blue89

hi;

I have sent a letter to harvard and said them that I cancelled all considerations across this university. according to my contention the recommendation letter is quite fault requirement to make it mandatory. I respect everyone's ideas. But I strictly criticized harvard and cancelled the consideration.

There exist some details. nature is in silence. as I understand they are willing to take articles from me. But I need economic support. this is unique necessity. I do not need anything else (MSc ,PhD any of these is not the thing which I am looking for.)

because I believe I have ability to learn by myself at first and moreover ,while believe and I am willing to do science,I am more interested in inventions.

My paper was around 3000 words and declined by nature photonics. while I presubmitted two standard articles too to nature ,I actually do not think to continue before solution for economic matters. furthermore I would leave from turkey as soon as possible.

Photonics Output

21st October 2016

Dear Mr Tunc

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Project Outlines : ...(hidden,development,science)".

I'm sorry to say that we cannot offer to publish it in Nature Photonics as we have concluded that it falls outside the scope and aims of the journal and does not have sufficient relevance for our readership. I am sorry that we cannot respond more positively.

Yours sincerely,

Oliver Graydon
Editor
Nature Photonics

The paper was brief. the wholly form probably would be very long such a PhD thesis. some formulas are strict. But surely I believe I do not need any remarked courses. Chief Editor as you see did not warn any language and / or spelling fault. I did care it. and I do not believe that my language is so much bad as assessed in the past.

careless & intelligent

That statement is illogical - just because you found no reference to it doesn't mean it does not exist. The more logical explanation would be that you failed to find the evidence whilst searching.

haha :-) this is your personal idea.(but I respect your thought,ok you are free how to think)

illogical why I know ajb is Editor at one journal at real ,and at once he said "if I see no reference at any paper ,I will reject it" :-)

but while you are right ,about my responsibility, I think I am unable to be good at everything or every subject. so failing to find evidence is NORMAL.

and so supposing logical me to have failed finding reference must be just illogical

I am leaving now. there exists some e-mails which must be replied by me. furthermore nature physics sent me a new e-mail ,but automatical and require me to fullfill something and it is said that they would meet me.

by the by, I saw forum's rules. I must read them carefully.

I am not someone who is impolite ,weak or ...

I have quite opt,imistic personality.

DETECTED !!

I have taken one warning ,so , I will definitely leave and not write at least for two months

if you would like me to be there, you have to fold this.

(any question will not be responded ,no difference on issue that who asks)

BY BY

blue89

That is because you do not understand what he is implying because you do not speak the same language.

I have been feeling exhausted ,I don't agree this idea.

be aware that ,I will add you to my ignored list if you continue this subject.

my explanations which are up to now should be enough

Are you calling me dishonest? Please answer "yes" or "no".

NO!

But you seem a bit disracted in your ideas.

haha haa ha :-)

one of the most entertaining (fine) personality @studiot haha ...

could you reply again my question which had been asked as a first time around 3-4 months ago.

why did not you accept friendship with me on facebook???

Really appreciable sayings haha :-) (positive ✓ )

I only remember ,you said : "I am too old to use facebook" I don't think that it would prevent.

is it logical or illogical?? or neither logical nor illogical? which one ? :-)

(note: I had met a christian woman ,really she was very good (qualified according to entertainment as I define, like you)

ajb is more elite in communication skill than me (not linguistic ,approach implied). this is clear. (now comparison exists,if you think it is incorrect ,sorry.)

I recommend that moderator replace this thread to another forum (lounge preferred) and change the title.

Hello, Blue,

 

As regards logical and illogical there are other types of statement

These are just a statements of (verifiable) fact.

 

They are neither logical nor illogical.

 

This was not logical or illogical . ✘

 

 

 

if there exist any question (sometimes the question is given by hinting only) , I think everything should be logical or illogical ,if you want me to assess this circumstance, I may it politely. but I see more than one event there.

another occasion : ajb says ,"there already exists usage of >3D in engineering". but I could not see any reference yet. so ,it is illogical now.

1)I do not think that this is great English - anyway, just drop 'elite' from future posts. It may not seem so rude when translated to Turkish, but in English it is a rather strange and insulting thing to say.

 

2)Anyway, we are way off topic here!

1)okay. this is right! (In this case I would express that anyone did not see me ,live)

2) off topic. this is also right. but we did not do somethings which are so bad.

anyway, imatfaal may change this topic to another forum. Really I remember I was saying loved this personality (imatfaal) ,but look he prefer not to see this notation. I believe he has also clever personality and seem poistive (like studiot)

but I have been feeling surprised from his notation. look he is feeling annoyed above.(previous page)

QUOTE: "OK - if they want me to leave the forum..."

 

How on earth did you come to that conclusion? Misunderstanding again due to a language problem for sure.

 

 

By saying you are elite it implies that you are better. That is what it means.

No,There is no comparison.

in my opnion you are cunfusing . I only mentioned something about my personality. (but there is no comparison)

I also enjoy to see someone are giving comliments to their own personality.

like this :When Studiot was beginning his own comment with this sentence "Let see more perspective idea..."

surely I feel very happy. I mean YOU WILL FEEL BETTER IF YOU GIVE COMPLIMENTS TO YOUR OWN PERSONALITY.

MORE OBJECTIVELY

I mean if anyone give compliments to his/her own personality ,Then He/she feels and be better. (this is belief) surely ,there is no comparison.

I only did do this. (no comparison)

In English saying that you are elite is exactly saying that you are better than all or most of the members here.

was not it so :

I am more elite than you or

I am the most elite person ?

1)It is strange and impolite to imply that you are better than someone else.

2)I promise you that by keep saying that you are elite will not gain you any friends.

both of these are right!

but I don't remember that I implied I was better than anyone.

1)You should stop calling yourself elite - it is rather self-centred and annoying.

 

2)Anyway, back on topic... is there anything else about the applications of mathematics in engineering you want to know?

1) I imply only scientific context but (not apperance or not ego ,be sure)

2) :-) :-)

really I thought imatfaal was lovely, I also think I love everyone. but remember feeling nervous does not mean contradiction with this and almost every subject will have relation as I said before.

no question ,thanks.

it is rather self-centred ...

??????

it is strange

may I ask ,why do you think so?

If you are still taking moderation comments and questions as insults then it points to a language problem which you claim not to have. When the mods ask questions like that it is to get you to think about something - if you take offence at it then you have misunderstood what was said (again).

ok. if they want me to leave the forum. I may make it by my own. any elite person will not be demanding to remain where he is not wanted.

I don't think that I am speaking insultive. (sure!)

where is any insultive expression belonging me,show it to me ?

I think imatfaal will feel regretfull at the end if he is thinking intimately.

I know this. he did not see how Dr.Krettin used DISGUSTING words. (at another forum(s).

and if you are able to show me any insultive expression ,I will apologise.

you did not show me (??)

if you are asking a general definition of ethics , this is quite simple to give brief information. (very very simple ! , so simple that I think you should not ask! )

ok. I will make some definitions or give some instructions. (you are making me exhausted!, although I am quite series and state that I am speaking honestly ,your all questions are repetead actions ,stop please to do this and / or don't do this over 3 three times so as not to miss ideal communication!,I am not feeling happy in such cases or anyone who thinks he/she is intelligent will not feel happy,but I see almost all of questions are repeated action ,if my life conditions were not so bad , probably I would not feel so nervous or depressed))

GENERAL ETHICS

it is related/about moral values ,and originated right or wrong conducts. human right will be highly important as I always try to make someone understand. my experiences are generally based on normative ethical contexts ,but this does not mean that I don't know anything about theoritical context ,why we generally and already have to know basic concepts related any subject to make any application or to understand in practice mod.

as it expressed repeatedly ,once again I would remind that there will exist some usages based upper analysis applications to dominate some ethical contexts for some wide range of society and/or to describe or to prove some invisible or insufficient theories in ethics via using mathematical theories. (most of them will be taken from algebra and analsysis)

once again ,I would express that I have creative personality and DON'T use traditional methods. some references are already detected. probably someones understand when I use "new methods" they suppose that I would use something quite strange or meaningless

They should understand anyone will already be attentrve for not to use meaningless methods. this shows they have no enough ability how to thing thinking perspective was.

(check please Respective scientist Nikola Tesla ' s words / principles and something more about him. or what was avicennas implication to make some new candidates to be great scientist like us.(unfortunately I can't see a strong or series candidate. whenever I mention about such great scientists ,I see everyone confuses something - they suppose like I am making compasion between them- I never did this. I only expressed my admirations to them. I never violate such sensitive general rules. but of course we don't know what would happen in the future (only))

ADVANCEMENT IN USAGE OF ETHICS & HOW TO USE IT AT THE TOP OF SCIENCE

Once ,you need to think how ethical experiences were. for instance anyone doesn't deserve to insult you. you don't deserve to insult anyone even if you be announced as the most intelligent person in this modern century. if you check the related contexts about ethics ,you will be able to find out this and this is not difficult to understand.

how to use it.

Remember what Leonardo Da vinci was saying when he died. his this last expressions are defining quite easily how to understand.

Remember He said; "I am sad ,I hoped to make something more to contribute developments to science"

if you think/investigate the reason ,it will be possible to find more easily what was the actual reason and what was the relation to usage of ethics in science.

Please Don't express anything anymore about usage of language. I have been quite exhausted to make explanations about this.

once again ,I surely believe : I have ability to study independently , I know and accept that my english level is not advanced.but you are always missing and you made me quite bored to explain that I have no convenient conditions to make you delighted on this issue (my keyboard is spoilt,moreover I am sure,if there was any else more relief option ,I would be able to respond all of your question in the best was ,even how yopu want and upper. stop plese to mention anything about it. you may ask something only ,ask where you have not understood,then I will reply.

these are enough explanations.

ok?

1) logical and

2)illogical mean?

1) logical , when you allege anything you have to provide at least one evidence (like reference or quite intelligiable and acceptable evidence) (prefer to give academic reference please in order not to live any matter)

2) illogical, when you allege something but unable to provide any reference / evidence

this queries shows us , at least one of these (about academic / mathematics)

--->> you are not enough (insufficient) for mathematical skill (especially perspective aspect)

--->> you have no sufficient mathematical knowledge (only mathematical)

Really the ethical contexts are too wide. I am unable to tell now (I am at universty hospital for presentation (oncology değartment) )

but simply,it will be about "human rights and manner of intellectualism at science"

DO NOT USE BAD WORDS!!!

NEVER DO THIS , Dr.krettin is in my ignored list. I don't see his comments and...

HE IS UNCULTURED & UNSUCCCESSFUL (he is too weak scientist!)

blue89

Blue89, you use the words logic and illogical a lot. Could you please provide a succinct, brief and clear definition of what you think those words mean?

SHOW ME WHICH one ANY OF THEM IS "ILLOGICAL" ??

I hope you will not be unethic (or uncultured as Dr.Krettin)

....

Remember please other instructions about my personality , I am stressed and feel quite exhaustive to repeat something to someone ..

REMEMBER PLEASE ,I AM NOT TRADITIONAL AND NOT A WEAK SCIENTIST ACCORDING TO MY IDEAS.

THERE EXIST ENOUGH INFORMATON NOW TO RALIASE THIS...

I request you not to violate BOTH GENREAL ETHICAL PSRINCIPLES AND PRINCIPLES WHICH ARE RELATED TO ETHICS OF SCIENCE

the last one is containing advanced rules & approaches.

blue89

 

It's OK to mention a quote from Stephen Hawking. It's NOT OK to link to a reply you made in another thread that mentions the quote.

1)That's promoting/advertising, and while it's not commercial (!), it's also unnecessary and unappreciated. It's better to just copy/paste and give credit for the quote from Hawking in the current thread.

 

2)People don't want to click your link. Because that's the longer way. It's not useful. (this reaaon is not enough or doesn't seem enough logical)

sorry to write lack word.

my keyboard i spoilt and sometimes it does not write some words. (the correct form should (have) be(en) "one moderator implys ....we should NOT quote ...." ("NOT" Could not be written ,sorry for this)

1) I NEVER SUPPORT SOMEONES WHO ARE DISHONEST! (yur comment seems like to reminiscent something just like CONFLICT OF INTEREST (!)

2) may I ask ,why did you prefer to use that (subject) pronoun : "your" , this was not necessity , and why don't you prefer to criticize your own ideas before criticizing any idea?

while ,this have some good ways in your opinion , this is not enough to reach that goal (that you implied to be easier to use the forum)

as you see ,I enjoy to write long comments at scientific subjhects and please be aware that I WILL ALMOST EVERYTIME BE SERIES AT SCIENTIFIC SUBJECTS.

I prefer to write long ,REASON: to be able to give all details so as not to make feel someone missing required detail and so to make them prefer criticizing quickly (This is intention).

sorry to speak so strictly to an elderly scientist. but you have not Cused all else ways if you are complaining now from this tongue

(it's including a bit tension,but this is not right for manner of science to create USEFUL results)

Yes, but other series and expansions are used in engineering - a quick look at a few wikipedia pages will tell you more.

this is not discussion.

WHERE IS THE RELIABLE EVIDENCE....???

ajb ,do you know that the time is 01.39 there :) (after midnight)

haha yes

I think Hawking is talking about the possibility of higher dimensional space-times, so something like 9+1 dimensional space-time. Everyone in physics and engineering is okay with working with spaces that are of dimension greater than 3, they come up quite naturally in classical mechanics, thermodynamics and so on. But this is not the same as the 3+1 dimensional space-time as given in relativity.

 

 

, of course the time's character will definitely be changed!

that was not the actual implication of hawking ...

he is realistic.

THANKS FOR YOUR NOBLE!

I have to go ,at least for not to live worse matters about my eyes.

I think you mean 4D plus dimensional space-times rather than the use of higher dimensional spaces in physics and engineering in general.

inner product??

if it is so,no. some hilberd spaces are not euclidean.

WE NEED STRONGER EVIDENCES FOR >3D spaces (actual proof) LIKE STEPHEN HAWKING IMPLIED IN HIS PAPER.

read please this the most respectıve scientist's paper if you are interested in.

He was quite realistic at that paper when he used this sentence "We predict that 3D space would be..."

he means ,we are already able to formulate these spaces for a long time

but there still there is no reality ....at real :-)

Fourier series is used all over the place when a periodic signals/phenomena are present. For example

i) Signal and image processing
ii) Finding solutions to the heat equation and similar
iii) In the theory of small perturbations
iv) Acoustics
v) Optics

etc etc etc

could you show me please any of the picture which are red coloured ??

note the second one is definitely not acceptable!

(equation!)

etc etc etc

hah ha ha ha :) :)

what a cute expression

(DrKrettin is such ones Uncultured (his culture is too lack ) and he is impolite (not inelegant ,impolite ,elegance is upper level than politeness) and also illogical in particular idfeas,sorry krettin)

I still don't understand - you want me to show you a picture of what?

let show me any element of such sequences or functional sequences ...or any usage in engineering.

I also have no enough knowledge. one moderator was speaking blaming . but this is already general / UNIVERSAL truth that anyone cannot be good at all subjects.

I accept this. this is logical.

TOPOLOGIC USAGE (PICTURING MAY BE USEFUL IN ENGINEERING ,BUT HOW THE POSSIBILITY IS ..?

I Know that topology is not easy to learn , almost all of students were failing at this course in BSc (>> 80 % )

look the shape (but this does not seem too corelative ) picture entitled : "A continuous deformation (a type of homeomorphism) of a mug into a doughnut (torus) and back"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology

but unfortunately this is not so strong (not aceptable enough)

....

I am not quite sure what you are asking, but various sequences and expansions are used in engineering all the time. The two common series are of course the Taylor series and the Fourier series.

picture are telling. let continue on facebook later.

I don't feel me relief there

SOME UNCULTURED & IMPOLITE AND ALSO ILLOGICAL MEMBERS ARE DETECTED.

I am not quite sure what you are asking, but various sequences and expansions are used in engineering all the time. The two common series are of course the Taylor series and the Fourier series.

therse are also not acceptable.

Laurent series are upper than Taylor series and I know these.

...

I have to sleep (I suffer from my eyes.)

So classical mechanics does not correlate to reality? (with the standard assumptions of domain of validity and so on.)

feel relief ,I see the wisdom. (you are trying to make me remember nt to be off topic.)

ok here is the answer.

with extreme probability : YES

Because we need both formula and picturing (appearance and / or strongly active usage)

look the pictures.and remember

EUCLID space was constructed with only three general planes (no existence of extra plane) ..

and Span of Euclid.

I did not see all material which you implied ,but probably you will be able to make formulizate ,but will not be able to give picture.

and I am also unsure for acceptable formulization.

otherwise

when we use such these sequences/functions or functional sequences ,it will normally (already) show a usage of formuliation

1) R ⊂ N , T ⊂ N ,S ⊂N , M ⊂ N

An : R x T x S x M → R

any of element An is in shape of (n₁,n₂,n₃,n₄) 4D dimension ✓

2) Fn : R x T x N x S x M (but there all of these sets are ⊂ R , x ϵ R , y ϵ T , z ϵ N , t ϵ S

n ϵ N

Fn(x,y,z,t) = x²n.√y . e^2xyz. z.∫ log(t) dt 4D functional sequence ✓

according to theoritic (pure) mathematics ,it is not problem to show such expressions convergence or invergence.

but where is the usage of these functions or sequences.

and where is any picture of these sets element?

this pictures shows the real apperance / picturing / usage of 3D space (Euclid) ✓

I was implying such materials.

nevertheless , my field is analysis now (not geometry). I do not know what you implied.

so,I am unable to satate clearly whether you are right or incorrect.

Good nights.

Anyway, lots of people in physics and engineering use spaces of dimension greater than 3 (even infinite dimensions).

we need the actual correlation with REALITY ...like stephen hawking's words.

check please his paper which are related black holes.

ok. anyone doesn't deserve or doesn't have to read my texts which are containing speling or grammatical errors.

well, I DON'T HAVE TO SEE/READ ILLOGICAL IDEAS

they are forgetting that I am mathematician and always check whether any idea was logical or not at first step.

and I am sure someones idea are QUITE ILLOGICAL. why don't they think the reason why they were not great scientist???

they are missing ,both nature and science aaas are also contain many useless type of academic papers.

-if they would like to say they don't like me ,this is not problem which is belonging me.

but if they are thinking that they don't like my scientific words, ok this will mean a problem which is belonging me

***THEY SHOULD NOT MAKE ASSESSMENT ON AYNONE's PERSONALITY , THEY SHOULD MAKE ASSSSMENT ON SCEINETIFIC ALLEGEMENTS***

I am leaving there , good nights.

blue89

You seem to want to bring it back to bashing pure maths!

:-)

someone will never see the correct truth until I get published the material how I think it was.

You seem to want to bring it back to bashing pure maths!

what about to continue on facebook for a while tomorrow

I don't feel me relief now there.

I may tell some parts of any project that might persuade you. (I had shared one project:'s big part with studiot, why I trusted him)

??

1) You only cite things that are related no matter what the subject.

 

2) It is hard to say, but for sure you cannot compare across subjects. There are different habits and traditions across different subjects. The impact factor only takes into account citations of papers that are published in the previous two years - 3)in more theoretical and mathematical subjects it can take longer than two years for a paper to pick up citations. Thus, mathematical journals tend to have low IF as compared to say medical journals. ✓

 

Anyway, this seems to be getting off topic. ✓

1) I am smiling :-) :-) 2) yes it's true. 3) thats why while mathematical / theoritical materails are too difficult -contain heavily difficult formulas & theories - ,theoritical materials does not provide good beneficts - or are not lucrative- so , this even takes too much time to evaluate them. 3) I don't know the reason why to be so bad thing to be off topic. but of course if editors/moderators would protect the thread to be quite disracted ,they this will be right! ✓ ,I only said we may find some new things (interdisciplinary) by such conversations and I am sure we are innocent ,we don't deserve to be annoyed or angered

anyway,I am already trying not to be off topic but I am not lonely who do this. I also think that I may dominate controlling this balance (it's not so difficult) I cannot reach the rules of forum because of crowded traffic now