0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 I have a new theory/branch of physics with equations in working order since posting a link is against the rules i will just post the whole articles. and this wiill not spit in the face of WHAT IS KNOWN. Terms: Midewin.Physics can not be translated or degraded this is not meant out of disrespect but for the importance of understanding the language and culture of thought that gave it form. The Basics of Reality. Binary♥Symmetry ( yup just like that. ) This binary is in essence sacred constructs that spread forth upon truth to create the foundations required for our natural and very probable co-existence. They make up our beautiful reality and endless potential. They represent quantum physics and relativity and perhaps even more! Im excited, what about you? 0.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.1 This is the basis of Binary♥Symmetry 0 and 1 can only move forward due to the natural order of probability. This can be represented as strings in the natural universe but they are but a piece of a grand design. I have started working on a set of fundamental ideas and equations and of coursetheories. Our natural existence. Till then have a slice of π, enjoy a song and think about it. The end of our exploring will be to arrive at where we started, and to know the place for the first time. T.S. Eliot 1+1=2 Disclaimer: I know that my ideas are unorthodox, I know that what Im presenting to you on these pages, dear world, may fly in the face of all that you may have thought about our natural universe. I only ask that you be brave enough to forget what you think you may know for a moment and allow yourself to be open to the possibilities of what you can discover. To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is the meaning of true knowledge. -Socrates 2 is so perfect so very perfect! Cue the music! Did you know 2 can adapt to any situation? And by any one I mean every single one. Lets see if you see what I see.0+0 = 00+1 = 11+1 = 22=1+12+2=4+2=6+2=8+2=12+1=3+1=4+1=5+2=7+2=9+2=? This can work in a number of ways because thats how nature works. Lets do a simple math problem using binary♥Symmetry this isXn + Yn = Zn the same as it ever wasAx+ By = Cz or written like this.-1^4 + -1^4=-2^4-1^4 + -1^4=-2^4 Why can this can not be the answer is very simple. Negative numbers are human concepts. Numbers greater than nine and less than zero cannot be binary♥Symmetry. Now here is a misconception I have thought on; how do we know that we are answering questions with the proper method or system? The Scarlet King Snake can be misjudged as a the very deadly Coral Snake or vice- versa. Recognize that perception and understanding require you to learn again anew; no one can be so bold as to say that they truly have mastered any subject or craft . One particular culture strives for this but they realize the fact they are still learning. The beauty in learning is you always find something new.Xn + Yn = Zn = Fermat's last theorem-1^4 + -1^4=1^4 One to the fourth power; the starting point of the Infinite expansion of the universe. Our place is co-existence with it, since evolution and time only allow us to move forward. Therefore, one will always become 2 or it will not survive. the duality of nature also allows for another interpretation of 1^4 = 3 dimensonal space + time. You can not decide empirically and choose what numbers and how if they go against the nature of reality and our existence. This is not a television show, this is truth. 0<1=2=3=4=5=6=7=8=9=1=2=3=4=5=6=7=8=9=∞ I have more to share, so much more to share, but I need your help to make it happen and I am building a team of intelligent aware and thoughtful people to help me do it. Keep in mind this still allows what we know to be true already, and I have already long started this process. Think. For some I urge you to think on tzu sun and mountains, and ask your heart then your mind then your logic. Equations based on truth Τ = Tau perhaps taught as tao as well. I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives. -Tolstoy -Ochitawa Debwewin ⊗ωχτα The scientific community fails as epic as the religious ones you allow no room for humanity's perception and part in reality it's either some yahoo and god's will or scientist to measure the impossible. Do you think you could every have a theory of everything solely based on math and scientific method that is utter arrogance. and as bad as those who kill over blind faith it is not different in the eyes of truth. When you cut out the human part you lose everything. some of the greatest minds have already spoken of this. argue with this. "New opinions are always suspected, and usually opposed, without any other reason but because they are not already common." - John Locke a formatted version is here at link Reno Removed thanks for reading this I would love to expolore multiple topics with all, I love sharing ideas and knowledge, so do you reply Honesty is always welcomed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Can you show how to numerically find the altitude of a geostationary orbit using your idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 Can you show how to numerically find the altitude of a geostationary orbit using your idea? you can already you missed the point. This binary is in essence sacred constructs that spread forth upon truth to create the foundations required for our natural and very probable co-existence. They make up our beautiful reality and endless potential. They represent quantum physics and relativity and perhaps even more! I’m excited, what about you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 What point?, it's pure gibberish. There is nothing here with predictive ability on any specific relations. The only descriptive is word salad badly grinded to absolute mush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 you can already you missed the point. Can you actually calculate anything useful within your framework. Or in other words, show us what this has got to do with physics, any physics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 your not posing a valid argument. Disprove it. argue the logic I already stated that physics as we know it is represented and not discounted. -3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 your not posing a valid argument. Disprove it. As you are the one with the ideas here it is up to you to show us that there is something in your idea. Thus, you will need to show how this is relevant at all to physics. Even if it is not very clear, you will still need to do some work in convincing people that there is some worth to this idea. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 your not posing a valid argument. Disprove it. Yes we are, science is about describing how a leads to b, it's about predictive ability of studied relations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 stop dodging it. when you can counter it with out bullshit round about responses let me know. -4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 There is no dodging, you haven't posted any scientific relation or statement. This is a science forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 stop dodging it. when you can counter it with out bullshit round about responses let me know. '1^4 = 3 dimensonal space + time' This I do not understand please explain it carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) Your math isn't even correct... Binary is a numerical system based on 2 states 0 and 1. Yet your limits is the decimal system 1 to 10. Edited March 9, 2015 by Mordred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Can you actually calculate anything useful within your framework. Or in other words, show us what this has got to do with physics, any physics. This was very much what I was trying to get at. There doesn't seem to be any physics here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) Your not even properly describing Fermats last theorem in your relations. Even though you mention it http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FermatsLastTheorem.html Edited March 9, 2015 by Mordred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 it can be shown as the bench mark of of the big bang but space had to exist so did time at that very moment. zero represents gravity also know as the weakest force thus 0<1 that first moment with quantum mechanics fired like a blaze of glory. that 1 turned to 2 to spread, this is super symmetry in a natural order in patterns that make up atoms chemical interactions. A key ingredient of our universe and existence. 3 dimensions of space and time. 1+4 or 1 to the four things that allow us to be alive where is reality with out perception. what number is man represented by. and my best guess real space would have to be white. 012345678910 Are the only true numbers. period anything else is human manipulation of them and lets not forget relativity so by that very nature precise measurement is automatically inaccurate if anothers perception differs. I also make use of the golden ratio and pi in practical manners that are view able and interactive but I assume your not ready understand that yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Huh nothing in your last post makes any sense at all. Your problem seems to be you don't understand science and take offense to it. Well too bad, science is what provided you the ability to post this gibberish in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 Because you have no imaginative process of understanding only logic I have both. -3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) it can be shown as the bench mark of of the big bang but space had to exist so did time at that very moment. zero represents gravity also know as the weakest force thus 0<1 Okay, so we have space and time and 0<1. These are both okay statement, but I am not sure how they are deeply connected? that first moment with quantum mechanics fired like a blaze of glory. Okay, nature seems to obey the rules of quantum mechanics. Fine. that 1 turned to 2 to spread.... You need to explain this. I map 1 -> 2, but what has this got to do with quantum mechanics? ..this is super symmetry in a natural order in patterns that make up atoms chemical interactions. You need to explain this. A key ingredient of our universe and existence. 3 dimensions of space and time. 1+4 or 1 to the four things that allow us to be alive where is reality with out perception. We all agree that we need space+time, but what has this got to do with your opening post? There seems no content here. Edited March 9, 2015 by ajb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Any metric system can be used. You can replace the decimal system with binary, hexadecimal, octadecimal etc with the same degree of accuracy. Provided you formulate the relationships accurately. The decimal system is simply more convenient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 Your all dancing with words get it, you don't get it, maybe one day you will. I already pegged your responses I already challenged you and your not posting a counter example some thing on the contrary. so you have failed in understanding not I. -3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ajb Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 (edited) Your all dancing with words get it, you don't get it, maybe one day you will. I already pegged your responses I already challenged you and your not posting a counter example some thing on the contrary. so you have failed in understanding not I. As a counter example [math]-1^4 - 1^4 \neq 1^4[/math] Anyway, you seem to have this all the wrong way round. You cannot make some random ideas up that have no meaning and then suggest that it must be true as we cannot clearly counter your claims. The problem is you have not been clear enough for anyone to make very concise arguments as to what you are wrong. Apart from some mathematics mistakes, I don't know how to counter 'gibberish'. Thus it is up to you to convince us you are on to something. Edited March 9, 2015 by ajb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaynos Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 You should review our rules, especially those that are special for the speculations forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 Finally real feed back. I will answer and we can debate agree or disagree. 1>2 this is evolution understand 1-2-3-4-5 this is how nature works but it has to be based on truth quantum mechanics will never make a 50 foot woman appear in Manhattan it s not grounded in realty. and 1 will never become zero again in a sense. this system can also explain a basic understanding of parallel universes and a more dynamic universe... we can not see the true beauty of a nebula with a naked eye. we ignore the multi-dimensional nature of reality in the sense of how it can work in multiple ways beyond the ideas of strings and our very understanding. the numbers I have put my work into have equations to match on many different fundamental levels because with out physics they can not exist. without them I do not believe physics would exist either. I know it is bold but that is what progress is about and granted you may never agree with me but know I agree with the proven science but trying to marry the two schools is impossible because the approach is wrong. will explain my understanding of fermat. n = 4 only negative numbers correct? -a -b -c the laws of nature will not allow a -2 that is a concept of man. 1 to the 4th period. logic. Simplicity. the basis. I have stated this all very clearly. Over complication of basic principle is not a sign of intelligence. -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mordred Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 Yawn, more gibberish 1 is not greater than 2. Fermats theorem In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation a^n + b^n = c^n for any integer value of n greater than two It does NOT state anything you are stating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
0chitauA1 Posted March 9, 2015 Author Share Posted March 9, 2015 Fermat left no details of his proof apart from the special case n = 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now