Fuzzwood

No, it won't go like that. Kindly look up the difference between sound and EM waves.

Proof or it didn't happen.

No it won't work. Reasons were given plentiful.

Well, we can't, physics doesn't allow you or anyone else. Can't you take that for an answer or will you keep repeating yourself until you get a yes? Also, what is your obsession with a made-up religious figure? And: But seriously, start reading the material provided.

Well duh. That's the regime you are working in. Why should we try to answer the same question over and over again while you don't seem to put any effort into reading the theories about the very thing you are trying to discuss here? Although you do me too much credit, I am only a chemical engineer. No gods there, just Heisenberg and Einstein. Although their mathematical prowess do exceed those of the mortal man... Atoms jiggle since the beginning of time (or at least since hydrogen was formed after the big bang). Slap a photon against any atom and it will jiggle a bit faster for a while before losing that energy by emitting a photon or through non-radiative decay (e.g. heat). Touch a fluorescent tube once it has been switched on for a while. Feel the warmth? The reason of it heating up I mentioned in this very paragraph.

Indeed, thanks for pointing that out. *sits in corner, terribly ashamed*.

A photon is a massless particle, thus it cannot carry any momentum. No momentum, no impulse, no acceleration. Photons can only be absorbed and emitted and can cause changes in the vibrational energy of atoms (which roughly translates to changes in temperature). Do us and yourself a favor and pick up a book about physical chemistry or quantum physics.

That is only true if gravity consist of particles with a mass. No particles, no temperature.

Kindly provide quotes where 'we' were swearing. Also, I do not respond well to people who look down upon others with differing sexual views. You are entitled to your opinion of course, but I am just as entitled to respond to your opinion and to question the validity of your forum signature for that matter. Furthermore, we are making attacks on your ideas, not on you, which is something else you should consider and anticipate in advance when posting on a science forum. Anyway, we are diverting away from the purpose of this topic. You still haven't provided any material or otherwise on your statement that 'they' are manufacturing any kind of nanobot.

It depends on whether or not intercellular connections can be replicated also. However, neither this nor artificial cell replication are possible at our current technology levels, and I doubt they will ever be. Limiting factors include but are not limited to energy supply and means to transfer any instruction set to the nanobots, let alone construction of said nanobots..

I am not seeing you provide an alternative either. So far, the Big Bang theory matches with our observations.

That does not answer my question. Please refrain from making ad hominem comments. This is a science forum, not a pigsty.

That was gonna be my reply to the next comment, studiot.

Suddenly there was supposed to be a big bang. We don't know any before that because to our knowledge, there was no 'before' at that moment.

You are turning things around. There can be no energy without a force component. Energy from gravity only occurs when something actually moves.

No, you actually seem to be incredibly close minded.

It is creating a force, not energy.

Who is 'they'? Citation needed.

If you want a neutral score, then come up with things that actually make sense for once

What nanobot? If the nanobot can't be made then it can't be made. And for the rest, lots of Ifs in your story.

Because physics won't let you, and it doesn't care how much you want it to.

Now be a good scientist and do the opposite experiment. Reapply the skin care product and see if the problems come back.

Also keep in mind that the reaction gases (CO2 and H2O among others) are in fact comprised of several elements. In contrary to wood however, the atom bonds in these cases are a lot more stable than those found in wood. This is actually part of the reason why wood burns.

Ash is not just carbon, but a mixture of carbon and a lot of metal elements which may or may not have been oxidized. People discovered long ago (and I am going on a tangent here) that the rain water coming down from a recently used cremation based offering table did a very good job washing clothes. Why? Simple: those metals and metal oxides form bases on contact with water, which in turn partly hydrolyze the fats coming off from whatever was burned. Tadaa, instant soap. Guess where the name potassium comes from: potASH.

The same thing that happens to a piece of meat left outside the fridge, only now on a much smaller scale.