Fuzzwood

Vacuum doesnt imply there is no gravity

Making a mountain out of molehill here. It is a simple problem. Deserving a simple solution. I'm using ratios between sides and angles. They are both related. Sure it trig, but you don't have to use a calc to solve this problem.

 

Fswd: He brought the "God" topic up.

That is exactly what the tan function does, but different, as you cant divide metres by angles cuz the goniometric functions need to be fed dimentionless figures to get angles, which you get by for example divide metres on eachother.

Oh well i'm using tan just in a wrong form.

You arent using it at all.

Apparently you need one as i stated: your tower is 8 metres too high.

Then why is your answer 8 metres too long? Tan(52)*100 gives the proper answer.

Did you even look at the site or is this going to be another god + sun topic in which you refuse to read any offered material?

Another way is leading HOOH over a platinum or copper catalyst.

So in final you'll get

[math]

2^{3^{x^2}} \ln{2} * 3^{x^2} \ln{3} * 2x

[/math]

right? I always sucked at these things, but i want to know if i can finally do it too

If they are heat-resistant, put them upside down in an oven on 250 degrees C or so.

Its simple actually: neutralize acetic acid with sodium hydroxide and evaporate the water.

The moment you add some type of energy conversion, the energy will be converted and will get less over time

/me smacks a few kittens with Newton's 1st law of physics.

I really dont see the problem with this. Dont get me wrong, sometimes Greenpeace does good things (sometimes they are just hypocritical; steaming with a diesel powered boat around oil rigs to make them stop drilling ), but other times i think they are a bunch of whiners.

Actually, you just added a layer of unpolished glass to your beaker. Glass is called sodiumboronsilicate

m*g = F, not weight. Stop dragging physics in simple chemistry equations

Can I presume G=6, O=0, and D=5

Or is it a multiplication of GOD which makes 605?

actualy i've been thinking about this...but hopefully i could find somebody to give me a solid explanation.. because I did know organic compund is composed of many such as phenol, alcohols, hydrocarbon(easy word,element that contain carbon ) and etc... but my Organic Chemistry practical questioning us like such.. I've try to pull in all organic compound so that a derivation of a symbolized equation will be happen but it seems....huh! please anyone....

Oxidation of an organic compound (like burning) tries to put every atom in its highest oxidational state. We can say when something like methane, (C -4, H+1) is burned, we get CO₂ (C +4, O -2) and H₂O (H +1, O -2).

When we burn chloroform, CHCl₃ (which doesn't burn so good as the C is already +3), you could still say that the Cl can be oxidized up to +7. It yields ClO₄^-.

What i mean with the + and - a number, i give the oxidation state of that particular atom. I know this analogy is wrong when looking at covalent bonds, but it is a good way to explain these things.

Erm, it spins?

Save 1 tiny ice crystal though, to use that as a seed. Warm the solution till the point that the stuff just dissolves, then add the crystal and have something nearby to rapidly cool the mixture.

well the Vid would be more trouble than it`s worth the files even for 10 seconds always end up Massive!, as for the design, I can give you my parts list and explain how and why they go together, sure

Thats why they invented codecs

It can use one of its free electron pairs, which, in turn, puts a negative charge on the entire ring.

Aha, basically you are saying: wt* is electrochemistry?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrochemistry

And besides, most animals seem to get agitated when that kind of stuff is going to happen.

It's a bit "old school" but that reaction works quite well. The other dominant product is sulphur vapour but I don't think that would blacken PbCl2.

I don't see why it's not the conditions I described; I passed H2S over moist PbCl2 and it went black.

In principle all reactions are reversible so while it's fair to say that the reaction would usually give lead chloride and a nasty smell it can be driven the other way.

It actually could:

S + 2e- --> S^2-

2Cl^- --> Cl₂ + 2e-

And no, not all reactions are reversible: can you put the same CO₂ and H₂ back together into C₈H₁₈ and oxygen?

Why not? Would you expect fission?

I can give you two guidelines that always apply:

Always double-check what you write

Always use the appropriate units when calculating stuff.

What are you trying to ask anyway? First it is relativity, then chemistry, and now psychology...

luk @ meh i can zbell wortz