quickquestion Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 All the empirical evidence shows in the opposite direction: that consciousness is a function of the processes in the brain. Philosophy contradicting empirical evidence is very poor philosophy, and in fact worthless. Not a big fan of his thread, it sounds like mumbo jumbo. In any case, emperical evidence indicates a small amount of telepathic conscious influence. The amount is very small, and not of the psychadelic mumbo jumbo proprieties implied in the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 Not a big fan of his thread, it sounds like mumbo jumbo. In any case, emperical evidence indicates a small amount of telepathic conscious influence. The amount is very small, and not of the psychadelic mumbo jumbo proprieties implied in the OP. Can you provide a reference to this evidence (preferably from a peer reviewed publication). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickquestion Posted April 23, 2017 Author Share Posted April 23, 2017 Can you provide a reference to this evidence (preferably from a peer reviewed publication). It is called the Global Consciousness Project. http://noosphere.princeton.edu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 It is called the Global Consciousness Project. http://noosphere.princeton.edu While interesting, that is not about "telepathic conscious influence". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quickquestion Posted April 23, 2017 Author Share Posted April 23, 2017 While interesting, that is not about "telepathic conscious influence". perhaps I should rephrase it as "emotional telepathy." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imatfaal Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 I am also pretty sure that the Global Consciousness Project is yet to identify a real data point. Mother Theresa's funeral, 9/11 etc all provided blips - but with no good correlation and no differentiation between blips when nothing happened. All a load of crackpottery at present til they pony up some significant data 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strange Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 I am also pretty sure that the Global Consciousness Project is yet to identify a real data point. Mother Theresa's funeral, 9/11 etc all provided blips - but with no good correlation and no differentiation between blips when nothing happened. All a load of crackpottery at present til they pony up some significant data It did look like an exercise in selection and confirmation biases, but I haven't looked at it in enough detail to draw any conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts