Not really.

 

It is impossible to set up a truly 2D coordinate system on the surface of a 3D object.

 

Take for instance a sphere. You can specify where on the surface a point lies, but you cannot tell the distance between two points without at least one measurement in the third dimension. The same is true of any 3d object.

ok

Edited August 24, 201312 yr by sheever

my interpetation is based on hidden information as Susskind suggest. this according to the holographic principle which is compatible with Copenhagen interpation also with heisenberg interpetation but based on quantum competition as fundamental base and explain wave particle duality.(this explain why Hawking wasnt allowed to be accepted in his equation as information destroyed which is go against the first law of physics)that easily explained with a constant entanglement as Penrose pointed out.this is applies in our daily life instantly.

my main point is with based on perception we creates devices we using to measure the effects of this competition and its nonsense to deny the fact all measurement needed the basis in the form of perception so discard this fact is utter nonsense.

without perception we have no reference at all that also would mean we are not exist since no reference to localize the reference frame.

pls dont start the debate you dont understand what i am saying here.

this is absolute logical and aplies in your every day life and its consequence of you able to define you re exist its fundamental.

the chance of i am right the same is i am wrong.so nothing is fact. if there is an underlay core exist as the holographic principle suggest its just explain the effect or the consequence of the structure not the core itself.your consideration as its the whole picture also can fail at any point.

Edited August 24, 201312 yr by sheever