Dhillon1724X

I will ask for sure. I am bit less active but i read everything in my interest. Now i am working on some projects and have a small team. I find exploring new things fun. There's a famous line "Death and Love will find you when its time." I am doing many things too but i am not master in those things. I learn alot from all of you guys, I will miss you all someday. I took @studiot words in my mind and now i sleep at time in exams.

The anti-time, i wonder how will it act when somehow it comes in contact with time,but its too theoretical and imaginary. Time flows, so can this anti time be opposite. if there's anti time then there must be anti-space too as Spacetime=Space+Time. So this can be a whole another dimension. Our space is expanding,so can this anti-space contracting.

I was thinking that, Mars might have some different types of microorganisms and bacteria. It have different environment too, so we will get unique diseases too?

I dont care until you are handling everything. I will treat your work as same as any other. A important thing to note is that AI can shorten your work and can skip some sections. If you give it multiple sections at once or a file and say make it this or that,It will choose most efficient way(Shortening). You have to give it proper prompt,but i will not recommend to generate with AI's help. You should use LaTex,You can take AI's help to generate proper code.

It looks like you did copy/paste. I am used to AI. Its format AI uses. You asked AI question and then just copy pasted it. AI will try to prove whatever you say. You can use it as Assistant but you need Physics knowledge first. ¨You cant go to treasure hunt without map¨

Well you are right but they help us to get right entertainment.

I will critique later, But you have put some hardwork in it. It's a speculative meta-theory — something that hopes to explain physics, but hasn’t yet reproduced it. To support a speculation you need evidences and proper mathematics.

+1 The Moderators do hardwork for us,To make our experience better and they help us. Without them this forum will fall apart. They deserve respect.

Sorry for that. I will not try to defend my words. If i stated something wrong then thats my mistake. Currently i dont think i have anything to share about QCF as i am working on something,in sometime i will share it(I am working QCF). I think i have answered to all critiques and question.

Yes,they are not part but i have access to Internet.I keep gathering knowledge.

I stated ¨ I will be happy to help simulate or evaluate it using open source tools¨. I would have tried different ways and gathered info to help him as much as i can.

Did i claim to know? Its a computer program used for modeling or something. I will try not to continue arguing with a elder on personal issues. Thanks for your perspective. atomic scale modeling.

I’m open to learning, which is exactly why I participate and share. But learning doesn't mean silence or deference — it means thinking critically and testing ideas, even if they’re new or challenging. If sharing a fresh approach looks like 'hubris', maybe the field could use more of it.

I use it like a translator or tool like grammarly. I gathered all info on my own. Its not about downvote,its about underestimating me and setting limits . I got another DW,hahahaha

No problem,i am also new to this subject. I got downvotes because i am 15 and they think i cant write this. They said i am decieving new member by pretending as a expert(It makes no sense) I didnt claim to be expert,I admitted that i used AI to use correct terminology but i first learnt about it,. I gathered info to help that guy.

Sorry for asking too much. When i talk with someone old,i want to know if he/she is happy.

To test the feasibility in DFT or simulate its phonon/electronic properties, could you share the crystal structure? Ideally a CIF or POSCAR file, or even rough lattice parameters and atomic positions. Without the structure, we can't simulate stability, band structure, or phonons — which are needed to evaluate superconductivity claims. it's definitely intriguing. I understand that synthesizing and testing new superconducting materials can be expensive and out of reach without funding, but there are scientific ways we can still explore and validate your concept. If you can provide the crystal structure (even a rough sketch, ideally with space group, atomic positions, and elemental composition), we can use first-principles simulations (like DFT + phonon and electron-phonon coupling analysis) to: Check the stability of the structure (thermodynamic + vibrational) Calculate the electronic structure and band properties Predict the electron–phonon coupling strength Estimate the superconducting critical temperature (Tc) using models like McMillan or full Eliashberg theory These simulations are widely accepted in theoretical physics and material science communities. Some even use machine-learning predictors trained on thousands of known superconductors to estimate Tc directly from structure. So — if you’re open to it — feel free to send me: The structure file (CIF, POSCAR, or any readable format) The exact chemical formula Any assumptions or expectations you have for the superconducting behavior I’ll be happy to help simulate or evaluate it using open-source tools. That way, you might be able to publish preliminary theoretical results or gain support for funding from institutions or journals. Looking forward to hearing more!

You are right, I am not saying that in way you are thinking. Its more like Sarcasm or a joke.

It cant take your place to be precise.

I recently got downvotes for knowing too much.

Thanks for the reminder. I never intended to mislead anyone — I simply wrote a thing grounded in the standard methods used to test superconductivity claims, like DFT and phonon analysis. I’m still a student and learning, but I’m serious about science. If anything I said was technically incorrect, I welcome correction. But dismissing valid ideas based on who says them instead of what’s being said defeats the purpose of scientific discussion. @Radhakrishnan J Can you answer the questions and explain a bit more. You cant share a link or file of your work here.

“At what point did I claim to be an expert? Please quote me if I did. If the fact that someone younger can speak in technical terms bothers you, maybe the issue isn't deceit — it’s your ego. Pointing out my age doesn’t disprove what I said. If you think the technical content is wrong, let’s discuss that. Otherwise, assuming bad faith because I’m a student is just gatekeeping @Sohan Lalwani I am getting downvotes too.But due to very unique reason😂

i used we to reffer both me and Radhakrishnan J I used that worst thing called AI to overcome any problem in communication. But i learn then write and post. I atleast know what crystal structure,phonons,DFT is at very basic levels. @exchemist I tagged you as i thought you might be able to handle things better then me. Should i stop and say ¨Ah!I cant learn this as i am not old enough.My brain is limited¨

I gathered info about what we need in this type of things,i dont know in full details. I used various sources like google. If you are judging by age then that QCF isnt mine too. Its just surface level thing. Its your choice to downvote,but i didnt claim to know everything. If i need these things and i have interest then i can learn these too.

no,he will see it here when he comes online. He is nice guy,To be everyone here is a nice guy.