It happened the other day, when someone thought they were "posting accepted physics to disprove the proposal" but that in itself was wrong and was corrected by another person other than the OP.

So that correcting action is not covered by your 3 categories.

 

 

 

If the incorrect physics was posted as a rebuttal to the conjecture, then the correcting action is still posting accepted physics to rebut the OP.

 

 

 

If the incorrect physics was posted as a rebuttal to the conjecture, then the correcting action is still posting accepted physics to rebut the OP.

It cancelled the incorrect post, but neither helped the proposal (A) nor rebutted it ( C ).

Edited March 25, 20169 yr by Robittybob1

!

Moderator Note

 

 

It cancelled the incorrect post, but neither helped the proposal (A) nor rebutted it ( C ).

 

OK time to stop arguing. You are basically trolling whether you know it or not. Swansont and the other members in this thread have made it abundantly clear what a hijack is. Your continued hair-splitting and/or failure to understand very simple instructions/rules is just too much - stop now.

 

Thread Locked - the point has been made and you are just (deliberately or not) confusing the issue.