blue89

hi , thanks for all of your nice posts ,but I were planning to send a letter by e-mail to some publishing assocciations. I thought they may help me if I send them a record. what are your opinions about this ,is this logical ? however ,ok we may explore something just in creating music related scinece too , remember please Leonardo Da Vinci's golden ratio. I am also planning to cite this subject in one of my article that I would make it publish.but unforunately/really this thread is more about economy.

really ,I think you have provided a little information. and because of this I will try to write only general information in common. first of all I have alredy stated that I am analysist and and calculus is beginning of analysis (or a stage before beginning analysis) ,for instance these all these defines analysis generally stage to stage in relevancy (1) -->> solutions for parabola and second graded equations ,trigonomtry , logarithm , complex plane , derivation and integral for only functions have 1 variables (2) -->> calculus ( * ) (3) -->> limits and its variety for several variabled functions (4) -->> derivation and integral for several variabled functions & sequences (5) -->> euler integrals and forms & solutions (6) -->> topologic convergence and divergence , relations with various of functions and being continuous , compact & T1 &T2 &T3 (spaces) (7) -->> general topology & relations (note: topology is not separate from analysis at real,this is new department) (8) -->> beginning spaces , metric ,normic , inner product integral & other spaces and speacial forms for convergency (divergency) (optional) (8) -->> measure theorie (Lebesgue integral form) , and progress (upper) (optional) (8) -->> complex forms ,analysis on complex plane , cauchy-riemann equations ,laurent series and progress (upper) ( optional) (9) -->> MsC & PhD doctoral programmes (optional) but I see you would be more intersted in physics (not mathematics) ,in this I request you to provide us more information about your current knowledge like I written. for instance you may make a simple map like this.(your knowledge) -->> high school's physics (calculating simple electric circuits,condensers, optics and computings,lenses ..etc) -->> newton principles and its effects (includind calculations) -->> electric intervals and forms -->> magnetism (e.g.amper principle) -->> optics and photoelectrics all these are generally stage to stage in physics and most of them (except the first one) probably will require you using " progressive integral forms" and some more difficult techniques (eg. using "right hand" principle is generally not so easy in my opinion especially it was difficult when I were studying for amper theorie/principle.) all these subjects and making improvement are not so easy exactly. this means you need to be closely ,quite patient. as I implied I am probably not same other scientists, thats why I do not need someone to tell me almost all and related these subjects and progress for learning. (intimately I have experienced it too many times) I implied that I have (probably) some different features in my previous comment.look please according to my own principles all these features in personal characters will affect directly at background (but because of appearance of its silence , it is generally not being thought that it affects ,it is probably being thought it affects a very little and indirectly) ,ok you may accept them only my belief if anyone thinks so ,too. -->> ambition ( ) -->> patience -->> nerve&anger (!) -->> irritation & aggression (!) -->> happiness ( :-) ) -->> relief & comfort ( ) unfortunately economic status is very important.and also I think one of the most important parameter. I had lived too much strict problems and still live finally ,some other features are take importance too, to be realistic. for instance when I speak with someone I quite think that he/she should understand at one/first time , then probably someone do not know this point too , because I am sure I can understand at only one/first time. if someones repeat the same thing this make me anger and especially sometimes I shout them why they are repeating the same thing.(My mother is uneducated ,she repeats ame things many times and really I live too much difficulty) I also observed that this complaint is densely related/relevant to educational status but really the quality of education is also effective. I don't trust that there is necessity to someone telling to those ones who would like to learn something in science. (it is clear for me) ,your timely expression seems enough ,but I recommend that you read all this text in relevancy, as a whole picture. good lucks blue.

really I do not know your level, you had better shoıw it especially whats you know. I am mathematician (analysist) and I think especially some parts of physics are more difficult than subjects in content of mathematics. and it is clear that mathematics -physics have too much relation(s) each among subjects in their contents. and sometimes have similar or mutual rules/principles. probably I have extraordinary features, and I request you to let us learn your level. then it might be better to make some useful suggesttions.I also recommend that you add other related statements such as how much time you may study daily for this, how kind personality you have (relief or aggressive) , how old you are and what your economic status is. note please I can give only direction tutorial and with extreme probbaility my offers would/could be different in comparison other mathematicians and physicists.and it would be good to express in addition : (I think) I am not expert at any subject of physics currently now.

hi cute young :-) it is not important other's feelings on your appearanca at real. the most important thing is your health . it means ,if you do not have any complaint , it should not be problem. (note: my height is :170, weight is: ~ 60. in comparison with you,yes you seem a bit weak.) NOTE: I thought this forum is more about scientific conversations, then (I think) you had better go a doctor(to take assistance) rather than opening a thread there.) have a very healthy life

NOTE: any question has not been detected!/found!.. hi, I am functional analysist. this theorie simply is being evaluated at functional analysis (rather than real analysis (measure theorie (!) , I would request you to remember that functional analysis own (especially sometimes) will contain (already) real analysis. in other words , already mathematics own has a very different language/spesification in comparison with other parts of scence. ok. (I would express (only) cantor theorie and how to find its proof. proof. binali musayev,nizami mustafayev ,murat alp; analysis III . (this source is not written in english language) NOT: the relation with functional ananlysis is just assessments own. (the proof at above is being told using metric spaces' Axioms/spesifications.otherwise it is already related basic analysis. (not progressive to functional analysis or real analysis) related phrases and explanations relevant key words. 1) remember please ,being closed & opened & margin values & limit values & compact ..etc. are all being assessed at both topology and functional analysis. 2) any functional analysist would be highly interested in whether any space/interval is complete or not. (this is too much important. and it is not important which space it was ,e.g: Lebesgue Space ,lp or lq (1/p+1/q=1) , c,C[a,b],integral space , or other new spaces (like mines ,I am trying to create a new one!) ..etc. 4) I recommend that you check these words : lipschitz, cauchy sequences, functional (cauchy) sequences,linear&nonlinear ,convergence, divergence. (all these are basic at real) regards.

I think I have already explained everything that this would not be intended being loose idea. to create something useful (to be respectiveI ,this will already be required. this is not discussion. but the quite important thing : I would give emphasis that experiment/observation would be compulsory to be able to speak how it was. (loose , useful , great,..etc). it seems I should reserach by my own. I will read related instructions on the net. thanks for our scientific conversation up to now.

patents ,because ecancermedicalsceince journal's kind editor offered me .. but she added ; some journals may have some protocols to protect your ideas (copyright )( everyone is speaking that this would be more about patent..I am young scientist and still do not know every procedures in relation or currency)

hi dear symphatic friend; do you believe that anyone might invent a new sample shape of "ultrasound machine" only by himself/herself own?? I think this will generally be impossible.this is interdisciplinary study and collaboration will be required (collaborate with at least a doctor + engineer/scientist(mathematician+physician+engineer (eee or like ce) or other related ones)) my principle the literature's own or numeric numbers are not so important exactly in my opinion, I think we need/should to explore something useful/efficacious to people. (universai/not partial) then we can only be respective/genius via using this information!.. then,I think you may miss some details, think please we would like to create a new useful(applicable) theorie ,but we are not engineer ,we are mathematician or physician (scientist) ,how will we be able protect it??

really I am interested in such subjects. (but all these are relevant SCIENCE (mathematics-physics) (not religion)).

lets forget please everything for a while and compare these comments and then start smiling friendly 1) 2) 3) :-)

haha haha haha haha :) :) haha ha ajb I love almost all your expressions haha ha

ok. look please; I am expressing that I am respective or I would be respective & great scientist. this means it will not be important whom I am being speaking&contacting. in my opinion every people are important & estimable as equal as me. and this will not be changed in the future. this is principle. but I remember; although I am contacting successfully withj some good official associations (like harvard , some journals,and native english friends.) ,you have complaint three times from language. then I asked the first question. , you may see me I am speaking with ajb or other frieng more politely. because I know he has over MSc degree and this generally requires studying hard. But be sure that I am also studying hard , and think please anyone who would be at harvard will not be happy due to taking some expresions over only one times. I think I can understand generally at one time. this is not problem. I already have been a bit surprising ,and said you may try to be more elegant.but do not miss that according to my principle you will have at least equal regards that I give my own personality. (!!: this is principle every human is estimable , all these , have no importance for me: age & nationality & gender & economic status.) then , I think it would be logical not writing every properties of literature. I apologise if I missed something that you imply I did do it incorrectly. sample project like I implied (in the past): you know ultrasound device(US).if you think its efficacies in medicine ,then you will not think that it seems commercial.(it is implied before invention) but if you consider its sale (convenient improvement in electric-electronic engineering), of course you will think it is commercial. then -->> this sample is the most convenient and may make it more clear simply which kinfd of study I would do. additional comment: I do not believe that our (all) degrees would show genuine/intelligence. this may show only the rate of how much (hard) we are studying. and also this is not the certitude. because quality is not same at every universiteis when/if I hurt someone,really I feel me more negatively affected than her/him. I am leaving now from forum if I did do this. (elderly people are more sensitive ) by ,I hope to see tomorrow.

1) may I ask what is your nationality & how old are you, and also in which level now your studies are being spread over? (BSc ,MSc , PhD) 2) of course , but I would give emphasis that the project is interdisciplinary.

I am sure everything is coming on together (interdisciplinary) each with them.(collaboration is required! *** interdisciplinary***) them ,I remember that patent institute implied that demonstration was required. but this term was used more relevant to "definition/description. then when I called to turkish patent instituıte on telephone ,they said me that they would assess all qualifications below. -->> whether it was unique or not -->> whether it was original or not -->> there must not be so similar other sample. it should belong to author/inventor. these are already known. then according to mines ; , -->> it contains generally allegements. there is no proof that the allegement is true or not. to be able to talk about this section ,the observation(s)/experiment(s) are required. then , because of being interdisciplinary ,of course it may provide us commercial products. why not . it is interdisciplinary. this is rudiment literature.I hoped / expected to take supports via using my such studies. then here is an contradiction (in my opinion) you say/imply ,if there is almost the tiny difference between the two prototype of projects , it would be required to take a new one (patent). In this case I would remind that everyone says (and also you say) ,that taking patent is not easy , and only one of them may require high expenses (!).

:) follow please.

dear ajb. really sometimes commonly I think your expressions seem symphatic. but don't you see/realise that somethings are making improvement difficult due to meaningless reasons? think please ,thomas edison had not done only one experiment for his special invention. then ,I am sure to create something great ,experiments/observations would be required.

yes of course ,(why not)but unfortunately this own depends on the results of experiments. experiments/observations are required. compulsory.

really although mathematics' content is own approxiametly over %90 theoritic. I would and I give high possibility to create its applications. forgive for this expressions but ,I do not enjoy only theoritic studies. because I believe this will not provide us enough efficacies. follow please ,I would respond to strange. his comment seems important. think please ,here is a project ,and it's features are below. -->> it requires over at least two disciplines for implemention -->> it requires obeservation(s)/experimen(s) -->> it has been started with only hyphothesis , but can not be reached to any results without experiment(s)/observation(s). however , yes all comments are intelligiable and also I were pointing out to some of them. but it is clear we can create technologies by improving science. then it is also clear mathematical theories would be useless by assessment in only mathematical departments and/ot experts.(I believe collaboration is required,this comment is for ajb) note: it would be good to express that I think my studies would be newest. I think it should be true ,I could not hear any sample like them.

really I do not agree this idea. because when I thought/talked about contacting with harvard ,everyone said to me the same opinion. but this were not true. I have taken 3-4 letter totally from that schoold. the last one was 2 week ago. and it was telling me that office was not evaluating projects,too.and they reccommended me to contact based so particular considerations with other convenient office in the list they written in the content of that last e-mail,via choosing one of them. (the first one was harvard GSE , this was incorrectness of me , but GSE already reccommended me to contact with gsas , and gsas's offer was/is above.) but in relevancy of your comment ,yes probably being unique would/should be true. but I wonder whether it would be too difficult using only this way,I would remind that all projects will/might not be scientific (is it compulsory?). however , I have sent my project's abstract to ecancermedicalscience journall's editor due to her request. but when she asked me that she would learn if I had any else question, I had asked her whether it would be possible to publish our scientific projects at the journals to protect them. then she replied ; some journals might have some protocols for this.but also she added that journals were not publishing project outlines. here is quite important problem : if at each country's patent institutes are unique and normally this makes it difficult improvement of science. how will we be able to do it. it is not logical. there should have been other useful ways

ok. really I also do not know what would be more specific. this was only prediction. but I realised that some bussiness assiciations and academics reporting some varying clues and most of them are being more effective after application. these all qualifications are known already. (it means these are general..)because all these are written in their website and yes ,turkish patent institute requires the same or approximately similar specifications.I am not demanding really to remain at turkey. simply all problems are politics. then I thought that it would be better taking patent from U.S. and if I had any intelligiable option ,I would immeadiaytely leave there ok. I see strange is far from there and has some information about china , yes this would be good writing so other related subjects. I remember I have written a letter to U.S ' s patent institute,but it has not been responded for three days. another query: is it unique association which exists to give patent at u.s.a.? (in turkey it is unique I know)

ok.thanks again.

ajb :-) you are completely right. but I do not know the reason ... I can not controll me smiling now :-) ok.I will try to try ,though. :-) thanks for your symphatic portrait.

(forgive for asking but.. )do you believe that this would be seriesly useful way ?? really I don't believe check/look please did ,inna , claydee , rihanna ,faydee, nancy ajram , follow the same way you suggested ?? it would be highly comic but I can not reach these artists to ask :) (although I am quite handsome)

haha hahaa :-) :-) my lovely friends have come. ajb your offer seems a bit comic. then strange ,I think you may be more elegant if you care it. but really both explanations are cute. (I am series ) haha ha ajb. :-) this expression is so cute that... I love. haha haha :-) intellectual way to tell. but dear ajb ,I am looking for& expect (information) associations has wide concept. thanks to ajb & strange for your opinions.