scherado

The Monkees, 1st album

Any shenanigans during any election is bad for any polity. No? Yes.

I won't be permitted to reply--an assent, FYI--to the resultant warning. As you were...(you all)

From your answer, one might infer that the duration remains the same? Am I correct? Earth's rotation; Earth's revolution. Will someone name another two?

I don't understand this. Can you explain how the "definition" of "one second" is being changed? Please keep in mind that it is a duration.

I can't help but wonder how Mann would answer that question.

That might be called a probable definition. On what basis would one define the bounds of the universe using the word "probable?" Hey, that just might be called a "quantum conundrum"!!!!!!

....and not empty?

Well, I was going to address the German original of the English translation that has become the basis of this dispute. I searched for other translations but found the following before I found what I sought: The most interesting and penetrating diagnosis of this condition I have ever encountered I do believe that this precedes my first writings on the subject, but I will need to research myself to make that determination. Perhaps, you will find this man's treatment of the subject writing...persuasive. Let me know. Thanks.

I'm not following this subject, but I did listen to this portion of the John Batchelor show on the subject of the Catalonia referendum:

There's going to be a short honeymoon, apparently.

Yes, this is what I mean and it appears that you follow.

Let me make one thing clear. If you are going to convince me to discuss actual, factual data on the subject, then I won't be responding to "it appears to be from". Do you follow?

Does this reply mean that you won't provide a link?

Presumably, for Theresa May. I wonder which of the politicians in Britain know how many acid attacks have been committed in London since, well, since the first one.

How are you going to understand how Nietzsche saw Kant, "cursory" or otherwise? Do you understand the question?

Are you aware--I'm not asking with sincerity--that your post has no link to the source of your graphs? Perhaps, it was taken from Wiki-pee-D-uh. Perhaps, not. Please provide the link, a link, any link, after which I will address the input from your Memory Division. Thanks. Am I the only one who's wondering whether "Patti_the_Scientist" has an opinion?

For Your Pleasure, Roxy Music, 1973

I will inform you that when I sought to tackle Nietzsche, I abjured all second-party interpretation, I refused to read any other person's interpretation of the originals. This, I did. The reasons we can discuss.

It is not an exhaustive rebuttal. What it is, is a damned good rebuttal, The court case between Mann and Steyn is most illustrative (9.8 on Euphemism Meter.)

Have a nice day.

Welcome as today's first person to be added to my ignore list. Congratulations. Good luck with your new user name if you chose that option. Las Vegas investigation focuses on Paddock's finances and travel

On 1: I don't understand those two sentences. On 2: I don't understand those two sentences On 3: I do understand that sentence and find it preposterous beyond words. I consider that judgement prima faci (self-evident.)