Hal. Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 For comparison , I think that water in a lake has properties of a cloud while not being a cloud . I also think that a wooden table has properties of a tree while not being a tree . So , I can see this viewpoint as an explanation . But , I would also suggest it possible that Ernest Rutherford had another meaning for radio-active . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 I would also suggest it possible that Ernest Rutherford had another meaning for radio-active . That's what I had suggested. Rutherford's definition may not be the same as the modern definition; we know more. We should use the modern definition that has the benefit of the application all that extra knowledge. By the modern definition, alphas, betas and gammas are not radioactive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts