone else than FBI etc. if it's really such a material as I have described. :) And the reason we don't know, is most likely A) There's no such thing as red mercury (at least not the kind that can be a fission device substitute) or B) The _GOVERNMENT_ doesn't want the public to know about it. :)

  13. Hmm, that's a good question. Since the carbon diamonds inside a diamond share their electrons with four other carbon atoms, does it keep the electrons in place so well that the diamond A) doesn't conduit electricity B) let's light through? I know A and B are true but I'm not sure why. :|

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.