Fuzzwood

How do people come up with this? My guess is some psychoactives are involved... Furthermore: citation needed which is NOT posting your own website with the exact same unbased stuff.

Or one electron too many. See how annoying H is?

It takes no weird deity or whatever thought up supernatural thing to understand humans are social creatures through natural selection.

Just to clarify. Inorganic does NOT mean that the compound did not come from an organism. Organic compounds are classified as having a carbon skeleton, i.e. molecules containing C-C bonds. And also, I can't see a plant somehow using a precursor for whatever product if neither is part of some metabolic pathway in the plant.

No, no it can't.

Unity, like-minded people. Basically giving you the feeling you are not alone out there.

Same thing really.

They were sent to Jupiter and Saturnus. Wikipedia could tell you that.

Then prove so. All I am seeing now is a little child which is not getting its way.

What evidence do you have for that statement? Calculations would be a start. And that brown star stuff is already behind schedule. Shouldn't something have happened at 2012-12-21?

x^2 + x^2 + x + x + 2 - x^2 + 2x + 4 = 45 <-- this line is wrong. Do you know why? Furthermore 8,9,10 is not the only solution to this question. You will find out why later.

Aaaaaand that's the end of the discussion. To me you are one of those whiny kids that go "LaLaLa I can't hear you" while putting their fingers in their ears like some.... let's stay civilized...

The fact that human and mouse embryonic cells are quite different. A therapy which would work with the latter could very well not work with the former for instance. Furthermore, to my knowledge the used human fetal stem cells were harvested after said fetus was aborted and thus already dead.

A-theist --> anti theist --> non believer. Ergo an atheist does not believe. Don't make it sound like an atheist does. Kindly try to refrain from engaging into scientific discussion where you claim something to exist without providing tangible proof.

Thank you, iNow, for your support and carrying on my point.

Because this thread started with the ridiculous approach that science in the end serves god. It does not. It serves mankind as there is no god. God is an entity made up by man who couldn't and still cannot think for themselves and rather shovel their responsibilities on this non-existant entity.

Not quite, I can show you how to start a religion, which, like all, is based on utter made-up nonsense and also provide ways for schisms to evolve. If you are offended by that, you have every right to be. Just as I have every right at free speech as long as I don't insult a person directly. A religion is not a person.

Well as opposed to the christian god; let me introduce you to Fred the furret who constructed the entire universe 20 milliseconds ago.

Well?

What can you deduce from the fact that you get sodium chloride in the 2nd reaction?

Look at what they usually eat, in terms of size.

Depends on the amount, but redissolving it in as little solvent as possible, sucking it out with a pasteur pipette and transfer it in a small container, blowing an airstream over it to evaporate the solvent can work. That's how I recover 100 mgs of compound.

Just look up the Carnot related formulas. You didn't put any effort in using them as far as I have seen.

PLEASE SHOW SOME OF YOUR OWN RESEARCH FIRST

You again? Why don't you apply that theory on your own mass?