Sorcerer Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Since all we see is light, how can anyone say light is perceived emotionally as love? I certainly don't love everything I see. And the good/bad vibration crap has been around for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNow Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Quantum_woo Quantum woo is an attempt to piggy-back on the success and legitimacy of science by claiming quack ideas are rooted in accepted concepts in physics, combined with utter misunderstanding of these concepts and a sense of wonder at the amazing magic these misunderstandings would imply if true. A quick way to tell if a claim about quantum physics has scientific validity is to ask for the mathematics. If there isn't any, it's rubbish. Proponents of quantum woo are affected by the interaction of neural-energy and their natural bozon field, which results in the creation of one moron and the decay of two neurons. The moron has a half-life of 42 years. . Energy is the ability to do work. There is no such thing as a purest form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sorcerer Posted February 29, 2016 Author Share Posted February 29, 2016 I'm trying to convince someone without insulting them. But damn I laughed hard at that last paragraph. They brought this up: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150527103110.htm Am I wrong in trying to explain that thoughts and perception are only given through action. And energy is needed for thought, not all thought is? I began by referencing this : http://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/particle-physics-basics/mass-energy-matter-etc/matter-and-energy-a-false-dichotomy/ But that didn't convince them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phi for All Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Matter has mass, it takes up space. As iNow mentions, energy is just the ability to do work. I wouldn't go with the thoughts and perceptions angle. This is just a case where they took a popsci view of energy and matter, and then stuck a bunch of made-up wishful thinking onto it, hoping it will lend legitimacy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overtone Posted February 29, 2016 Share Posted February 29, 2016 Information is not energy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now