dimreepr Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 No shit Sherlock. So the answer to the OP isn't just about oxygen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StringJunky Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) No shit Sherlock. So the answer to the OP isn't just about oxygen. Indeed, but the conversation was focused on the oxygen balance, not other factors as well. It helps to actually follow a conversation. Yes, we can survive permanently down to just above half the present oxygen concentration at sea-level; the phytoplankton production should cover the loss from trees being destroyed, in principle, but in practice, there will no doubt be severe consequences from it that may destroy us anyway. Edited August 8, 2016 by StringJunky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimreepr Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) Indeed, but the conversation was focused on the oxygen balance, not other factors as well. It helps to actually follow a conversation. I followed the conversation, but the answer can't be polarised to just the ability to breath or not, we also need food, water and a reasonable temperature. Edited August 8, 2016 by dimreepr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now