rktpro

Inflammation is a protective attempt by the organism to remove the injurious stimuli and to initiate the healing process. Inflammation is not a synonym for infection, even in cases where inflammation is caused by infection. Although infection is caused by a microorganism, inflammation is one of the responses of the organism to the pathogen.

Without inflammation, wounds and infections would never heal. Similarly, progressive destruction of the tissue would compromise the survival of the organism. However, chronic inflammation can also lead to a host of diseases.

It is of two types- acute and chronic

Basically, in acute, movement of leukocytes from blood to infected tissue is increased. Immune system and tissues present of the spot also help.Prolonged inflammation, known as chronic inflammation, leads to a progressive shift in the type of cells present at the site of inflammation and is characterized by simultaneous destruction and healing of the tissue from the inflammatory process.

use all the equations of motion.

And is there any physical reason to assume that the universe was preceded by its absence?

Do you think it was a big ball of energy and from this energy was changed into mass?

I believe if you travelled faster than the speed of light regardless of it being possible or not, just say it was you would not time travel but light projection illusion time travel in other words if you travel faster than the speed of light you are moving faster than the projections themselves or the light itself thus they move relatively further away thus the light beams coming from another object would seem to get further & further away thus giving one the illusion that you are watching the object which produces the light beams as before it happened, yet also don't forget you would be moving faraway from this object thus if you moved back towards it, you would find you haven't time travelled at all and that the object is still in the present and so are you and so are you and the object. here is some mathematical equations to explain what I mean

 

Object = C

You = C x 2 (your travelling twice the speed of light)

 

If you look at the object, for every unit of time passed it would appear to move that further back in time, in other words if you travelled C x 2 for one second you would see the object as it was one second before the time it is, and then travel an extra second and it you get the light a second before that, and so if you travelled at C x 2 for five years, you would see the object as it was five years before you left, thus you may get to see yourself beside the object, thus get the illusion there is two you's, and in other words you would view time as going backwards, yet in truth you would just be going further into space and to places that haven't recieved the light that is of the true state of the object, so an example of this idea would be:

 

You Leave Earth for a star that is 10 light years away in 2011.

You travel to the star at C x 2 and arrive there in 2016.

If you look back at Earth, you would see the earth as it was 10 years before 2016 thus 2006.

So if you looked back at Earth you would see it as if you have travelled back in time yet it is all an illusion.

And then if you waited till 2026, you would see yourself leaving the earth and heading towards you.

 

Yet this is obviously just the light of you leaving which you have left behind, so in other words if you travel at C x 2 you lose your light property, and I guess time travel to the past isn't possible even if you travelled faster than the speed of light. Yet it is not possible to travel faster than the speed of light, but even if it was time travel to the past wouldn't be possible regardless.

Nothing can match even the speed of light and you want it to be double. It won't be an illusion. It would be time travel. Time will slow down as compared to the universe. Also, you will gain infinite mass and would require lots of energy to speed up! Mathematically, it's possible only when you break all laws of physics!

In science we ask for visual explanation of everything. But we term all those stuff we can't explain as Nature! As far as creating energy is concerned, you can only convert it from one form to another. And time do exist. You can't break the theory of relativity by just posting a thread. Space and time are inter-related. So do mass and energy!

Can you create mass?

No, you can't create something from nothing.

So, you can;t create energy.

Albert Einstein – Relativity – The Special and General Theory

I will love to read this but I have read only books written by other writers based on this book!

God created the earth and the humans. It were humans who created science. Science actually is a way of understanding what God has done for us. Understanding everything in the whole universe.

This only happens in science fictions of those Martial arts movies.

Try 'Sanskrit' and you will really enjoy it! It's difficult to learn but when you have it, you gonna love it!

I think you can't go to past. You can go to future only. A one way travel. The same program showed this type of travel! Slowing down the time!

NO atmosphere below the surface that will make them spend a lot of money for proper ventilation!

And also you can't grow fully when you have no sunlight!

Gravity is related to sharing of gravitons...why don't use time finding them!!

I think 3 times the speed of sound. For this you have to remove the windows because they might melt..

You have to trace the utilization of energy through the entire system you're concerned with. If you're using your muscles to apply force to the rock, then work is being done to contract the muscles. When the rock fails to budge, however, the energy you exert is being used to maintain muscle-contraction. If your muscles lose energy, they will stretch to their maximum length and you will no longer be exerting force against the rock. Technically, you're also compressing and shifting the rock in a way that is getting it closer to moving, although the shift is not noticeable. If you impart enough energy into the rock to move it, it will have basically acted like a spring storing up that energy until the threshold of movement was reached.

Is work done when you contract your muscles. I think NO

When we fail to move a heavy stone even after applying force, is work being done in this case? Is energy transformation taking place

Much of the evidence for dark matter comes from the study of the motions of galaxies.^[8] Many of these appear to be fairly uniform, so by the virial theorem the total kinetic energy should be half the total gravitational binding energy of the galaxies. Experimentally, however, the total kinetic energy is found to be much greater: in particular, assuming the gravitational mass is due to only the visible matter of the galaxy, stars far from the center of galaxies have much higher velocities than predicted by the virial theorem. Galactic rotation curves, which illustrate the velocity of rotation versus the distance from the galactic center, cannot be explained by only the visible matter. Assuming that the visible material makes up only a small part of the cluster is the most straightforward way of accounting for this. Galaxies show signs of being composed largely of a roughly spherically symmetric, centrally concentrated halo of dark matter with the visible matter concentrated in a disc at the center. Low surface brightness dwarf galaxies are important sources of information for studying dark matter, as they have an uncommonly low ratio of visible matter to dark matter, and have few bright stars at the center which would otherwise impair observations of the rotation curve of outlying stars.