MJ kihara

Looking for away to make my thinking clearer...but I think the idea has been around. You can't try to have different results such as if causality violation is possible using the same argument that has been there for more than a century expecting different results. Some things needs modifications and readjustments.....and of course redefinition. Yes more a kin to basic framework...'pop' come first before formalization. In a nutshell what are physical things? U can't hold it..you are it, you are in it. Just for the purpose of analogy...if you dive into the ocean you find your friend the Fish...then you borrow it a cup of water where will it hold to give it to you...in these case an ocean without a floor...?

No. It's a fluidlike fabric...one large fabric called the universe...analogy in these case will be just like water molecules are to the ocean..spacetime particles,loops, bubbles( virtual particles) are to the universe.

Its right. Space-time turning it into a thing on it's own right to become spacetime fabric.therefore..using space-time to explain/describe a thing called spacetime fabric... so that we can have a common point to merge GR and QM. Inevitable... unavoidable...you can't avoid that which has happened...others are assumptions. According to my thinking space-time emerged from spacetime fabric.

Spacetime fabric it's on the canvas fabric,it's on the cotton fibre,it's in the cotton fibre,it's on elements making up the cotton fibre,it's in the atoms,in their electrons in their proton and neutron,in their quarks... etc etc It's the fabric that make you and me and the universe we know of...it's constituent being closed loops of space and time. When we interprate it mathematically using geometry we get spacetime. 🤯..loop..encircling that's the idea... bubbles...😇

When the neutrinos are passing through the Earth,through our bodies, through our brains as we are thinking...they are just moving through the spacetime fabric.we are physical from our perspective...but I think from neutrinos perspective we're just spacetime fabric....being physical is just qualities of spacetime fabric. Since it has already happened it's an inevitable.

The problem is us separating ourselves from the universe...we are not different entities...we are part of the universe...the particles that make us are part of the universe....we are also spacetime fabric. And of course maybe not a major part of it...but an inevitable part of it because we exist.

Using the current models going FTL is impossible cause u keep pumping in alot of energy while warping spacetime until u get your self collapsed into a blackhole to realise you going nowhere.. wormhole and warp drive enormous energy til you wonder where to stand in the space as u make it. We need a model where energy issues are minimised and or reinterprate lorentz factor so that we redifine energy...to take into consideration of square root of a negative.

Pliz sentient is not consciousness...it's just part of consciousness. If u sent a rocket past a planet inhibited by natives whose scientific knowledge is limited and they realize the rocket is manouevrable in unpredictable manner...they will interprate it to be a conscious object....therefore consciousness is not all about feeling pain...it's about responding and making decisions. In this case the rocket will be following instructions put in it in whatever form or following commands from back here on Earth. Traveling back in time is impossible for an evolving universe..it's not(universe) stuck in time. If u move FTL 'if possible' u simply arrive a head of light....it's like two ancient warring communities one uses a donkey and the other uses a horse to sent message...the one using a horse which is faster will have an upper hand in manipulating situation..but as the message is being sent the situation in the battle field will still be evolving. The issue of backwards in time,I think comes from the idea of looking up in space and seeing the way the universe used to be earlier because light doesn't move instantaneously it take time to arrive...however where it came from is still elvoving...if we happen to move there(source of light) instantly,we will not have moved back in time,we will just get it as it is...it's present form as it's evolving...let say it was a star as we look at the telescope several billion years ago...then it happened to collapse to a blackhole that later evaporated through emission of Hawking radiation...all this as the universe is evolving then we move there instantly we will just get a spacetime fabric without a star.if the universe is elvoving uniformly (at the same rate across) then we come back home we will get things going on as usual with the time difference being equivalent with the time spend out there.

It's not about supporting statements..it's about you asking questions intending at directing discussions in a manner that if you don't comphrend you lock someone down.

Where are you from...from nowhere to everywhere..😂 just look at my other thread.

We are talking about FTL it could be better if the owner of this thread directs the discussion....esp when dealing with controversial questions..and esp with someone with powers to shut you up and lock you down in a blackhole cause he can't comprehend your explanations and thinking.

Why then bother bringing us into the existence... finding ourselves asking this question. If it doesn't, it teaches us by observing it.if a supernova happens in our neighborhood star....we know what gamma ray's will do to us.it has kept record for us,what happened to the dinosaur. We know that given enough resources human can reproduce a lot to go and occupy those places..given that we are on top of animal intelligence it's incumbent upon us to figure out...how to do it(FTL).

My thinking is it's possible and not just possible even further than it..i.e faster and further than speed of light...without violating SR and GR...the limit has been put by the already developed conventional models. I don't think we were meant for a brief existence in this solar system.

Photon is at the transition point.... .where quantum emerge from.... as matter acquire structure within the the interlocked cloud like layer stable virtual particles while the unstable virtual particles decay/disintergrate falling back to their level of stability or further back to the source(emptiness-consciouness boundary).therefore an equilibrium situation develops...when stable virtual particles passes this level they go to the next level...the whole process repeats as different levels are formed that correspond to different particles. At photon zone as indicated in the prior structure the majority of stable virtual particles are emitted at rate of 6x10^34 particles per second...when the photon is moving in spacetime fabric these virtual particles are emitted to become part of spacetime fabric and since their surface dimension is similar to photons they form a kind of spacetime fabric superfluid. However as they are emitted to spacetime fabric the cloudlike layer interlock tighten as vibration within it reduces....as more virtual particles are formed below the layer, vibration within the cloudlike layer increases and then the interlock loosen releasing another bunch of virtual particles this oscillation is the origin of amplitue, wavelength and of course frequency of light. Dark photon virtual particle emission frequency is below this threshold..majority of virtual particle disintergrate upon release from the surface,therefore, its surface dimension is dorminated by disintergrating virtual particles. Therefore,there is shift in equilibrium of what is dorminating the surface of particles as the transition takes place from Primordial quantization to quantum formation, the initial point being the formation of photon and it's properties.

Let me not beat the bushes,to me this diagram is excellent...maybe it's just on my head...I had to read Qm,BB,GR for several years for me to come up with this ...bt time will tell if such ideas will help someone somewhere to come up with... ideas that will help the rest of us.....if a mad person goes to the doctor....the doctor will try to diagonise symptom and try to understand the spectrum of mental illness....what about if the doctor just shout to the patient you have a demon in you!...where could progress come from in the society. In this model photon emits inverse planck's number of stable virtual particles per second that is the beginning of quantization....below this threshold it become dark photon. Virtual particles get highly entangled with it's source therefore virtual particle emitted from photon are highly entangled to it. Virtual particles emitted from particles with crests and troughs get entangled to those crest and trough to form charge....the arrows... Virtual particles dimension is similar to photons surface dimension....therefore they both move at the speed of light in spacetime fabric. Virtual particles entanglement near their source creates constraints... reducing their degree of freedom as they move up the hierarchy...this constraint give rise to Higgs field. Oscillation between highest degree of freedom and lowest degree of freedom give rise to wave nature of Higgs field. In Sea quark there are infinite oscillations in their Higgs field degree of freedom in this case I will call them vibration but collapses to three crests and three troughs that give rise to valency down quark Gravitation influence take place at virtual particle level....this involves entanglement of of virtual particles...in this case entanglement involves exchange of information....this explain why gravity is the weakest force(takes place at virtual particles level)...and it's involved both in dark matter and normal because both emit vitual particles....the constant rate of information exchange between virtual particle is given by Newton gravitational constant G.... Mass and gravity are United at Higgs fields when this fields become saturated emitting temporary graviton that decays at to less than planck's time to gravitation waves... Gravitation waves become the template of spacetime curvature...when it interact with other virtual particles making spacetime fabric....

i will make further explanations regarding those diagrams...as the discussion proceeds.

those surface forms from properties of virtual particles which include they can either be stable,partially stable or unstable, therefore,they develop levels of instability as they are emitted and move in spacetime fabric.therefore,surface of elementary particles consist of interlocked cloud like layer containing virtual particles transitioning within their levels of instabilities. pliz joigus i will account for them,no superstition here you should clarify to me what is superstition... as the discussion proceed its not like am drawing while thinking,while writing. the model has been developed, in one way or the other to account for that.for example if you bring those quarks in close proximity, as happened during quark epoch in Big bang, those protruding crests interacted to form gluons,i will do combination later,when they stretch they form gluon flux tubes and when they tear they form gluon balls. i wish initially i could have gone step by step to bring coherence to what am doing. ....structure of neutrino and z boson the outside pointing arrow represent virtual particles emitted from crest while inside pointing arrow represent virtual particles emitted from troughs w boson structure....

.....jet of particles after tearing of Higgs fields(mass) after an equal amount of energy has been applied during particles collision...this is possible as shown in the elementary structure below... in this case as shown in the diagram above particles gain mass when Higgs field interact with spacetime fabric,,the diagram is a 2D representation of otherwise what is spherical bubble like structure,the Higgs fields emanate from photon surface as virtual particle are emitted. at neutrino surface the fields are weakly forming thus forming "primordial Higgs fields",hence the small mass of neutrino. As shown in the structure this fields protrude from the surface of of elementary particles interacting with spacetime fabric therefore it generates mass by dragging it generating resistance to movement that appear as mass. The protrusion is minimum at neutrino and increases up the hierarchy up to Higg boson. How those boundary,levels,surface develops is shown as illustrated in the following diagram

From the experiments of particle colliders..a jet of particles are released as energy is transformed to mass... according to model represented by the diagram there is redefinition of energy and mass so that....the particles are always there and energy has to cause tearing for the particles to be released in a manner consistent with Energy being equal to mass multiplied by speed of light squared(Einstein's formular) Energy is continuously produced at emptiness consciouness boundary...which is detected as dark energy powering continued expansion of the universe as it elvoves.

Matter why is it there is more matter than anti matter in the current universe?.. Radiation why does a single photon interfere with itself when made to pass through double slit?.. Space where did it come from? Time what causes twin paradox and why? Does a straw man allowed to come with hypothesis...esp one that appear to address the previously asked questions?

When there is no data to support either,is there one of it that is more correct than the other? When you start speculating do you start from the unknown to the known? Or from the known to the unknown? Because in this case have tried either. Where did energy come from? Am asking this because that was my starting point of speculation.

Can you consider hypothesis as speculation?

Where did matter and radiation come from?

It's concluded its false based on already what is established as the truth...then what was in Bing bang hot and dense point? During the inflation phase of big bang what was causing the inflation? If the metrics of spacetime was changing,where the metrics of spacetime come from? What is you believe in this, who and what caused big bang?(on the issue of uncomfortable) I suggest those are the points that made me land on speculations. Why then can't i go on speculating,then when am done examine the results of speculation. If thinking is wrong,in this case thinking wrongly or correctly,what about dreaming.

Am not insisting that am correct only that am stuck far away from the points that will show how correct my arguments are...for instance about the virtual particles....I haven't moved even to a point of saying how useful is this....the reason am not changing some of the statements like consciousness was concentrated at that point in the beginning is that .....they will support my arguments up the diagram....I understand it might be a shaky foundation...if it's not strong enough it will come down crumbling...I wish I was given that chance...to continue up the diagram.the next thread and that thing in the trash can all are related but they won't make a meaning on their own. That diagram is not refuting big bang it's just trying to show what might have been at that particular time of hot and dense point...saying that it is patently false, then what is the truth?