Norman Albers

Welcome to HELL. Save your ticket stub; I signed it.

Do you know the difference between a pigeon and an investment banker? The pigeon can still put down a deposit on a BMW.

Fools do not know that they do not know what they do not know.

My apology, I had not seen Bernard Madoff's name in print, and that obviously explains the bronze piggy bank.

National Public Radio yesterday reported that in New York someone is selling a NADOLF DOLL, which is a piggy bank of his head, and the plug on the bottom doesn't work. . . . . . . . . . . . It is of cast bronze.

I call it being 'hipneck' and I certainly am, goddang flippin' betcha, sumbuck. Kirby AND HIS WIFE hiked up through my yard, and I sort of chickened out, only because when I showed him the dead tree from his land hanging toward me, he agreed I could take it out. Dang, oh well.

I am sorry all this chaos was left in. Here is hopefully a real, live joke. I have spent many hours' work thinning a green buffer zone between me and a neighbor in back. There was much dead and we have dry summer fire seasons. Then one can do levels of thinning like a good haircut, with everything growing nicely for the next few years. I made a point to go meet the folks so they would know who was thrashing around within their sight. We agreed on our forestry visions and I am mostly done. Thirty or so feet on his land is a tall dead hardwood madrone with one half leaning toward me so I mentioned it as a fire concern which I would be happy to take out, since it's my preferred firewood. He at this point was not helpful, and said only, we have done all the clearing we want to. I am feeling increasingly annoyed so I shall the next time I see him, engender the following conversation: "I do think it's good that you don't have to watch me coming out to take a leak, and also that I don't have to witness your sex acts on the kitchen table, don't you?" I think he will answer, "We do not have sex in view on the kitchen table!" I will respond, "Then that was not you, eh Kirby?"

Yah sure, depending upon your vision. It seems that what tweaks me does not tweak many of you. I shall be silent. Chrissake erase this stuff.

Most of the time. How about yourself?

I share this letter to my brother: CAPTAIN, I sent solidspin the picture of my wood fire, and he said, whoa, cool how much ***** have you scored with this!!!??? You ask, 'how much ***** have I scored?' We need to get our dimensions straight in this discussion. We have previously discussed MACHINISTS' DIMENSIONS, where pubic spirals are measured around 2-8 thousanths of an inch, from blond to black. Recently you suggested we consider quantum SPIN as being indeed short, of Planck dimension. We can feel the truth at both levels here. Energy does conform to our apparatus, no? 'WAAAAAAAAA

Good question, Primordial. Planck worked on the blackbody spectrum and published in 1901, but before then ??? What do you know? Martin I do not want to be offensive; I am expressing my frustration over trying to get to physics of quantum foam that do not produce the untenable results of our "first efforts" wherein we assume the vacuum has all possible modes in equal distribution. My brother scalbers sent me the calculator figure for Planck pressure. It is some very large number and I ask, so what??? What is? Our theory must make sense both in the small and in the large.

It seems to me everyone is being poked at. That was the brilliance of the movie "Airplane". . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . When i use blue boldface italics I am feeling badass.

Verry good question dammit. The term "conservatism' has been jacked around so badly. The good aspect is government respecting the people and the economic market. The market goes crazy, and we see there is need for further intelligence. Buddy, can you par-a-digm??? Stay tuned, folks, for further signs of intelligent life. PHI FOR ALL, WE ONLY GROW OLD ONCE, BUT WE CAN BE IMMATURE OUR WHOLE LIVES!!

The fascisti cannot handle my humor. May they dwell asymptotically in time in a thermally high energy regime. I was not making fun of Obama or anyone. This is how we talk in southwest Oregon. We are not on the same page.

I suspect this is an inconsequential result but I was surprised by how close are the values of [math]\hbar[/math] and [math] c^-4[/math].

The bounce of the universe is "inconsequential"?

I do not need your calculator. You have shown me relationships I needed to get to.

If you rule your actions by immediate response you will not act. I get very little response from most of my posts. I do not offer them because my ego demands magnification. I do so because after long months of work I see things I did not previously see. Now Google on 'Kerr electron' and witness I am at top of the page along with A. Burinskii. He has worked here more than forty years. I hope to catch up with him.

Cool, Martin, I shall enjoy this discussion in another locale. Carry on, please. You are giving me important tools of vision. Others will certainly appreciate this.

In the angular momentum Kerr metric field, a dimensionless ratio comes out: m/a where the two are as defined in General Relativity construction, as geometric mass and geometric angular momentum (density...) It seems to come out around E-44 and can be written as: [math] \frac {GM^2}{ Jc} [/math] for the electron. Note that it contains spin and not charge. The Reissner-Nordstrom metric becomes significant down around E-23 meters, IIRC. OK Martin the thing I need to ask you here is what of electron Schwarzschild radii of E-57? Is this beyond the pale of what may be described??? Normally I wouldn't care to be honest! Now, though, this ring singularity at E-13 meters is supposedly that thin and I suspend judgements... Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedAny other mass-energy states are not so far from the half-MEV of the electron (5-6 orders ?) that they, too, have a ring singularity of smaller radius, as [math]a_{GR} =J/Mc[/math]. The reason I say normally I would not Kerr <> about the Schwarzschild radius is that I figure things really do fall apart into quantum foam in the Planck regime. I trust that the essence that I portray in my inhomogeneous electron study is indeed fulfilled at that level at least. Merged post follows: Consecutive posts mergedI don't mean to muck up your presentation with needless ratios, but there are several length dimensions produced in GR and these are what concern me.

I hear you and thank you, Martin. I pull up this stuff in my quantum GR studies.

Troon just sent me a reject New Yorker cartoon: Two cave men meet, one saying "I am a hunter". Answers the other, "I am a gatherer". Behind a rock a large lizard holding three carrots says, "I am screwed".

On one hand, maybe it's classical, but on the other hand there is nothing classical about a fluctuation field of inhomogeneity.

If electrons are point-like, how can this yield finite energy? If you integrate the energy contained in the electric field alone, from a far distance into the classical radius, you get half an MEV. The field cannot contain a higher and higher energy density going to smaller radii, it seems to me! This is why I built a model where a near-field of polarization response balances the excess with negative energy. This leads me to the vision of electrons as singular arrangements of electric dipoles.

You may remember my neighbor, Troon, from last year: One of Albert Einstein's Little Known Theories Albert Einstein's birthday was March 14. He would now be 127. Few people remember that the Nobel Prize winner married his cousin, Elsa Lowenthal, after his first marriage dissolved in 1919. He stated that he was attracted to Elsa because she was well endowed. He postulated that if you are attracted to women with large breasts, the attraction is stronger if there is a DNA connection. This came to be known as Einstein's Theory of Relative Titty. Oh, be quiet. I didn't write this, I just forwarded