Jump to content

What the the drawbacks of an 51,464,450,000,000 Hz FEL?

Featured Replies

Hi:

 

I recently posted something similar messages. I apologize profusely if anyone is annoyed.

 

Infra-red C spectrum = 100,000 nm to 3,000 nm

 

100,000 nm = 2.9979e12 Hz = 2,997,900,000,000 Hz

 

3,000 nm = 9.9931e13 Hz = 99,931,000,000,000 Hz

 

Arithmetic mean of IR-C spectrum = 51,464,450,000,000 Hz = 5825.23388 nm

 

Due to the above and the inability of the device in http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/53451-wide-spectrum-irc-emission-device/ to exist, I'm now thinking of a free-electron 51,464,450,000,000 Hz laser for the same applications of that previous IR-C emitting device.

 

In addition, the emission of the 51,464,450,000,000 Hz light from this laser is constant, non-flickering and non-pulsatile – in other words, continuous-wave. The shape of the laser emitting this radiation is square or rectangular depending on the application. In any case, the laser faces downward from the ceiling -- or other "top" -- of an enclosure and emits the IR-C light *downwards* only.

 

My question is, what would be the disadvantages – besides the cost and bulkiness – of using this hypothetical free-electron 51,464,450,000,000 Hz for the applications discussed in http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/53451-wide-spectrum-irc-emission-device/ ?

 

Once again, I hope no one is upset as a result of my messages.

 

 

Thanks & Happy Holidays,

 

Green Xenon

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.