Genady

32 minutes ago, TheVat said:

no tricks

Not for you, but for me

2 hours ago, TheVat said:

So you are twins

Just looked up the definition:

2 hours ago, TheVat said:

same date of birth

Does it mean day / month / year?

1 hour ago, TheVat said:

A woman goes to a company to fill out a job application.  As the secretary looks it over, she says, oh we had someone apply yesterday with the same last name, same parents, and same date of birth.  

That's my sister, said the woman.

So you are twins, said the secretary.

No, we are not, said the woman.

 

Explain.

19 minutes ago, TheVat said:

A woman goes to a company to fill out a job application.  As the secretary looks it over, she says, oh we had someone apply yesterday with the same last name, same parents, and same date of birth.  

That's my sister, said the woman.

So you are twins, said the secretary.

No, we are not, said the woman.

 

Explain.

19 minutes ago, KJW said:

I think the image of Nikola Tesla on the first video should be considered a big red flag as far as pseudoscience is concerned.

 

 

This is my experience as well.

The answer is here:

16 minutes ago, exchemist said:

the look of what is on that plate

is horrible.

Similar effect allows bacteria to withstand much higher osmotic pressures than eukaryotic cells. In this case, it is the line-square rather than the square-cube law. When you decrease the size by a factor, the ability of a membrane to withstand tear decreases by that factor while the tearing force decreases by the factor squared. Thus, a bacterium that is 100 times smaller than a regular cell can withstand 100 times higher osmotic pressure.

2 minutes ago, geordief said:

Can we bottle (or just create) spacetime curvature and thereby  create (or annihilate) mass?

That might  be a causal relationship. 

Spacetime curvature is associated with radiation. The latter does not have mass.

3 minutes ago, exchemist said:

the concept of zero point energy implies there is a sort of ineradicable residual motion in the ground states of bound systems

Is it a motion?

1 minute ago, knowledgeispower917 said:

ok from my understanding, it is the belief that everything is made of vibrating energy including thoughts and people and like energy attracts like energy so positive thoughts attract positive experiences and negative thoughts attract negative experiences. 

None of this *** has anything to do with quantum theory or the science of physics.

Just now, DanMP said:

Indeed. Sorry.

Well, then the question about the field changes to: what are the fields and how they were created?

What they are is described by specific QFT theories. Generally, field is an entity that pervades space and time and is defined by its properties such as spin.

"How they were created" goes back to the dawn of the universe.

3 minutes ago, DanMP said:

the electromagnetic field was successfully "discarded"

It was not. It is rather the other way around. Photons are quantum excitations of EM field. The QED and other QFT theories describe interactions of fields. (QFT = Quantum Field Theory.)

Same here.

1 hour ago, DanMP said:

I would ask.

Does the QFT provide a sufficient answer?

1 hour ago, Moontanman said:

how a charge creates an electrical field

It does not. Not in QED, the best current theory.

2 hours ago, Rian00077 said:

they are described by more than one real number

How many?

1 hour ago, tylers100 said:

But the questions I brought up, are specific to see if making an object to behave differently under a condition. (e.g. trying to apply a concept or approach that is different from ordinary or convenient approach).

How your questions are different from ordinary or conventional approach to behavior of objects under gravity?

8 hours ago, Rian00077 said:

10 pages ... figures and formulas

Make it short. Embed figures. Use LaTeX for formulas.

3 hours ago, tylers100 said:

I have some questions that I'm curious about before moving on:

Q: If making objects with less dense mass property alongside with perhaps a change in direction, would these be able to lift or float up (e.g. artificial anti-gravity)?

Q: If making objects with greater dense mass property alongside with a change or more concentrated direction, would these able to ground astronauts on a floor in spacecraft or space station (e.g. artificial gravity)?

The law of gravity is known. Try to answer your questions by applying it.

From the "Guidelines":

... members should be able to participate in the discussion without clicking any links ...

... Attached documents should be for support material only; material for discussion must be posted. ...

... Keep alternative science and your own personal conjecture to the appropriate forum (Speculations). ...

See Guidelines - Science Forums.

17 minutes ago, Airbrush said:

more than one infinite universe could co-exist in a natural way

As I have mentioned, there are many ways. One of them is that the multiverse's space is not necessarily three dimensional.

17 minutes ago, Airbrush said:

How can a finite universe not have a center or edges?

If its geometry is not Euclidean, for example.

3 minutes ago, npts2020 said:

Why should this be true? What makes the visible universe spherical is that the limits on the speed of light are the same in every direction, AFAIK there is no spherical symmetry to the mass in the visible universe, what would make it symmetrical outside of it? 

On the scale of several hundred megaparsec and more the visible universe is homogeneous and isotropic. It means that on that scale it is the same in all directions.

10 hours ago, npts2020 said:

once we figure out a reliable way of measuring gravitational effects from bodies outside our visible universe on bodies inside our visible universe

As the bodies outside our visible universe make pretty much spherically symmetric shell, their gravitational effect inside the shell is identically zero.