fredreload

Hmm, there is this video I saw comparing CPU and GPU rendering on a 3D structure in Korean, I think it was a brain structure where the user could switch from GPU rendering to CPU rendering which was programmed in c# visual studio somewhere in this forum and I think GPU is much faster. I know I've read the GFLOP generated by each but I don't think they account for the big picture. I'll have to do some digging around to find that post. My bad I might have gotten an answer before = =

Ya, these things are overrated, it doesn't feel like my consciousness would go anywhere except that one time. Most of the time it just produce headache and brain damage. But you can't get to the consciousness without entering the head first lol P.S Slap the money

Na, no one has complained to me about being too harsh, if it's something I need to learn myself then it is the right answer P.S Unless you have an answer @@

Ya, I've heard of the strongest MRI machine with 11.7 tesla magnetic strength. You'll need neutron star to power this one.

You're right, I guess it's back to square one. Probably a really strong electric field or magnetic field. So you propose that it is not possible to get a nano scale resolution of the brain in vivo?

Yes I know, that's why I am trying to find a way to have the electron pass through the sample(tissue) in which I compared it to light(photon) at high frequency becomes x-ray which pass through the tissue. Thereby increasing the frequency of electron as an alternating current of high frequency to pass through the skin, lock on the brain's neurons and synapses and generate an image. Sounds ridiculous I know, this is based on my speculation. P.S Alternating current of high frequency does go through tissue, like the Tesla coil

Oh ya? How does this guy gets it to work then = =. Difference between two high frequency alternating current to generate atomic resolution microscopy. https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.1149922

Ya, it's my fault, as you've clearly stated what I should be doing. Well, doesn't hurt to give someone an "answer" if you already "know" "who is faster" in a comparison between "CPU" and "GPU" running the "tensorflow" :D. Just because I can bake toast does not mean I need to build a toast machine = =. Just because I am an American does not mean I have to relive the May Flower incident. And I would then work on it if "there is no available answer". But well, I know people with a hands on attitude on things and I respect that. You and Strange should chill. If you have an absolute reason of why I must work on it before obtaining an answer let me know, people complained to me about this before, but I could not see the reason D:. Doesn't mean I am correct, I am open to suggestions as you clearly know the question I am asking. Well for the previous questions that I made on this forum is mostly hypotehtical. I have limited resources and budgets to spend on things D:, just an enthusiast on science, maybe I should have started a company sigh

I need a detailed image of someone's brain neurons and synapses in real time. It has to be in vivo and non-invasive so the standard microscopy technique where you need to open someone's brain and skull is out of the question, that leaves me with spectroscopy technique like Raman spectroscopy. So I've studied(glance through) most spectroscopy technique that could map the neurons such as the infrared spectroscopy, but the image resolution is in the micro meter scale, so you cannot image the neurons clearly. The plasmonic resonance imaging is also in the micro meter scale. The methods stated above is using light photons as a medium(electromagnetic radiation). So what could generate a super resolution image in the nanometer scale, I turned to electron microscope as it generates a very detailed image because of its wavelength property. And thus electron spectroscopy with high frequency alternating current to penetrate the tissue and image the neurons and synapses. This is my speculation of what could generate a nano scale image of the brain and neurons. So the question is, what spectroscopy technique (photon/electron) could generate a clear image of the neurons and synapses (in nano scale resolution) and nerve signals running in real time in vivo non-invasively?

This might be the answer: Alternating Current Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy with Simultaneous Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry

Or would it turn into a plasma?

Yes I know if I actually want to implement this I would follow the steps in post 1. The question I have is what is the difference between CPU and GPU. For instance, from the youtube video I posted, could there be a CPU tensorflow instead? And how would a CPU tensorflow differ from a GPU tensorflow. Apparently to my knowledge the GPU tensorflow would be more efficient(faster) because of its clock speed because a GPU is pretty much consisted of multiple clocks. So for the sparse octree is it also CPU powered or GPU powered and what is the difference? P.S Ya well 3D voxels are awesome

Thanks for the clarification, I was wondering about that too pulse vs wavelength. In this case, is it possible to generate a high frequency electron wave to examine the tissue? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_electron_wave

Hi, yes, I am looking for a 3D object tracking system based on GPU, I'll take a look at sparse octree, thanks

Alright, here is my conclusion, let me know if it is correct :D. For electromagnetic radiation(light photon) to penetrate tissue it needs to have a really high frequency, such as the x-rays. Like wise for electron spectroscopy to image the brain tissue in vivo it needs to have a high frequency too, else it would stop at the skin, or the skull. To fix this. An ultrafast electron microscopy could be used, one at a femtosecond scale to generate a high frequency electron wave capable of penetrating the tissue. Just like how a femtosecond laser(photon) could be used to generate high frequency x-ray. I am looking for the difference between a photon laser and an electron laser, I hope I made the correct speculation. Please feel free to correct my idea

So I took an interest in brain neurons synapses computing. As you know there are billions of neurons and trillion of synapses in a person's body. To simulate the nerve impulse running in these synapses I turn to multiple GPUs as I believe it has enough power to simulate the brain better than CPUs like a Titan GPU Supercomputer compares to other CPU based supercomputer. But now to do an analysis on the neurons and synapses I will have to get down to track the neurons and nerve signals molecules(Na+,k+). To track these things require a 3D structural identification technique. For instance I leave a bag inside a building and I scan the entire build and store the points, then I use 3D graphics analysis to try and find this bag inside a building. This task, I am not sure if it can be done using GPU or CPU as it is computationally intensive. I am not even sure if the current levels of hardware would permit something like this.

Ya you are correct, it is about the time domain in mainly capturing very fast processes like enzyme interactions. I am taking a liking on SEM and cryo-electron spectroscopy, pretty much all methods of electron microscopy as it generates a very detailed image.

Alright, there is a person standing there. I am intending to take a high resolution neuronal live cell imaging of the person non-invasively in real time. I've looked through all types of microscopy techniques, which, you know, requires you to look through a microscope without the neurons being blocked by the skull. With the finest detail being an electron microscope that is, but to look through a sample, you would need to generate a 3D mesh, so I look into spectroscopy, which generates a hyperspectral data based on the Raman spectroscopy if you know what I am talking about. So simple laser spectroscopy, how detail does it get? There is Raman spectroscopy and all kinds but I eventually hit plasmonic resonance imaging, which is by far the most detailed laser imaging you can find that is without speed. The resolution detail gets to a few microns. And then I found femtosecond spectroscopy, the group that belongs to ultra fast laser spectroscopy, and their neuronal images resolution is by far the most promising. My question is why do you need a femtosecond speed laser for high resolution? Does a stand still laser impossible to generate a high resolution image?

Hmm, there are two ways I can think of that goes about modifying the memory. If you have to relocate the synapses by activating proteins with the plasmonic laser. Or if you can "target" a specific neuron, drink a potion and attempt to have the memory rewire itself. I haven't thought of a method where you can "target" a specific neuron with drugs, but drinking something and gaining a set of memories sounds pretty cool right?

Looks like the dream master haven't done anything @@, I still got my common sense , if they don't ruin someone with brain cancer by accident

Well yes, I dunno Kung Fu, looks like you've found out , I think sensei gave up on me. Anyway, theoretically if I stick a new synapse here and there in the brain and allow a connection to pass through and form a pattern I could theoretically gain access to memory I do not have before. 40% is not a lot, the TMS probably just makes you more alert. However, if you've taken a drug that would make any pattern in the brain stays permanently(I am saying photographic memory). Brain is already a huge electric field, it is the learning process that matters. No offense, it is still an interesting research, everything has to start somewhere

Cool things you've mentioned. Is it possible to cause a memory formation with transcranial magnetic stimulation? Like inserting a manual about how to pilot helicopters into the brain like the Matrix. Or suddently knows how to speak Japanese like the movie Dude Where's My Car. Or a simple inception of thought into the mind like "cow can fly". I think the last one requires overriding the synapse. Like if someone use transcranial magnetic stimulation on my arms and legs they would move on its own. I dunno how many synapses I got in the brain, but once I've learned something I can recall it instantly like how to play Super Smash. Anyway this seems like an interesting topic P.S Of course modifying existing memory is harder, I mean you don't just keep adding brain cells or synapses to make more memories, else the brain would be too big for the head.

We are constantly storing new memories, but is it possible to modify existing memories? Sure if you hit the head with a baseball bat you ought to forget a few things, but what if you can modify the memory with electromagnetic radiation? What if you can modify even the most basic logical concept? Sounds pretty cool heh.

I'm a vampire , unless you hit duds this gun powder thing would be kind of tricky to deal with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder Right, that'll stop the fusion chain reaction

True, but seriously, how many people go around threatening people with a bow and arrow except the mocking jay?