It is already known, that the 'universal language' is mathematics. This is not in question! It is the human preception of this language, that must be presumed as accurate, until verifiable 'empirical' evidence is introduced! This must then become accepted, and applied from the platform of mathematics, and rendered to 'all' branches of science, technology, communications . . . etc., and into the general public domain! CERN LHC programs are our only known hope of an 'Axiom Proof', in all fields of endeavor, and this will not be without extreme risks!

 

http://thefifthknight.blogspot.com/

 

Remember: Follow the 'White Rabbit'!

If you want to link to your blog, that's super. You may, however, consider adding it to your signature instead.

 

 

http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/profile.php?do=editsignature

Thank you for assistance! I have just now added my signature to SF files.

Physics doesn't go in much for handwaving language, it likes maths, you can test maths and clearly see when you're wrong...

It is not the universal language of mathematics, that is in question, but the human interpretation of those axiom proofs. We are forced to accept your written formulae, until 'empirical' evidence renders the 'real' verdict! An unfortunate example can be found within General Relativity: not only can the dimensional mass shrink or grow (under certain circumstances), but the measuring devices as well! The human perception is not exempt from flaw, over immense distances. Before running around with our math solutions as gospel, we should anticipate enlightenment from CERN LHC!

what do you mean by:

 

until 'empirical' evidence renders the 'real' verdict!

 

The maths is the REAL verdict that's what the empirical evidence shows. And frankly putting empirical in quotes is an insult.

 

CERN will create more data that will be compared to more equations and hopefully aid our derivation of new ones...

With half of the 'Standard Model' missing, shrouded within a mathematical haze of pure speculation (intelligent guessing); there is absolutely no way of telling which parts are accurate! However, for now it is all we have to work with!

 

empirical (no insult intended).