rktpro

If heaven existed spending eternity in heaven would be very problematic because spending an eternity in heaven is almost impossible because within eternity everything possible must happen including you leaving heaven after being there X amount of time and even if you could spend eternity there. Its been proven that within eternity every possible outcome must transpire thus this means after sometime every event will occur, yet the bible speaks of a place in which you have eternal joy but it is impossible to have eternal joy because sorrow is possible so it must transpire yet don't worry joy will return, in fact it must.

No, one who attains God by devotion is given the Holy Abode by God. This is for always. Hindu scriptures say- Sada pasyanti surayah tad vishnoh parmam padam- means that one who attains the Lord is happy for always.

According to Vedas (hindu scriptures), heaven is termed as two places. 1- where you go when you have done a good deed. When the result of deed ends, you have to get back to earth and attains bodies out of 84 lakh bodies. You have no choice here. This too is granted in response to your earlier deeds.

2- The Adobe of God, where he resides is also called heaven. One who attains him by devotion remains there for always. He can wish to come to earth if he wants. He attains eternal Bliss.

Now which of the two heavens you means?

People say that God doesn't exist both scientifically and visually.

Let me conclude this:

Not everything can be visualized. Can you get the knowledge of the letter 'A' only by visualizing? Simply not. You need to have the knowledge how the word sounds.

Can you prove your father by visualizing? No, because you weren't even born at that time.

Can you prove a far country by visualizing? No, because the country can be beyond reach of eyes, but it actually exists.

Same is for God. He is beyond our material eyes and ears and all senses.

A lot of saints have seen him and they have attained bliss.

Something more-

What is nature?

Whatever we can't explain scientifically is what we call nature.

For ex- We know subatomic particles have no smell when taken individually. But when they combine in ratios of different number(as different elements) they form compounds with different smell. How can you get smell? This is termed as NATURE of electrons! Because this is unexplained.

There are countless examples of so called Nature.

GOD is what we call nature in science.

How would you SFN athiests react in response to this revelation? How would your feelings about God change? Would you love Him or hate him? Would you worship Him or would you be neutral about the situation?

 

No one is atheist! Don't everyone of us want happiness. In scriptures, it is clearly written that He is Bliss. Read carefully. He is Bliss not that he contains Bliss. I am sure all members of SFN and other people in this universe, want happiness and joy and whatever they call it- eternal peace. Also, we love all the qualities of Bliss or God like we love non-violence, truth, no theft.

You might put a question that A thief gets happiness in stealing. This means he loves the opposite of the quality of God or Bliss.

This is wrong because if you steal something precious of a thief, even he will get discomfort!

Thanks

Thanks a ton!

Black Hole, after a long time, looses the matter it had captured in form of thin gas of particles. This process by which it loose matter is known as Hawking process.

This process is very very slow and takes a lot of time!

Big Bang is a cycle. Big Bang is followed by Big Crunch and then Big Bang again.

Are all exothermic reactions combination reactions?

Also, are all endothermic reactions decomposition reactions?

I have no access to laboratory but I am curious to know the result of this experiment which I read in my elder brother's book.

EXPERIMENT

Step-1 Take about 2g ferrous sulphate crystals in a dry boiling tube.

Steo-2 Note the colour of the crystals.

Step-3 Heat the boiling tube over the flame.

I have figured the equation for this-

heat

2FeSO4.7H2O(s) ------------> Fe2O3(s) + So2(g) + SO3(g)

I need help to know

1- What is the change in colour after burning?

2- What would be the smell of the vapours?

I am wondering how fever causes rise in temperature, or fever might itself be rise in temperature.

Our body temperature rises or falls when we experience fever. But, according to first law of thermodynamics, heat must travel from hotter to colder region, balancing the temperatures.

Why doesn't this happen when we encounter fever?

It sounds good!

Maybe

Maybe similar to the "sea legs" effect of being on a boat for a long time. I think that has to do with inner-ear balance adjusting to the motion of the boat and then having to readjust to stable ground. Maybe you got "train legs." What's tragic about it?

 

 

 

Nothing tragic at all.

I have been on train for 1 day. When I finally reached my destination and came to home, I felt a little shaky. When I sit quietly and try to read a book, it seems like I am still in train and I still get shakes and jerks.

The shakes vanishes on the second day of return.

Any explanation how we get such shakes?

HI!

I am rktpro and I have done no work(F.S) since my birth!

A cheap nebuliser to pump petrol thorugh with a ignition source

Won't the flame burn the whole petrol present?

A cheap nebuliser to pump petrol thorugh with a ignition source

Won't the flame burn the whole petrol present?

Get any Nvidia graphics card with 1GB video ram. If it don't suit your pocket go for some cheap alternatives.

Read more about induction and conduction on the net. Do it yourself!

Seems impossible. Neurons once dead can't be recreated or repaired. This should be practically possible not theoretically. Like, if someone dies of heart-attack, than recreating the same atomic structure is impossible. Science is unaware of what happens to atoms when one dies.

But, if you assume it to be possible for a second, then creating matter also becomes possible.

Actually, I didn't copied. We had a presentation on biology and I learned the same definitions as given in wikipedia. When I came across your thread I remembered the same and typed it in here.

Why can't we have a practical shot here. Create a vacuum inside a bell jar and now think how something might be created. Beware you can use no other chemical or even the contents of bell jar. Only the vacuum is yours!

I agree with the nothing must create something. But this is a bit religious point of view. Nothing means nothing. This is practically impossible to create something out of this. Only a supernatural power can do it.

The electromagnet made using a rod won't help because the force is concentrated to a really small area, that is a point. If you have a magnet which has large surface area, you can probably pick the metal pieces up, the force same as in case of rod shape electromagnet.

Eat bananas buddy. They burn slowly and provide energy efficiently.

Also, not always fats are burned. They are shifted from their location until it is necessary to use them up.

Creating matter as it was in past seems to be practically impossible thing. You are telling us to make another universe. You can't neglect time even if you think the theory can be practically implemented.

Big Bang is only a conception. It has been proved by some experiments and disapproved due to others. But, all agreed to have this theory and take it as a base until they find something new(and they won't because the capturing of antimatter at CERN has verified everything).