This Earth's #1 this Time

[Sayonara]

 

That's.... horrible!

[Garry Denke]

dave said in post #21 :

I was never one of those experimental evidence people myself

 

Then what are you doing here in Science Forums?

 

Science is experimental evidence.

[Sayonara]

Unless you're conducting literature-based research of course, which is non-experimental evidence.

 

[Garry Denke]

greg1917 said in post #22 :

Post one more useless pile of rubbish like any of this again and I'll delete it then limit your posting rights.

 

None of these people say Doctor Garry Whilhelm Denke's 1656 discovery of the chronstratigraphic Early Carboniferous, Arundian Age, Birnbeck Limestone Formation [Lower Carboniferous (early Mississippian) Waulsortian facies (Mid-Dinantian; Tournaisian-Visean) High Tor Limestone, et al] original lithology of Stonehenge's 56 Aubrey Holes fill, Counterscarp Bank, Heelstone Ditch bottom-half, and 100 metre ESE Stonehenge Mound is a useless pile of rubbish;

 

http://www.thenakedscientists.com

http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page1.asp

http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk

http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk

http://www.wessexarch.co.uk

http://www.bgs.ac.uk

 

Why do you?

 

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/CARBON/carbon.html

 

The real question is why were the 56 Aubrey Holes dug, filled with the elder limestone elders, then dug out again, and such elder limestone elders mounded in 100 metre ESE Stonehenge Mound, both being used as depositories for cremated bones and things, and rituals and such?

 

http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg

[atinymonkey]

They are scientists, not archeologists. Simplifying the question helps!

 

And the Aubrey holes are just head scratchy. They were just diggin' holes, for all we know. There really isn't much funding around to re-examine the evidence collected in past digs. The answer is probably sitting in some corridor, in a plastic bag helpfully labeling it as 'stuff from hole #32'.

 

Unless you have a link to a site that has the info stored on it, all our theorys will be clearly labeled 'crazy'.

[greg1917]

Garry read your first post. It sounds like a heroin addict has burgled a house and stolen a keyboard. I can see you're trying to make a point, so why dont you attempt to do so via the beautifully crafted and poetic medium that is the Queen's English.

[Garry Denke]

Sayonara³ said in post #28 :

Unless you're conducting literature-based research of course, which is non-experimental evidence.

 

Of course, but the 1656 cores of German historian, antiquarian, and Doctor Garry Whilhelm Denke [b. April 19, 1622, Baden, Schwarzwald, Germany - d. February 19, 1699, Caddo Confederacies (Texas)] who first discovered the Lower Carboniferous (early Mississippian) Waulsort stones are well preserved and well protected (and on public display) at Denoco Inc. of Texas' REVELATION MISS. ARCHER COUNTY ARCHIVE, CATALOGUE NO. 76080500, Archer County, Texas, prorated by;

 

http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/divisions/og/proration/oildist9-5.html

 

[first 24 elder white limestone elders (fossils) identified]

 

01) Aclisina

02) Aviculopecten

03) Bellerophon

04) Caninia cornucopiae

05) Chondrites

06) Cleiothyridina roissyi

07) Composita

08) Conocardium

09) Delepinea (Daviesiella) destinezi

10) Euphemites

11) Girvanella

12) Hapsiphyllum (Zaphrentis) konincki

13) Linoproductus

14) Megachonetes papilionaceous

15) Michelina grandis

16) Mourlonia

17) Murchisonia

18) Palaeosmilia

19) Plicochonetes

20) Rhipidomella michelini

21) Schellwienella cf. S. crenistria

22) Straparollus

23) Syringopora

24) Zoophycos

 

Interesting how 3/4's of the Counterscarp Bank originally encircling Stonehenge's Main Ditch is now piled together with the 56 Aubrey Holes original fill, so rubbishly, at 100 metre ESE Stonehenge Mound (back ground of photo);

 

http://www.orionbeadling.net/CSCARPelev.jpg

 

The remainder of the original Counterscarp Bank elder white limestone elders (fossils) was, so rubbishly, rammed tightly in the Heelstone ditch bottom-half (left side of photo).

[Garry Denke]

atinymonkey said in post #30 :

And the Aubrey holes are just head scratchy. They were just diggin' holes, for all we know. There really isn't much funding around to re-examine the evidence collected in past digs.

 

Less environmental impact with cores. Doctor Garry Whilhelm Denke (a German dentist) invented the first core barrel used in antiquity investigation. His four foot [4', 1.2m] long unsoldered hammered out flat iron plate core barrel, which is rounded with the slit unsoldered (for sliding the cores out), together with its top solid driving iron two feet [2', 0.6m], being six foot [6' 1.8m] long in total length, is housed (and on display) at Joint Resorces Company STONEHENGE CADDO BAYLOR COUNTY ARCHIVE, CATALOGUE NO. 86336075, Baylor County, Texas

 

Scroll to Stonehenge

 

http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/divisions/og/proration/oildist9-5.html

 

in England (north of England Cemetary) Texas. England and England Cemetary are East of Seymour (pronounced "See more") Texas, on England Road;

 

http://mappoint.msn.com/(h00wgfrgykxzxffebuz20d55)/map.aspx?L=USA&C=33.60249%2c-99.25506&A=41.56667&P=|76E9|&TI=Seymour%2c+Texas%2c+United+States

 

[England is a Ghost Town so keep Enlarging to England Cemetary]

[Garry Denke]

greg1917 said in post #31 :

I can see you're trying to make a point, so why don't you attempt to do so via the beautifully crafted and poetic medium that is the Queen's English.

 

The point Greg, is that over 800,000 pounds (400 tons, 8,510 cu-ft) of Early Carboniferous, Arundian Age, Birnbeck Limestone Formation [Lower Carboniferous (early Mississippian) Waulsortian facies (Mid-Dinantian; Tournaisian-Visean) High Tor Limestone Formation, et al] were hauled to Stonehenge for a reason.

 

As you know, the in situ geological outcrop chalk at Stonehenge, upon which the megaliths rest, and in which all of the earthworks were dug, is the much younger (by over 200,000,000 million years) Late Cretaceous, Santonian Age, Seaford Chalk Formation [upper Cretaceous (Senonian) White Chalk].

 

The question is, why did the Stonehenge builder go to all the trouble of transporting over 800,000 pounds of this elder chalk-like white limestone to Stonehenge, such elder limestone having the appearance of the white younger in situ geological outcrop chalk, yet the fossils, definitely differentiate the two.

 

The answer is, Post 1 above. There is one genuine Ancient gold ark, gold table, gold altar, gold candlestick, gold censer, etc., on every planet with evolved life, the same such excavated on the same day and hour on each such same time evolved planet everywhere. In short, the whole thing is the builder's plan.

 

Paleontology locates the artifacts and it is time to dig them up.

 

Garry Denke, Geologist

[Sayonara]

Ummm... not really seeing the connection between chalk being in the wrong place, and the quest for a golden ark.

 

 

PS - 200,000,000 million years...? That's older than the universe iirc.

[Garry Denke]

Sayonara³ said in post #35 :

Ummm... not really seeing the connection between chalk being in the wrong place, and the quest for a golden ark. PS - 200,000,000 million years...?

 

Thread Experiment No. 200,000,000

 

So you do actually read these posts... that's great... edited by editor...

 

...As you know, the in situ outcrop chalk at Stonehenge, upon which the megaliths rest, and in which all of the earthworks were dug, is the much younger [by over two hundred million (200,000,000) years] Late Cretaceous, Santonian Age, Seaford Chalk Formation [upper Cretaceous (Senonian) White Chalk];

 

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/CRETAC/cretac.html

(over)http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/CARBON/carbon.html

(under)

 

However; Carboniferous ~1/4 of Counterscarp Bank and Aubrey Holes remnant fill, ~3/4 of Counterscarp Bank and Aubrey Holes original fill piled at 100 metre ESE Stonehenge Mound, and the ~remainder rammed round Stonehole 96's Ditch bottom-half, are BGS timechart reversed concerning Carboniferous/Cretaceous at Stonehenge;

 

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/CARBON/carbon.html

(over)

http://www.bgs.ac.uk/education/britstrat/timecharts/CRETAC/cretac.html

(under)

 

Concerning the connection of the elder limestone elders [over eight hundred thousand (800,000) pounds of them] over Aaron's gold casket (EX gold altar 1x1x2) and Moses' gold casket (EX gold table 2x1x1-1/2) and the gold candlestick, et al, located in one hundred metre (100m) east-southeast (ESE) Stonehenge Mound; and concerning the connection of the elder limestone elders [round thirty seven thousand six hundred (37,600) pounds (18.8 tons, 400 cubic-feet) of them], circling Jesus' gold casket (EX gold ark 2-1/2x1-1/2x1-1/2) having four (4) wings centered plumb with Stone 96's overhanging two (2) wings (4 wings + 2 wings = 6 wings), one would have to read those posts also.

 

Unfortunately they were deleted, so Sayonara.

[Sayonara]

Whut?

[YT2095]

I wonder if the stuff he`s on is actualy legal?

[Garry Denke]

YT2095 said in post #39 :

I wonder if the stuff he`s on is actualy legal?

 

http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?search=actualy

 

Actually: Experiment No. 200,000,001; Sayonara

[YT2095]

Oh well... so much for "bennefit of the doubt" and waiting for the drug effects to wear off, I said I`de leave this thread many posts ago, nothings changed it would seem.

the YT`s outa here!

[greg1917]

Garry, where in God's green Earth do arrive at the assumption Stonehenge is the site of The golden arc or whatever it is your saying? have you missed out three or four paragraphs of explanation?

[atinymonkey]

I'm trying to figure out the Texas oil link to core sampling of Stonehenge.

 

Or the link to Texas at all, to be honest.

[Garry Denke]

greg1917 said in post #42 :

Garry, where in God's green Earth do arrive at the assumption Stonehenge is the site of The...

 

Throne: Exodus' gold ark of the testimony;

from G's (Government's) US Signal Corps,

 

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=KjvReve.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public∂=4&division=div1

 

"After this I looked, and, behold, a door was opened in heaven: and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet talking with me; which said, Come up hither, and I will shew thee things which must be hereafter. And immediately I was in the spirit: and, behold, a throne was set in heaven, and one sat on the throne. And he that sat was to look upon like a jasper and a sardine stone: and there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald. And round about the throne were four and twenty seats: and upon the seats I saw four and twenty elders sitting, clothed in white raiment; and they had on their heads crowns of gold. And out of the throne proceeded lightnings and thunderings and voices: and there were seven lamps of fire burning before the throne, which are the seven Spirits of God. And before the throne there was a sea of glass like unto crystal: and in the midst of the throne, and round about the throne, were four beasts full of eyes before and behind.

 

Heel Stone Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), Eagle wings (centering) http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/beckih@flash.net/vwp?.dir=/Travel&.dnm=101-0189_img.jpg&.src=ph&.view=t&.hires=t

 

And the first beast was like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the fourth beast was like a flying eagle. And the four beasts had each of them six wings about him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come. And when those beasts give glory and honour and thanks to him that sat on the throne, who liveth for ever and ever, The four and twenty elders fall down before him that sat on the throne, and worship him that liveth for ever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying, Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created."

 

the same who decoded this cryptogram.

That makes them the Lord God Almighty.

[Garry Denke]

atinymonkey said in post #43 :

I'm trying to figure out the Texas oil link to core sampling of Stonehenge. Or the link to Texas at all, to be honest.

 

The Texas oil link and the Texas ghost town is where the 1656 Stonehenge UK coring tool is housed, along with 1/3rd of the 1656 cores. This coring tool and the 1656 Stonehenge UK cores were handed down by 5th Sgt. T. B. Fortenberry, Co. F., 21st Regt., Ark Inf., C.S.A. to the Caddo Indian Nation (of Brazos River) Tommy Littlepage, then to me, in 1979, at the Littlepage #1 Carboniferous oil well. It is the coring tool used by Doctor Garry Whilhelm Denke, a German historian, antiquarian, and dentist [b. April 19, 1622, Baden, Schwarzwald, Germany - d. February 19, 1699, Caddo Confederacies (Texas)], who in 1656 at Stonehenge UK, first cored and described the elder white Carboniferous limestone elders (fossils) there. Proof of this is Doctor Denke's first publication of these biological white stone elders (fossils), later coined "Stonehenge Whitestones" with James Harrison of BBCi (see Wiltshire "Stoned"), in 2002. The coring tool and 1/3rd of the 1656 Stonehenge UK core samples (552 total) are well preserved and well protected (and currently on display) at the following legal description: 111 Feet from the South Line (FSL) and 1,864 Feet from the East Line (FEL) of T. & N. O. R.R. Company Survey, Section No. 198, Abstract No. 749, Certificate No. 679, Baylor County (BC), Texas, (Caddo Confederacies) [entrance England Road at England Cemetary to British-American Seymour (pronounced "See more") Canyon oil Pool, but inside the Stonehenge Caddo oil Field, England, BC, Texas, CC]

 

http://mappoint.msn.com/(h00wgfrgykxzxffebuz20d55)/map.aspx?L=USA&C=33.60249%2c-99.25506&A=41.56667&P=|76E9|&TI=Seymour%2c+Texas%2c+United+States

 

[England is a Ghost Town so keep Enlarging to England Cemetary]

[Sayonara]

Still not seeing a connection between biblical descriptions and a pagan/druidic calendar.

 

This is going into pseudoscience unless and until a testable hypothesis is presented in a readable fashion.

[Garry Denke]

Sayonara³ said in post #45 :

Still not seeing a connection between biblical descriptions and a pagan/druidic calendar.

 

And still the greatest cryptogram on this planet.

 

http://www.henge.org.uk/wiltshire/heelstone.jpg

 

(four wings plumb with overhanging two wings)

 

Geophysics Dept.

Denoco Inc. of Texas

[greg1917]

Yes...

 

And pseudoscience it is.

[Glider]

Hmmm...I dunno...even pseudoscience makes sense enough to be able to say...'uhuh, yep I understand that...it's crap'. This, I don't get at all.

[Garry Denke]

greg1917 said in post #47 :

Yes... And pseudoscience it is.

 

Geophysical surveys' pseudoscience?

 

ahh ha ha ha ha haa

 

Have a nice day Greg of 1917

 

Garry of 2003

[Sayonara]

Collating data that others have worked hard for then constructing elaborate ideas in your head is one thing, interpreting it and presenting an actual hypothesis with a reasoned explanation is something quite different.

 

That's what you have failed to present, Garry, and that's why Greg is right.