what if herpes is an organ that can support polymerases for the viral transport of xna propagation in dna

herpes virus is not an organ. Unless you've re-purposed words to mean different things.

duu

 

what makes polymerases? is that rna?

 

duu

 

what makes polymerases? is that rna?

 

 

jp sorta. e.coli has a it's own polymerase

 

 

 

duu

 

what makes polymerases? is that rna?

 

scrap that crap. say i propagated xna in the nucleus of a human cell. xna was copied from dna by way of viral polymerase and the "concrete" material transported in the viral cell. i was just pondering how to keep the virus in the body.

 

you know? i wonder how test trial and error systems can be run on computers to find exact pair matches of proteined polymerases for something liek this

 

i'm fascinated by the emergence of technological programmed compatibilities in the comple dynamic system

 

i'm fascinated by the emergence of technological programmed compatibilities in the comple dynamic system

To me the post does not clarify anything. If anything it makes even less sense. There is little to discuss unless the word usage is clarified.

Hi, my name is Marcus Williams and I am an undergrad at Alvernia University and I am a biochemisty major. I was just curious as to what xna is?

 

 

 

XNA is synthetic dna(lab created) which base pairs are like dna in a way, but more stable.

 

to answer the topic starters question: No, its impossible. Herpes is a virus, and cannot be an organ that produces its own polymerase. It's a virus. xna is synthetic, by definition it means that its lab created. To make xna I would think normal HF-polymerase is used. Redesigning the polymerase specifically for xna would be unnecessary. XNA is also unfavorable for a virus because mutation is the only way for a virus to create diversity. XNA is more stable than dna, which would limit mutation.

XNA is synthetic dna(lab created) which base pairs are like dna in a way, but more stable.

 

to answer the topic starters question: No, its impossible. Herpes is a virus, and cannot be an organ that produces its own polymerase. It's a virus. xna is synthetic, by definition it means that its lab created. To make xna I would think normal HF-polymerase is used. Redesigning the polymerase specifically for xna would be unnecessary. XNA is also unfavorable for a virus because mutation is the only way for a virus to create diversity. XNA is more stable than dna, which would limit mutation.

 

Thanks very much! Could the production of xna increase our chances of curing diseases? Do you think there could possibly be a clinical application

to exchange damaged dna for xna?