Jump to content

Please disprove this statement


Jkemp

Recommended Posts

I see the topic question as implying "why energy", and therefore the why anything question asked once again. If wheeler is right and all is math information, then energy is a description of those energies, and not "real", only lingering math models . The main question of why energy, or why anything, calls into question "why mathematics?" I see it as a local manifestation that is largely unique to this universe and evolved from simpler substances. A scenario can be derived that explains not only why the pre-BB realm delivered the BB, how this illusion of reality is maintained, (lingering)...and how both acts could have come from the same modus of operation, or starting point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange,

Heat energy is the clarification to what I referred to earlier as "life" energy. I didn't realize vitalism was a possibility, and made an assumption when skimming through an article on vitalism the energy in which it was referring, was conventional energy i.e. heat and not it's own unique type of energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange,

Heat energy is the clarification to what I referred to earlier as "life" energy. I didn't realize vitalism was a possibility, and made an assumption when skimming through an article on vitalism the energy in which it was referring, was conventional energy i.e. heat and not it's own unique type of energy.

 

OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.