tsolkas Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 The difference of 43´´/century with astronomic observations as regards the advance of Mercury’s perihelion is not attributed to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as the Theory of Relativity erroneously maintains. The 43´´/century of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion (as demonstrated above) are due to the revolution of the Sun around the center of mass of our Solar system, a fact that until today has never been taken into account when calculating the advance of Mercury’s perihelion. Finally, after everything discussed in this paper, the Theory of Relativity should be unquestionably deemed erroneous. more......http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html Christos A. Tsolkas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timo Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Three remarks: 1) Is this thread remarkably different from your last ones about the same topic? 2) What time of the year do all planets and the sun lie on one line (as shown in your picture and demanded by your calculation) ? 3) What is the underlying reason to assume the planets orbit around that (incorrectly calculated) center of mass ? EDIT: Forget 2), I found the corresponding passage in your text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insane_alien Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 4. what makes you think that the center of mass(the right one) has not been factored into the calculation using both newtonian and einsteinian gravity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ydoaPs Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 The difference of 43´´/century with astronomic observations as regards the advance of Mercury’s perihelion is not attributed to the curvature of space-time around the Sun' date=' as the Theory of Relativity erroneously maintains. The 43´´/century of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion ([b']as demonstrated above[/b]) are due to the revolution of the Sun around the center of mass of our Solar system I must have missed where you demonstrated anything in the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphus Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 4. what makes you think that the center of mass(the right one) has not been factored into the calculation using both newtonian and einsteinian gravity? Better not make that a question. Instead, "Yes, we have at least a basic understanding of Newtonian physics, and never thought the center of sun was the point about which the planets orbitted." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swansont Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Has tsolkas ever responded to anything? I count four posts, in four threads. Hit & run. No sense in wasting more time answering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cap'n Refsmmat Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Closed and moved. tsolkas is, as swansont says, a hit-and-run poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts