Bufofrog
-
Posts
1859 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bufofrog
-
-
What are some questions you ponder?
Why would someone ask such an unspecific open ended question?
0 -
37 minutes ago, Country Boy said:
Okay, since your are talking about DC current where do "electromagnetic waves" come into it? Electromagnetic waves do not travel along wires.
I am not very well versed in electronics so I may have gotten my terminology wrong.
This is from wiki: In everyday electrical and electronic devices, the signals travel as electromagnetic waves typically at 50%–99% of the speed of light, while the electrons themselves move much more slowly.
My point to the OP was the signal in the circuit travels very fast but the drift speed of the electrons in the conductor is slow.
0 -
Your sources state that the map show the population that have the haplogroup Q is the indigenous Americans NOT the general population as you stated.
From your Wiki source:
Q-M242 is the predominant Y-DNA haplogroup among Native Americans and several peoples of Central Asia and Northern Siberia.
1 -
14 hours ago, mathematic said:
Most households use AC where the electrons jiggle in place.
Agreed, I was using a DC example so the electrons would move in the direction of the current.
0 -
11 minutes ago, altaylar2000 said:
This is map of distribution of the haplogroup Q all over the world not America
You are saying 'almost all' Americans are descended from Asians and not Europeans based on your supplied map. I am simply asking for the source for that map. As I said I think you are misreading the source and I would like verify what the source says. Thanks.
0 -
1 hour ago, Non-AcademicMadeADiscovery said:
It has two lists of people. All the people in the first list share an epigenetic profile.
I have a few questions. What is the epigenetic profile they share?
1 hour ago, Non-AcademicMadeADiscovery said:They also share a physical feature.
What is that physical feature?
1 hour ago, Non-AcademicMadeADiscovery said:All the people in the second list also share an epigenetic profile and a physical feature.
What is their common profile and physical feature?
1 -
1 hour ago, fredreload said:
From what I can there are perhaps 3 ways.
1. Using optogenetic laser to grab the molecule into the correct position and solder the bonds with laser.
2. Using nanomachine to assemble the molecules.
3. Using enough energy next to the atom to create a length contract to teleport the atom into the correct position thereby assembling it with the other atoms.
P.S. For your starship I suggest a constant velocity boost in vacuum, an example would be the starship in asteroid where it just keeps accelerating until it hits something. But the vertical force might be too great that it pulls the ship apart.
All these ideas are useless. If it impossible for idea to be physically accomplished, then it is little more than fantasy.
0 -
5 minutes ago, fluctusequitantes said:
Thank you for your comment, Im not 100% happy with the hypothesis, As the assumptions I have made a just that, however with more information from knowledgeable can expand on the problem's..
Afew examples beings, How the universe cooled so quickly after the initial event. Why the universe is expanding, because it's spreading out. The flatness problem, Distant regions of space in opposite directions of the sky are so far apart that, assuming standard Big Bang expansion, they could never have been in causal contact with each other.
The structure problem, It Doesn't disregard the first law of thermodynamics.
Apparently you have some hypothesis. Would you care to share it so it could be discussed?
0 -
In general when someone says, here is the truth about race, whatever follows is not truth. Just like when someone says, I'm not racist - but..., whatever follows is racist.
2 -
6 hours ago, altaylar2000 said:
It was generally accepted that modern americans(not only US) in general descendants of Europeans, but dna-genealogy says that almost all of them are from Asia, from region of Altay.
Please supply a source for this claim. I suspect that the genetics you are citing are about the indigenous people's of the Americas and not the European colonizers.
0 -
6 hours ago, altaylar2000 said:
We have been taught that current is the movement of particles. But that doesn't match what it is traveling at the speed of light.
The electrons in current carrying conductor do not move very fast but the electromagnetic waves in the conducter move at the speed of light through the conductor. So a light may turn on almost instantly when switched on but the electrons from the source will take a while to reach the light.
0 -
If you want discuss your idea then you need to present it here. That is kinda a rule...
0 -
5 hours ago, fredreload said:
The problem is I have not thought of a way to move atoms around and create bonds
Yeah that's always the problem.
I've got an idea where we can build a starship that can move at 90% the speed of light to travel to other stars, the problem is I have not thought of a way to produce the energy and convert it to thrust...
1 -
I see from your graphic that you are showing that the gas giant planets are in fact larger than the earth, so that is good.
Was your OP actually trying to say the earth is the largest solid body in the solar system?
0 -
11 minutes ago, AlexandrKushnirtshuk said:
I suppose, it is because the Earth is the largest object in the Universe,
The earth is not the largest object in the universe. There are 5 objects larger than the earth in our own solar system.
0 -
18 minutes ago, Cain Wilson said:
So, I’m assuming a mechanism that would hold (yes liquid, not vapor) water like a bubble around the earth.
That presents a major problem. If you assume something that defies physics then any conclusions based on that false assumption is meaningless.
OTOH, clouds are liquid water, they are made of tiny water droplets, so we could discuss that approach. A bubble of liquid water around the earth is about as likely as a shell of rock in the atmosphere.
0 -
It sounds like you are asking about a scenario where there are 20 meters of liquid water suspended in the atmosphere. Since that would make no sense, I assume I am misreading what you are saying, could you rephrase your question?
0 -
9 hours ago, Non-AcademicMadeADiscovery said:
To answer your question, to do a presentation on just one profile and its causes would take almost just as long.
Hopefully you now understand you don't need a presentation. All you need to do is present one piece of supporting evidence, just one piece. It should take one paragraph of less. That should kick off a discussion, which is kind of the point of this forum.
1 -
24 minutes ago, Matt1194 said:
The logical answer to me is yes I’d still be the same person, but ever so slightly different. But at what point of changing my brain before it was made would a different consciousness have been born. Or was my consciousness always going to exist no matter what brain was made in the womb?
I don't know what you mean by the same person. I think the same person just means a continuum of memories. You are clearly different than you were when you were 7 years old, essentially a different person, it just seems like you weren't that different because of your continuum of memories.
0 -
3 hours ago, awaterpon said:
Why not you use your scale and try it yourself?
I already know the answer, I don't need to prove to myself that rest mass is rest mass.
0 -
56 minutes ago, awaterpon said:
The alternative weight is the force by gravity on a human which opposes human lifting himself
No, that is normal weight.
58 minutes ago, awaterpon said:Alternative mass is the mass with inertia that opposes body moving himself
No, that also is normal weight.
59 minutes ago, awaterpon said:Unfortunately I live in a poor country ,these scales are rear only in clinics and hospitals ,and in the market it is too expensive for me to buy
Sorry to hear that.
0 -
17 hours ago, Non-AcademicMadeADiscovery said:
Yes, but the presentation would take me at least five months (of doing nothing else but working on it) to put together.
How about any evidence on one of the 27? I mean clearly for you to proclaim you have made this discovery you have some level of evidence at the ready.
0 -
31 minutes ago, Mender said:
Sounds quite risky
Did you hear the sonic boom yesterday about 3 pm ? We live in Somerset too and we heard a boom ... apparently caused by a meteorite going over above jersey?
Why do you keep hijacking your own thread? If you are done with the flood stuff, then start a new thread for your other questions or thoughts.
0 -
1 hour ago, Mender said:
Getting back to the deluge idea ... if a meteorite strikes the sea we would have a tsunami over a large part of the earth and rain over the rest
That would indeed cause a large tsunami.
1 hour ago, Mender said:if another struck the land as well you would have a dust cloud that might make the rain keep going for weeks as no sunlight would dry out the clouds and create a greenhouse effect that would cause moisture and evaporation... more rain et al?
A large meteorite striking land would cause cooling not heating of the earth.
16 minutes ago, Mender said:Is it possible that some of the inland water across the globe are the results of meteorites striking at an angle creating my previous posts conditions and then being filled in with water in due course?
Inland water is due to rain.
The flood myth is based on fears of the catastrophic effects of large floods and ancient people inability to understand how or why they happen. You bring up a good point about tsunamis, they would be particularly terrifying and unexplainable.
0
Will humanity come back to cannibalism?
in Ethics
Posted
I don't think this is a modern belief, its been around for quite a while. Do you think if someone hits a chicken with there car they should be prosecuted for vehicular homicide?