Science Forums: Unification Theory draft - DFT - Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net!

Welcome to ScienceForums.Net! We welcome science discussion at all levels — from beginners to researchers, covering topics from biology to computer science, and much more. Registration is fast and free, and allows you to post on the forums, so register now and join the discussions!
  
After you've registered, come in and introduce yourself, or visit the forum index. If you need any help  registering, posting, or if you just have some questions about our site, please feel free to contact us at staff at scienceforums dot net.

  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Create a ScienceForums.Net Blog!
Guest Message © 2012 DevFuse
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Unification Theory draft - DFT would anyone validate? Rate Topic: -----

#21 pogono 


Quark
Hello all,

my article with Unified Field description has been published:
http://www.scirp.org...x?paperID=17700

Moreover...,
soon will appear an article written by some physicist/mathematician, who make citation of mine, confirms my results and generalize my equations using Killing vector fields (and Gauss-Codazzi equation).

You may find draft of this article here:
http://tp-theory.net...oof-theory.html

He confirms f.e. what I have shown:
- we may consider reference frame assigned to photon!! (if we use Killing observers)
- we may derive GR equations using Rindler's transformation on flat Minkowski space-time what digs a tunnel between GR and QM

Have a good reading
pogono
0

#22 User is online  imatfaal 


Icon
Primate
I don't recognize the name Journal of Modern Physics but congratulations - I will try and read it, but probably way over my head
A little learning is a dangerous thing; drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, and drinking largely sobers us again.

- Alexander Pope
feel free to click the green [+] ---->
0

#23 pogono 


Quark
Thank you imatfaal.

In my article I have just shown, that we may consider accelerated photons (!) and the result is the same that GR formulas (what is generalized by Kuroneko with Killing vector fields in second link I provide).

It means we may consider accelerated wave => "accelerated wave function".

Since De Broglie (and then Schrödinger and Dirac) we do not imagine gravity other way, then just another quantum interaction. Higgs describes it this way.

Now, we may leave this way and consider accelerated photon. We do not need "the mass" anymore!...

I appreciate if someone will develop it farther with Lie Algebra.
0

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users